Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Your not making your arguments any better. you lose very mobile units to slow ones. losing a m20 or aatrack to shreks pucphen is mistake of the allied player unless pathing screws you up
Posts: 1617
Posts: 403
Posts: 2070
Axis doesn't have the best AT options in the game
8 Posts: 2470
yep on certain maps the jp4 is pretty good. but still its the weakest td because the okw lack of snares.
Posts: 4928
SU85 is pretty trashy at vet0 im not sure u want it
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
8 Posts: 2470
Posts: 1637
Because at least it can choose to spot for itself or watch it's backside, the Jagdpanzer cannot do either one. I still don't understand why the Jagdpanzer has a visual handicap with no buff.
The PTRS's are fine as they are. Whenever i'm up against Guard Infantry, I always have to be careful with my vehicles or the Guards will completely destroy them. Good range, good damage and fairly cheap; if anything, the PTRS should nerfed since it's ridiculously good for the price. Even in the hands of Conscripts, the PTRS's are extremely potent.
Posts: 4928
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
Posts: 1637
Never saw a Jagdpanzer get more than Vet 1, it either misses every shot, doesn't penetrate, or is sitting in the rear echelon somewhere because it can't be trusted to be anywhere without being babysat.
Also, the Firefly was a British tank, not American.
The PTRS's are fine as they are. Whenever i'm up against Guard Infantry, I always have to be careful with my vehicles or the Guards will completely destroy them. Good range, good damage and fairly cheap; if anything, the PTRS should nerfed since it's ridiculously good for the price. Even in the hands of Conscripts, the PTRS's are extremely potent.
8 Posts: 2470
Posts: 4928
Hold on there SIR! I just noticed this part
"doesn't penetrate"
What is it shooting at Mecha Stalin or only IS2s? What will it NOT Penetrate other then these two??
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
Posts: 2070
Axis doesn't have the best AT options in the game
Posts: 1637
Generally heavier vehicles, it doesn't have the same Pen as a Panther despite being a dedicated tank destroyer with the Panther's gun, it has slightly worse than an SU-85. I tried to use it against a KV-8 and against an IS-2, it wasn't helpful. A Panther is a better choice because it doesn't crutch on Veterancy to be good, you can expect it to do it's job right out of the box.
The PTRS's are fine as they are. Whenever i'm up against Guard Infantry, I always have to be careful with my vehicles or the Guards will completely destroy them. Good range, good damage and fairly cheap; if anything, the PTRS should nerfed since it's ridiculously good for the price. Even in the hands of Conscripts, the PTRS's are extremely potent.
Posts: 18
Posts: 4928
so you complain about jagdpanzer not being able to penetrate an is2?
just wow...
soviet have to deal with "not being able to penetrate" every day.
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
Posts: 985 | Subs: 2
Posts: 36
4zis against the front armor of 1KT just some hit shows.
Play as Soviet, against heavy tanks is impossibility to counteract them, most people going surrender.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Kt has 400 armor. Is 2 375. So what exactly did you try to say there?
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Kt has 400 armor. Is 2 375. So what exactly did you try to say there?
 |
|
|
6 | ||
 |
|
|
176 | ||
 |
|
|
25 | ||
|
|
|
|
21 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
