Login

russian armor

Easy Eight

  • This thread is locked
PAGES (11)down
24 Jul 2014, 21:54 PM
#101
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

Well, it won't reliably bounce these paks and tigers.

It could get little less penetration, but I don't believe its survivability is any issue considering that US have nothing that can take hit and fight anything heavier then light tanks except this single tank.
24 Jul 2014, 21:58 PM
#102
avatar of wooof

Posts: 950 | Subs: 1

i dont think anyone is questioning its durability. the fact it is better AT and AI than the t34/85 (already a solid all around tank) is what makes the cost/value of this unit questionable. atleast the sherman has to choose between HE or AP rounds. the easy eight essentially has both all the time
24 Jul 2014, 22:04 PM
#103
avatar of Strummingbird
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 952 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Jul 2014, 21:54 PMKatitof
Well, it won't reliably bounce these paks and tigers.

It could get little less penetration, but I don't believe its survivability is any issue considering that US have nothing that can take hit and fight anything heavier then light tanks except this single tank.


There's nothing inherently wrong with a heavy-medium or heavy US tank, it just needs to be priced accordingly and arrive at the right CP values. Whether the E8 is is debatable.
24 Jul 2014, 22:09 PM
#104
avatar of braciszek

Posts: 2053

Am i the only one who used the M4C as a comparison for the E8?

They use the same gun.

Right? (checking now, it looked similar when i was looking at the numbers...

It would be strange to modify one's gun, but not the other...
24 Jul 2014, 22:16 PM
#105
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

It would be strange to modify one's gun, but not the other...


ZiS-3 and SU-76

SU-85 and T34/85

ML-20 howitzer and ISU-152.

PaK43 and Elephant.

Jagdpanzer4 and Panther.

Just to name a couple examples.
24 Jul 2014, 22:21 PM
#106
avatar of braciszek

Posts: 2053

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Jul 2014, 22:16 PMKatitof


ZiS-3 and SU-76

SU-85 and T34/85

ML-20 howitzer and ISU-152.

PaK43 and Elephant.

Jagdpanzer4 and Panther.

Just to name a couple examples.


Whatever. I see no point in changing it that way.
24 Jul 2014, 22:24 PM
#107
avatar of ferrozoica

Posts: 208

Can someone please tell me what bonus this thing gets on the move??
24 Jul 2014, 22:28 PM
#108
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

Can someone please tell me what bonus this thing gets on the move??


What bonus?

It gets 50% less accuracy and 2x more scatter as every other tank.
24 Jul 2014, 22:29 PM
#109
avatar of Strummingbird
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 952 | Subs: 1

Incorrect- accuracy on the move is 0.75.
24 Jul 2014, 22:32 PM
#110
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 1225

Just had a long game against Elite rifle again with multiple panther on Sherman engagements, and if the Panther with its shitty accuracy and ROF is ahead at all, the margin is very slim. Coupled with the fact that with tech/opportunity costs it will be at a 1 on 2 fight, a hotfix is due.
24 Jul 2014, 22:53 PM
#111
avatar of austerlitz

Posts: 1705

Just had a long game against Elite rifle again with multiple panther on Sherman engagements, and if the Panther with its shitty accuracy and ROF is ahead at all, the margin is very slim. Coupled with the fact that with tech/opportunity costs it will be at a 1 on 2 fight, a hotfix is due.


Exactly i've used panther vs this and its often touch and go when ur panther's shit accuracy fails u.And the fact that he'll have 2 to ur 1 usually makes this even worse.I just hate panthers missing shots and poor damage..even if u made a flank its marginal effect at best.Add its useless AI and u can only rage at these mediums sometimes.
24 Jul 2014, 23:19 PM
#112
avatar of Bubalo

Posts: 64

Whats the total fuel cost to call one in compared to a panther?
24 Jul 2014, 23:27 PM
#113
avatar of Strummingbird
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 952 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Jul 2014, 23:19 PMBubalo
Whats the total fuel cost to call one in compared to a panther?


No tech, just 135 for the tank at 9CPs.

Wehr Panther costs 45+50+60+35+175, or 365 if you skip every tier except 1 and 4. No CP cost.

OKW Panther costs (80+175)*1.5, or 382 if you don't convert or scavenge.
24 Jul 2014, 23:35 PM
#114
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 1225



Exactly i've used panther vs this and its often touch and go when ur panther's shit accuracy fails u.And the fact that he'll have 2 to ur 1 usually makes this even worse.I just hate panthers missing shots and poor damage..even if u made a flank its marginal effect at best.Add its useless AI and u can only rage at these mediums sometimes.

Ye part of Panthers problem is that its a purely defensive investment with one sole utility. Unless you actually get to kill up to two enemy mediums/one heavy (call ins that is) you will never ever amortise its cost since you can't really hurt infantry - even though there are worse perfomers still in that regard - SU 85 I am looking at you. Of course it might have some deterrance value but with Panthers current performance this is shaky at best. In pure economic terms the Special Ops command Panther might still represent the best investment since it does not require tech. But gosh does it come late, and in 9 out of 10 games you cannot leave that gaping hole where your AT capability should be.
24 Jul 2014, 23:38 PM
#115
avatar of Strummingbird
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 952 | Subs: 1

Spec ops Panther comes just at the right time if you know your enemy is going for call in spam. It's my favourite of the Panther variants in-game for that reason.
24 Jul 2014, 23:39 PM
#116
avatar of braciszek

Posts: 2053

Nvm, cant do simple math right.
24 Jul 2014, 23:50 PM
#117
avatar of ThoseDeafMutes

Posts: 1026

Maths bro

3 * 0.66... = 2
2 * 1.33... = 2.66...
2 * 1.5 = 3

If you subtract 1/3 from a number, you need to add *half* of the new number to get the old number again. Not one third, as demonstrated above.
24 Jul 2014, 23:52 PM
#118
avatar of Strummingbird
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 952 | Subs: 1



OKW starts with 40 fuel, so thats why you didnt include that, but why did you multiply by 1.5? OKW fuel penalty is 0.66% , 2 fuel for a normal 3.

I thought it would be about 340 fuel. (1.3333333)


If OKW gets 2 out of 3 gas units per second, would the cost of fuel units not be half as much again over the sticker price? Assuming 2 is the baseline, +1 more would be +50% of normal income... Unless I've made a very elementary math mistake, in which case I apologize...
24 Jul 2014, 23:56 PM
#119
avatar of braciszek

Posts: 2053

Nope, im just really stupid. Nevermind.

Just ignore that silly inquiry...
25 Jul 2014, 00:05 AM
#120
avatar of Bubalo

Posts: 64



No tech, just 135 for the tank at 9CPs.

Wehr Panther costs 45+50+60+35+175, or 365 if you skip every tier except 1 and 4. No CP cost.

OKW Panther costs (80+175)*1.5, or 382 if you don't convert or scavenge.


This is why there needs to be a tech requirement.
PAGES (11)down
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

620 users are online: 620 guests
1 post in the last 24h
6 posts in the last week
36 posts in the last month
Registered members: 48939
Welcome our newest member, Ellmjnhiem
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM