Login

russian armor

Current balance for both faction

26 May 2014, 03:22 AM
#1
avatar of nwglfls

Posts: 240

General:
1.Please display support weapon health bar.

2.Avoid map only has no open area, for instance, Starlingrad, a good map will contain most of the good elements, close range combat, open ground for armor movement,etc. that map makes player extremely hard to control their armor unit.

3. why call-in should not cost fuel? remember, call in unit doesnt need anytime to produce, if i can spend most of fuel just for call in unit, why i bother spend additional fuel for tier building, this makes tier building less important in the game, i would suggest increase the manpower cost of call-in unit, but reduce the fuel cost. the whole point of tier building is:
you spend fuel, you can spend less manpower.
but call-in unit with fuel cost ruin this rule.

Soviet:
1. conscript is okay now, but early-game penal flame thrower spam should be looked at, Grenadier has to wait for phase 1 to get MG, six-man squad SVT rifle plus flamer thrower makes them quite powerful in early game, the penal manpower cost should be higher, around 320, i suggest.

2. Soviet mine is quite frustrating, sometimes wipe out whole squad, make soviet mine like Vcoh, it will only reduce the health of full health squad but kill solider when the squad is low health.

3. Soviet sniper range should be decreased,only 80% of german sniper range, two-men squad already increase its survivability, makes it very hard to counter thorough out the game, German player never use sniper to counter sniper because same cost, same range, but only only man.

4. ISU-152 range should be decreased, but increase its rotating speed, this long range assault gun just can see too far.

5. KV-8 sometimes kill infantry instantly, sometimes do little damage, my suggestion is KV-8 will reduce the health of squad first, the entity of that squad takes the damage evenly until the health reduce a certain level, solider will die.

German:
1.Grenadier can fight well when in cover, but panzergrenadier is the least cost-efficient unit now, it deserves same armor like shock troop.

2.Panzerfaust range should be increased a little bit,.

3.Tiger killing infantry quite effectively, it will wipe out squad in couple of shots, i am not quite sure how to fix that, because tiger is quite expensive, allow tiger to switch between HE and AP round?

4. reduce the range of elephant as well, elephant deserves some Anti-infantry ability, it is a quite huge investment, comparing with ISU-152 which can both counter armor and infantry.

26 May 2014, 06:38 AM
#2
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 807

Balance? What balance?

26 May 2014, 12:07 PM
#3
avatar of vietnamabc

Posts: 1063

Soviet has some problem too, u know:
1. Going penal + flamethrower spam means u got absolutely no defense against SC. Penal scales very bad in mid and late game.
4. Ele has the same view range and it can get the scope.

German
2. Lol no, short of IS-2, panzerfaust crit every Soviet armor while AT grenade sometimes can't even pen the Stug.
4. Ele + MG/Stug and Soviet can't do anything. ISU only counter tanks if it is far away, T-34s have trouble penning Ele rear.
26 May 2014, 12:48 PM
#4
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 807

Soviet has some problem too, u know:
1. Going penal + flamethrower spam means u got absolutely no defense against SC. Penal scales very bad in mid and late game.


Why are you worried? Try everything else. It's easy.


4. Ele has the same view range and it can get the scope.


Yeah, tz tz tz.... nerf the fucking buster! Germans should not be allowed to have a reliable AT against hevies.


German
2. Lol no, short of IS-2, panzerfaust crit every Soviet armor while AT grenade sometimes can't even pen the Stug.


Right, let's nerf even more PzGrens. Hell, no, better let's make schrecks cost 200 AMO!


4. Ele + MG/Stug and Soviet can't do anything. ISU only counter tanks if it is far away, T-34s have trouble penning Ele rear.


Oh...poor soviets... you make me cry.... There is one tactic they cannot trololol... Really? You didn't play enough.
26 May 2014, 13:44 PM
#5
avatar of Burts

Posts: 1702



Why are you worried? Try everything else. It's easy.



Yeah, tz tz tz.... nerf the fucking buster! Germans should not be allowed to have a reliable AT against hevies.



Right, let's nerf even more PzGrens. Hell, no, better let's make schrecks cost 200 AMO!



Oh...poor soviets... you make me cry.... There is one tactic they cannot trololol... Really? You didn't play enough.


says the guy that has a 5 digit rank as soviets and doesnt even have a 1v1 rank as soviets...
Neo
26 May 2014, 13:46 PM
#6
avatar of Neo

Posts: 471

jump backJump back to quoted post26 May 2014, 13:44 PMBurts


says the guy that has a 5 digit rank as soviets and doesnt even have a 1v1 rank as soviets...


That's unfair. His rank as Germans isn't that far away from being 5 digits either...
26 May 2014, 18:46 PM
#7
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

@SSHeini if you wanted to "troll" you are doing it wrong. Some of your quotes don´t even make sense.


General
3- Way too big of a change and dunno how it will repercute on the meta. No map control? It doesn´t matter, play a mp atrittion and go for call ins. (I still prefer the TA gettting some fuel requirements with a lesser penalization while alive)

Soviets:

1- By the time he gets muni for flamer (depending on map and map control) you should be close for searching BP1.
Penals scale bad in midgame and you can control them with some micro and 222.

3- Nope. If anything, blobing sniper should be penalized "vcoh" style. Decrease cloaking capabilities, decrease RoF, your choice.

5- That´s not how flamers work.

German:

1- PG feels like old glasscannon Penals. Just reduce cost if they are not "cost effective".
2- Nope.
26 May 2014, 19:29 PM
#8
avatar of OZtheWiZARD

Posts: 1439

I'm really tired of this utter Sniper Soviet bullshit.
I don't fucking care about asymmetrical balance. Relic can take it and shove it. I couldn't care less. I want balanced game!


By the way:

I just found out that new American army will have Sniper team with 2 snipers and 2 observers in it.
4 men Sniper squad! Yey!
26 May 2014, 19:46 PM
#9
avatar of rappit

Posts: 17

I'm really tired of this utter Sniper Soviet bullshit.
I don't fucking care about asymmetrical balance. Relic can take it and shove it. I couldn't care less. I want balanced game!


By the way:

I just found out that new American army will have Sniper team with 2 snipers and 2 observers in it.
4 men Sniper squad! Yey!


It's not exactly a sniper team, I think. But I do agree with you that soviet sniper has very little to counter it right now.
26 May 2014, 20:08 PM
#10
avatar of OZtheWiZARD

Posts: 1439

Last game I had scout car parked literally in the face of Soviet sniper and sniper managed to run away to safety.
The other game I had 2 PzIV (!) and I am absolutely serious about it shooting at sniper squad (I right click it) and it managed to survive 3 shoots, lost 1 man and run away.
27 May 2014, 04:04 AM
#11
avatar of wongtp

Posts: 647

yes, snipers needs to be worked out, but i dont see how conscripts are actually okay. they are not. they perform fairly only against vanilla grens, badly microed assault grens, osttruppen and pioneers.

upgraded grens completely outclass them at all ranges and can take 2 conscript squads easily with rifle grenades.

the only reason why they seem to be able to run around freely now is because of the difficulty in countering snipers, current trend of maxim spam and isu152 capable of killing them from range.

fix these and soviet infantry will crumble.
27 May 2014, 05:27 AM
#12
avatar of BeltFedWombat
Patrion 14

Posts: 951

I just found out that new American army will have Sniper team with 2 snipers and 2 observers in it.
4 men Sniper squad! Yey!


At the risk of summoning the NDA gods down upon me, no they don't.
27 May 2014, 05:34 AM
#13
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 807

Burts and Neo

I appologize to your fanboyism. I hurt its feelings.
27 May 2014, 05:46 AM
#14
avatar of ThoseDeafMutes

Posts: 1026


By the way:

I just found out that new American army will have Sniper team with 2 snipers and 2 observers in it.
4 men Sniper squad! Yey!


I'm in the Alpha and actually you're wrong, it's a 200 man sniper team and each model fires faster than a german sniper.
27 May 2014, 05:56 AM
#15
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8



snip


You'd better edit that, because you know, NDA and stuff.
27 May 2014, 06:01 AM
#16
avatar of jeesuspietari

Posts: 168



I'm in the Alpha and actually you're wrong, it's a 200 man sniper team and each model fires faster than a german sniper.


I like this idea of sniper teams with some more staying power but on the other hand it might lead to even more sniper spam
27 May 2014, 11:09 AM
#17
avatar of OZtheWiZARD

Posts: 1439

Another thing regarding sniper balance no one really consider that much.
If you build 2 Soviet sniper teams and attack with both of them a single Grenadier squad it will cause the retreat as the second salvo will wipe the squad.
Now if you use this against Soviets and use double German snipers you will only kill the third of the squad meaning you will have to shoot once more to threaten with squad wipe. I guess it's kind of OK as German sniper shoots faster but in reality 2 Soviet sniper squads will force a retreat after single shoot which means less German infantry presence on the battlefield.
I wouldn't really mind this if I was able to counter them effectively but unfortunately that's not the case. Even in 1v1 at the time my scout car is out there will be Guard squad waiting to counter it.
27 May 2014, 11:13 AM
#18
avatar of Burts

Posts: 1702

1v1 snipers are fine.

Keep in mind that even non upgraded grens can do decent damage to soviet snipers at range. G43 countering snipers might be over, but now use LMG 42 instead.
If he gets more than one sniper in 1v1, you can just make lots of grens and just simply walk forward, yes you might have to retreat 1-2 squads. But in the end you will force the snipers away.



Keep in mind that a gren squad almost does 2x more damage than a cons squad at range, when you factor the extra damage, the soviet sniper doens't really have any survivability advantage at all.
27 May 2014, 21:01 PM
#19
avatar of Jaigen

Posts: 1130

jump backJump back to quoted post27 May 2014, 11:13 AMBurts
1v1 snipers are fine.

Keep in mind that even non upgraded grens can do decent damage to soviet snipers at range. G43 countering snipers might be over, but now use LMG 42 instead.
If he gets more than one sniper in 1v1, you can just make lots of grens and just simply walk forward, yes you might have to retreat 1-2 squads. But in the end you will force the snipers away.



Keep in mind that a gren squad almost does 2x more damage than a cons squad at range, when you factor the extra damage, the soviet sniper doens't really have any survivability advantage at all.


are high or something? the previous g43 had 40 range and 85% FOTM in fact a lmg squad has even less chance of catching a sniper team then a regular gren squad.
27 May 2014, 22:40 PM
#20
avatar of Kronosaur0s

Posts: 1701

hmm..has anyone battled 2v2 where soviets do Sniper > Guards spam > KV2 / ISU152 spam on that loved map called Semosiky? Literally, I had 0 infantry at late game, not kidding lol.

Squad wipes seems balanced.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

894 users are online: 894 guests
2 posts in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
40 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49077
Welcome our newest member, juliavargascom
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM