OKW Panther
Posts: 208
Taking aside the fact that it is very cost inefficient and even if (when...) the Panther receives a buff, I feel that it is just not needed - the Puma does a better job against light/medium armour and the Jagdpanzer/Jagdtiger do a good enough job against the heavier stuff.
What should be in there instead?
I want to say the Panzer IV but this is also somewhat un-original... The Hummel/Nashorn, the StuH? Maybe even another infantry unit?
Thoughts?
Posts: 644
Posts: 4928
I guess with all the cheese strategies, people forget the true might that Soviets may have access to late-game.
Posts: 760
Posts: 1571
or a Panzer III 75mm short.
Posts: 4928
T1 Building (10)
T2 Research (45)
T2 Building (15)
T2 Vehicles (45)
T3 Research (55)
T4 Research (60)
T4 Building (30)
T4 Panther (175)
Total Cost: 435 Fuel
Posts: 2053
It's really expensive and difficult to get as any faction! I'm not sure about OKW, but I recall it easily costing over 400 fuel for Ostheer. The costs I calculated were:
T1 Building (10)
T2 Research (45)
T2 Building (15)
T2 Vehicles (45)
T3 Research (55)
T4 Research (60)
T4 Building (30)
T4 Panther (175)
Total Cost: 435 Fuel
It also cost OKW about 405 fuel.
Except the price per panther is even more expensive.
Posts: 760
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
It also cost OKW about 405 fuel.
Except the price per panther is even more expensive.
Not really if you include possible scavenged fuel and fuel conversion.
I'm able to pump panther around 14 min, which is much faster then other Wehr.
OKW panther is even viable for 1v1 as you'll always have the building, its just a matter of choice, do you go for puma+stuka or panther.
Posts: 807
Not really if you include possible scavenged fuel and fuel conversion.
I'm able to pump panther around 14 min, which is much faster then other Wehr.
OKW panther is even viable for 1v1 as you'll always have the building, its just a matter of choice, do you go for puma+stuka or panther.
14 minutes if you're playing against a dead chicken maybe. Or build NOTHING that will require fuel + building directly T3 + giving fuel conversion pretty soon. That will leave you with just infantry on the field + 1 panther in the middle game (maybe). Wow, what an army.
Yesterday I lost 2 OKW Panthers against 3 t34/85 in a sec - how did they die so quiclky.... beats me. My luck was that it was a 3v3 and my Ostheer partners covered the gap, otherwise it would have been gg.
Okw Panther, Ostheer panther, whatever panther.... is still an underperforming unit. Even ostheer players don't use it more than before. The only true panther users are OKW players because they don't really have other choice, but for OKW it is even more underperforming because OKW is immersed in poverty and a Panther will be verry hard to replace.
Posts: 2779
175 (265) Fuel for OKW panther is beyond insane for such a shitty tank.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
14 minutes if you're playing against a dead chicken maybe. Or build NOTHING that will require fuel + building directly T3 + giving fuel conversion pretty soon. That will leave you with just infantry on the field + 1 panther in the middle game (maybe). Wow, what an army.
Yesterday I lost 2 OKW Panthers against 3 t34/85 in a sec - how did they die so quiclky.... beats me. My luck was that it was a 3v3 and my Ostheer partners covered the gap, otherwise it would have been gg.
Okw Panther, Ostheer panther, whatever panther.... is still an underperforming unit. Even ostheer players don't use it more than before. The only true panther users are OKW players because they don't really have other choice, but for OKW it is even more underperforming because OKW is immersed in poverty and a Panther will be verry hard to replace.
Its not like you'll need tons of early armor against soviets anyway and in US case it pretty much depends on his choice, but generally you'll want that puma vs USF asap.(not flak ht, this one is greatly overrated).
Posts: 627
Shrecks and Racketen are enough to deal with all the early light vehicles. Shermans can be forced off the same way- though it will incur losses.
Personally, I like to go for a Jagdpanzer instead. Better reload, great range, cheaper. You can go T1/4 and into a Jagd and have it in time for enemy armour that needs it. Volks, Sturm, Obers and Jager are plenty to win infantry fights.
Posts: 1702
As okw, it is always better to just spam pumas rather than get a jagpanzer.
Posts: 1042
There were the Panther A,D and G models, I'm not intimate with the differences between them but I'm sure the differences would be big enough to warrant a differentiation and thus inclusion of some kind of different model.
Posts: 1042
Posts: 1439
Posts: 542
Anyway, regarding the role of the Panther in OKW army. The Puma is great against light vehicles and can even help against medium tanks when it is not on its own, but you have to be very careful with it and without veterancy it is not very reliable at damaging tanks, unless you can get into the rear.
The Panther can take at least a few shots and is usually a bit more reliable against bigger tanks than the Puma (although as I said it could be better).
Now the Jagdpanzer can actually do the same, maybe even better to some degree. However it has a few weaknesses; first, it is more vulnerable if it gets flanked, second it has trouble on maps with a lot of obstacles where your enemy might be around corners etc., third it actually has problems to fight really big Soviet tanks head on. While it can do fine against an IS-2 by just staying out of range, it does not do very well against SU-85s and ISU-152s.
The Panther may do better in some of these scenarios, although as I agree it could perform better as well. In situations where the Panther doesn't suffice anymore, especially in team games, you probably have then the King Tiger or Jagdtiger, but those things have such restrictive costs that they are also mostly only seen in team games anyway.
Posts: 807
Howabout a different version on the Panther for OKW?
There were the Panther A,D and G models, I'm not intimate with the differences between them but I'm sure the differences would be big enough to warrant a differentiation and thus inclusion of some kind of different model.
Excellent idea, by the way.
And I propose Panther A - a lighter model of Panther. It should cost less while being more expensive than a PZIV, and have also some AI abilities. Overall, it can be closer to a PZIV performances.
Result: everybody happy.
Posts: 1439
In 1v1 I had US player attacking me with like 6 Shermans and I managed to win this engagement with the help of Rocket AT.
You say OKW is fuel starved but only because it got mechanics to negate this. If you're not using salvage or resource conversion than who you got to blame?
Check this replay and see how many tanks I managed to field:
It was 2v2, I know, but still.
Damn, there was a patch. I don't think this one is working anymore.
Livestreams
24 | |||||
13 | |||||
6 | |||||
291 | |||||
178 | |||||
5 | |||||
2 | |||||
2 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1099614.642-1
- 5.280162.633+8
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.271108.715+22
- 9.721440.621+3
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger