HOLY POTATOES !!! patch 3/25
24 Mar 2014, 17:54 PM
#1
Posts: 1702
watch this.
24 Mar 2014, 18:02 PM
#2
Posts: 344
Aw man. I'll never get my hands clean after fapping to that.
Gustaaaaaaaaaaaa.
Gustaaaaaaaaaaaa.
Pocketsize: "I can't wait till they add british to CoH: O; the extreme forces leveled by the new imbalances will create a black hole around the servers that destroys half of Canada."
24 Mar 2014, 18:05 PM
#3
Posts: 231
50 more fuel for soviet t3 and t4 seems expensive but who knows what else is being changed in the patch. Like all patches, we'll see soon enough how the balance is.
24 Mar 2014, 18:08 PM
#4
Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
Very nice changes.
My only concern is the call-in tanks. With such heavy costs of teching, is there any reason not to go T1-T2 -> Tiger / IS-2 / T34/85s?
For example, with the new teching costs it will be more expensive to call in a single T34/76 than it is to call in a tiger.
My only concern is the call-in tanks. With such heavy costs of teching, is there any reason not to go T1-T2 -> Tiger / IS-2 / T34/85s?
For example, with the new teching costs it will be more expensive to call in a single T34/76 than it is to call in a tiger.
24 Mar 2014, 18:12 PM
#5
24 Mar 2014, 18:13 PM
#6
Posts: 133
Call ins are going to dominate the game and Soviet t3 is going to be useless unless they've changed T34 and T70 too.
24 Mar 2014, 18:16 PM
#7
Posts: 1637
I like it and I hate it. Total cost for your first T34/76 is nuts. Same with P4s/Panthers. They need to tweak call ins I think.
Panzer Shreks although it appears it will be easier to kill them are going to be that much more painful.
Call ins Call ins Call ins I think....we shall see.
Panzer Shreks although it appears it will be easier to kill them are going to be that much more painful.
Call ins Call ins Call ins I think....we shall see.
The PTRS's are fine as they are. Whenever i'm up against Guard Infantry, I always have to be careful with my vehicles or the Guards will completely destroy them. Good range, good damage and fairly cheap; if anything, the PTRS should nerfed since it's ridiculously good for the price. Even in the hands of Conscripts, the PTRS's are extremely potent.
24 Mar 2014, 18:16 PM
#8
Posts: 879
It looks like the game is gonna really slow down. If you want to attack something, you're going to have to make sure you have the exact right pathing to stay in cover all the time or you're going to get shredded.
Expect Men of War like pro replays. I don't think the casual crowd is going to like this...at all. But us 1v1 players will, should make things a LOT more interesting and tactical.
Expect Men of War like pro replays. I don't think the casual crowd is going to like this...at all. But us 1v1 players will, should make things a LOT more interesting and tactical.
24 Mar 2014, 18:26 PM
#9
Posts: 177
It looks like the game is gonna really slow down. If you want to attack something, you're going to have to make sure you have the exact right pathing to stay in cover all the time or you're going to get shredded.
Expect Men of War like pro replays. I don't think the casual crowd is going to like this...at all. But us 1v1 players will, should make things a LOT more interesting and tactical.
I like it. The game needed to slow down.
24 Mar 2014, 18:27 PM
#10
Posts: 248
Great changes! I really like the idea of slowing the game down and giving the early/mid a chance to really shine.
24 Mar 2014, 18:32 PM
#11
Posts: 879
This isn't going to be good for Sovs at all...I'm not sure they've thought through the full ramifications of this. Who has the best territory denial stuff? Ostheer...Who needs to take risks flanking out of cover? Who has the longer ranged mortar which can get Vet 3 instantly with a certain commander, which also has G43s, excellent for shredding flanking units from long range? (except for the Soviet doctrinal mortar?)
Hopefully I'm wrong.
Hopefully I'm wrong.
24 Mar 2014, 18:34 PM
#12
Posts: 187
Very nice changes.
My only concern is the call-in tanks. With such heavy costs of teching, is there any reason not to go T1-T2 -> Tiger / IS-2 / T34/85s?
For example, with the new teching costs it will be more expensive to call in a single T34/76 than it is to call in a tiger.
We will have to wait and try out the new patch but you have a point. Least this may see some valuable changes to T3 units later on if they are going to be that much more expensive to reach.
24 Mar 2014, 18:35 PM
#13
1 Posts: 928
The game will probably be a bit unbalanced at first, but its still a change worth having. Now they can finally balance the game from a solid base.
24 Mar 2014, 18:35 PM
#14
Posts: 1637
This isn't going to be good for Sovs at all...I'm not sure they've thought through the full ramifications of this. Who has the best territory denial stuff? Ostheer...Who needs to take risks flanking out of cover? Who has the longer ranged mortar which can get Vet 3 instantly with a certain commander, which also has G43s, excellent for shredding flanking units from long range? (except for the Soviet doctrinal mortar?)
Hopefully I'm wrong.
Conversely think about Osts Infantry preservation issues? How ANNOYING would it be to keep Pgrens alive till armor comes out and with Infantry just whipes them out....
Going to be a brave new world with Ost having the early game advantage....
The PTRS's are fine as they are. Whenever i'm up against Guard Infantry, I always have to be careful with my vehicles or the Guards will completely destroy them. Good range, good damage and fairly cheap; if anything, the PTRS should nerfed since it's ridiculously good for the price. Even in the hands of Conscripts, the PTRS's are extremely potent.
24 Mar 2014, 18:37 PM
#15
Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13
Well, it may mean Grens can now actually stop a con squad from molotoving the MG rather than conscripts running to the MG to and ignoring the Grens on the approach via a flank.
Also makes Panzergrenadier far more vulnerable than ever.
Also makes Panzergrenadier far more vulnerable than ever.
24 Mar 2014, 18:43 PM
#16
1 
Posts: 1006
wow those are important changes but I think I love them.
Seems kind of odd to have t3-4 delayed but didn't talk about call in tanks if they got delayed or not.
Seems kind of odd to have t3-4 delayed but didn't talk about call in tanks if they got delayed or not.
24 Mar 2014, 18:45 PM
#17
Posts: 187
Really need the full notes!
24 Mar 2014, 19:13 PM
#18
5 Posts: 16697 | Subs: 12
Nice vid, Peter! 
24 Mar 2014, 19:18 PM
#19
Posts: 760
I like that they're making coh2 more tactical and less arcady and were listening the the player base, but given relic's track record this is to good to be true they might ruin it with dlc again. But who knows maybe they learned their lesson.
24 Mar 2014, 19:20 PM
#20
Posts: 1701
G43 will become destroyer of worlds! LOL
Blaue Division - The best corp
BPX - Black Phoenix, Clan leader.
BPX - Black Phoenix, Clan leader.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
SHOUT IT OUT!
LimaOscarMike: My laptop can't even run COH3. Should I get them on my Series X or is it dead yet?
Today, 05:10 AM
Today, 05:10 AM
Rosbone: One of my last major gripes about Coh3. Price is still too high I feel for growth. But progress is always good.
Today, 04:43 AM
Today, 04:43 AM
Rosbone: I am not 100% sure but I think Relic actually fixed up the skirmish menus a little last patch. If so, thank you and keep it coming.
Today, 04:39 AM
Today, 04:39 AM
Osinyagov: Suddenly, coh2 is slowly dying, but you can play it, playerbase still big enough
09 Apr 2025, 17:00 PM
09 Apr 2025, 17:00 PM
SupremeStefan: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3457737797
04 Apr 2025, 12:42 PM
04 Apr 2025, 12:42 PM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone not dead yet. when that happens the font will switch to Papyrus 
02 Apr 2025, 00:16 AM
02 Apr 2025, 00:16 AM
aerafield: yeah I already prepared my "Can't believe there's comic mode for the 10 daily visitors even on this April 1st" 
01 Apr 2025, 20:29 PM
01 Apr 2025, 20:29 PM
Lady Xenarra: Does anyone else think that USF needs buffs? It feels like they’re on life support sometimes
01 Apr 2025, 02:36 AM
01 Apr 2025, 02:36 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone Ahh I missed that memo. I still think its a bad decision though. Adds frustration for players and isnt gonna make them that much money
27 Mar 2025, 15:46 PM
27 Mar 2025, 15:46 PM
Rosbone: It is also good they left it free until after the free to play weekend. Points for that.
27 Mar 2025, 09:34 AM
27 Mar 2025, 09:34 AM
Rosbone: But I agree, the cost to get a full decent Coh game pushing $115 US is not the best idea. Especially when it needs so much more work for casuals.
27 Mar 2025, 09:32 AM
27 Mar 2025, 09:32 AM
Rosbone: To be fair, it was a thank you to early fans right? They said it was not free for long and it would become a pay DLC at some point.
27 Mar 2025, 09:30 AM
27 Mar 2025, 09:30 AM
Livestreams
 |
|
|
96 | ||
 |
|
|
57 | ||
 |
|
|
29 | ||
 |
|
|
21 | ||
|
|
|
|
21 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
133 | ||
 |
|
|
56 | ||
 |
|
|
16 | ||
 |
|
|
15 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.59682.879+10
- 2.43163.872+9
- 3.14839.791+7
- 4.13745.753-1
- 5.288162.640+6
- 6.18151.780+4
- 7.313114.733+9
- 8.389260.599+3
- 9.14265.686+10
- 10.18678.705+1
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
14
Download
1370
Board Info
1 post in the last 24h
6 posts in the last week
40 posts in the last month
6 posts in the last week
40 posts in the last month
Registered members: 53813
Welcome our newest member, 58winclinic
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, 58winclinic
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM