Soviets still have no infantry based AT
Posts: 875 | Subs: 6
They really need to give Penals a Bazooka upgrade for example because currently there are so many gaps in the counter system without anti infantry based AT. They also really should rework Anti Tank grenades to make them more like stickies, really short range or (medium range that gets cancelled if the vehicle drives out of range during animation.) but yet does lots of damage. So it's harder to land AT grenades because you can't just oorah and throw it head on without any effort, but with short range you'll have to flank and out play your opponent, but when you do will be rewarded with the ability to actually damage vehicles with Soviet infantry, which would be fantastic. Because currently Soviets are way too Commander specific relying on the Commander heavy tank call ins to deal with the German armour on the base faction.
Posts: 4785 | Subs: 3
Posts: 254
;(
Posts: 1701
Conscripts AT Nade
Posts: 2053
Posts: 254
Has anyone tested out the new tutorial? The PTRS in it, if the Guards PTRS was like that, then no one would complain about this issue anymore.
is there a new tutorial?
Posts: 449
Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
Guards can fuck up a tank pretty bad bro
Not since last patch. Now pretty much all tanks are much more lethal against infantry and the PTRS got a range nerf for some reason.
Posts: 4785 | Subs: 3
Not since last patch. Now pretty much all tanks are much more lethal against infantry and the PTRS got a range nerf for some reason.
Stun it and gun it
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Stun it and gun it
Not a single PTRS is needed for that.
Oh, you meant TWP?
Posts: 4785 | Subs: 3
Posts: 195
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
random question, do guards have armour of 1 at the moment? so you can merge cons into them with no penalty?
Yes.
Shocks are the only infantry in game that have armor and for a good reason as they are completely ineffective unless they stick ppsh into germans butthole.
Posts: 254
Posts: 2053
is there a new tutorial?
Yes, there is. The tutorial tells you to pick up a dropped PTRS and it fires rapid-fire. It actually felt useful.
Posts: 308
Even if Penals get a bazooka, not much will change. They need to reduce the aim times of the PTRS because they're useless against a good player.
Posts: 440
Can Germans get a Jagdpanzer IV or something as good as SU-85 for the same cost? Then we'll talk.
Posts: 2053
All the AT options available and you want hand-held heavy AT too? Penals with captured schreks (not hard to make happen btw) are already crazy powerful.
Can Germans get a Jagdpanzer IV or something as good as SU-85 for the same cost? Then we'll talk.
Replacing it with the panther, sure. It would make soviets lives much easier flanking nonturreted vehicles. No seriously, that is a DOWNGRADE.
Posts: 1571
eg. Zis-3: 6 pop, 280 MP, built time 50%
Posts: 440
Replacing it with the panther, sure. It would make soviets lives much easier flanking nonturreted vehicles. No seriously, that is a DOWNGRADE.
Didn't realize Panthers were the same cost as SU-85, oh wait...that's you not knowing how to read? K.
Livestreams
28 | |||||
16 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1101614.642+2
- 5.305114.728+1
- 6.916405.693-2
- 7.271108.715+22
- 8.721440.621+3
- 9.1041674.607-2
- 10.17146.788+1
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
8 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Rodfg15
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM