Posts: 1130
And if a sturm pio pulls of a flank you've generally lost your Maxim because of its horrible retreat animation. I lose Maxims way more often than MG42s.
Posts: 381
Posts: 627
QQ I am bad player
Posts: 1595 | Subs: 2
Posts: 1439
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1130
Posts: 84
I like imperial dane suggestion by nerfing the range of the maxim perhaps it should be around the kubelwagons range
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
I agree
Maxim should have range and arc reduced while mg42 a bit wider arc and a bit of a range. Asymetric faction design and all that
2 
Posts: 2181
Posts: 461 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1130
Dont reduce the range, it will just get gunned down from range then.
A slight damage reduction is mroe in order.
Posts: 627
I like imperial dane suggestion by nerfing the range of the maxim perhaps it should be around the kubelwagons range
Posts: 1130
What.
As if getting rifle nades off on maxims wasn't easy enough already, now we want to be able to rifle nade without getting shot at at all?
Posts: 9
I still argue that MG teams and AT teams shouldn't be able to cap sectors. If they removed that, there's NO WAY anyone would spam Maxims BUT the Maxim would remain powerful. Ta-daaaa
Posts: 1225
Posts: 476
Meanwhile, it may be placebo, but can´t you manually target which entity you want your squad to shoot, just like with snipers? Kill gunner, wipe mg, profit.
Posts: 503
Yes because model count is the only factor that determines durability right? The fact that the average DPS of a grenadier squad is 1.5x higher than that of a conscript squad does not factor into it, right?
Posts: 1221 | Subs: 41
and what about the molotov-factor? ofc grens have riflenades but a naded maxim is till able to hold its position and shoot at the enemy. try that with an mg42 that got 'toved. if its not dead already it will be in a matter of seconds
Posts: 1162
 |
|
|
43 | ||
|
|
|
|
9 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
89 | ||
 |
|
|
30 | ||
 |
|
|
27 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
0 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
