Login

russian armor

M10-Not worthwhile?

30 Oct 2014, 18:38 PM
#21
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

Is that really so?

M10:

-higher armour
-higher penetration
-armour piercing rounds
-comes too late (probably biggest problem about it, 5cp would be better)

Puma:

-Higher acceleration.
-Ai capabilites
-smoke
-precision shot


And i would add vision, being able to spot for itself is a huge deal. That means you are effectively using that 50 range.
The "higher armour" is almost meaningless since you are not deflecting too much things besides small arm fire.
Don't get me wrong, the things is really cheap but i wouldn't see with bad eyes if it had the same CP requirements as the Stug-E (6CP).
30 Oct 2014, 18:39 PM
#22
avatar of AchtAchter

Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3

Yes you are right, with smoke the m10 would be much better.

The only thing that bounces of a wolverine is a puma at max range.:D
30 Oct 2014, 18:51 PM
#23
avatar of Hon3ynuts

Posts: 818

The M10 has much better penetration at range 140 to the pumas 80, but since it can't spot for itself it virtually never utilizes this range. At close range Puma has 160 pen to the M10s 180 pen, so not a large difference(more favoring the puma even considering targets), Though i think the pumas stronger simply b/c it can scout for you to avoid at guns and allied infantry support isn't very good.

The M10 is supposed to flank, but it can't do this b/c of its low HP pool when support is availible. Speed is among the best in the game though, but this is no advantage over the equally speedy panther or tanks with blitz at vet 1.


I think The M10 needs more Hp and a dispatch time decrease. This will let you get multiple m10s easier and flank your opponents. At the moment m10s pretty much go on suicide missions whenever there is serious fighting so Hp is what i think they need most.

Edit:also considering puma is 6 cps and they cost the same(plus USF always has less cps) M10 should come at 6 cps IMO

30 Oct 2014, 18:54 PM
#24
avatar of Romeo
Honorary Member Badge
Benefactor 115

Posts: 1970 | Subs: 5

I also think both of these units could use better accuracy.
30 Oct 2014, 19:13 PM
#25
avatar of Volsky

Posts: 344

You could kite easily in vCoH.

Not so in CoH2, and thus the M10 is blech.
30 Oct 2014, 19:28 PM
#26
avatar of Arclyte

Posts: 692

Is that really so?

M10:

-higher armour
-higher penetration
-armour piercing rounds
-comes too late (probably biggest problem about it, 5cp would be better)

Puma:

-Higher acceleration.
-Ai capabilites
-smoke
-precision shot


this is how you know someone is hopelessly biased
30 Oct 2014, 19:53 PM
#27
avatar of Omega_Warrior

Posts: 2561

Doesn't puma have 60 range?
30 Oct 2014, 19:58 PM
#28
avatar of DakkaIsMagic

Posts: 403

jump backJump back to quoted post30 Oct 2014, 18:54 PMRomeo
I also think both of these units could use better accuracy.


This, so much this. Gives it more value before its
Getting blitzed by tanks.
30 Oct 2014, 20:46 PM
#29
avatar of AchtAchter

Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3





Especially the US Forces need all the help they can get. Making this unit more reliable would definitely help.
A mode where it could increase it's sight would be super too, maybe decrease it's acceleration while using this mode, giving it a higher sight range so it can utilize it potential.
Call ins should be strong and helping you to form a strategy, right now the m10 seems to be an emergency option - when you can't afford a Jackson.

jump backJump back to quoted post30 Oct 2014, 19:28 PMArclyte


this is how you know someone is hopelessly biased


check the thread before you reply with nonsense ;)

30 Oct 2014, 20:49 PM
#30
avatar of butterfingers158

Posts: 239


Call ins should be strong and helping you to form a strategy, right now the m10 seems to be an emergency option - when you can't afford a Jackson.


Well from what I hear it used to be the M10 in American T4 and the Jackson was a call in for Armor Company. Then Relic realized the M10 couldn't hold up so instead of buffing it they just switched it with the Jackson*





*may be an oversimplification, working with second hand knowledge
30 Oct 2014, 20:56 PM
#31
avatar of frostbite

Posts: 593

idk sometimes I use this thing and it does well with tons of micro
lvl 3 u move super fast
good for smashing
use it at range vs p4
great for flanking tigers kt and things that have slow turret or no turret. I like this tank but need to take atleast 1 more hit if it cant get smokes
30 Oct 2014, 21:01 PM
#32
avatar of Romeo
Honorary Member Badge
Benefactor 115

Posts: 1970 | Subs: 5

If you told me also that armor company is just the commander where they put all the other abilities relic didn't feel like designing to make any sense at all, I would believe you. :)
30 Oct 2014, 21:38 PM
#33
avatar of What Doth Life?!
Patrion 27

Posts: 1664

I am still hoping we get the M18 Hellcat which had nearly double the top speed of a Panther.
30 Oct 2014, 21:55 PM
#34
avatar of theblitz6794

Posts: 395

I think a few small global buffs would be best. A small HP buff. A small range buff. A small visibility buff. A small accuracy buff. And a slight cost increase perhaps.

30 Oct 2014, 22:05 PM
#35
avatar of Bulgakov

Posts: 987

jump backJump back to quoted post30 Oct 2014, 19:28 PMArclyte


this is how you know someone is hopelessly biased



As the pot said to the kettle
30 Oct 2014, 22:51 PM
#36
avatar of Napalm

Posts: 1595 | Subs: 2

Puma range is better, fyi~
30 Oct 2014, 23:07 PM
#37
avatar of Omega_Warrior

Posts: 2561

I think a few small global buffs would be best. A small HP buff. A small range buff. A small visibility buff. A small accuracy buff. And a slight cost increase perhaps.

I definitely think it can use a range buff. For instance, when facing off against a panther it has 0 advantages that it can exploit. I really don't know why it doesn't have the same global 60 range that almost all tank destroyer units have.

I don't care if they make it cost more. I rather have something that works vs. something that's cheap.
30 Oct 2014, 23:10 PM
#38
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post30 Oct 2014, 22:51 PMNapalm
Puma range is better, fyi~


Both have 50, but Puma got better sight so it actually can benefit from it independently.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Livestreams

unknown 65
United Kingdom 360
United States 34
United States 33
unknown 11

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

841 users are online: 841 guests
0 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49122
Welcome our newest member, Harda621
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM