put the defensive doctrine commander out of his misery

New topic

New Reply

Posts: 134

Can we please take this poor decrepit soul out back and shoot him? Last patch saw his dhska moved back removing the ability to actually beat the axis to s choke with an mg and his AI mines moved so far back in CPS as to be useless (let's give him AI mines that can't DMG vehicles after vehicles are out ...A+). Now this patch comes along and further needs 3/5s of his abilities by moving them back farther than if he just built t2 in the first place.

I propose we remove this commander (which is sad because i actually enjoyed it on some maps) and replace it with something that's not a complete farce. Something that's use full and may have more than 2 people even equipping it.

I propose something like this:
- dshkas
- mg bunkers (maybe a special engineer callin that can build these, along with sandbags, tank traps, etc at very fast build rates but doesn't have shit for weapons)
- 45 mm AT guns
- some form of call in arty (or a howitzer)
- isu 152

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

Actually ML-20 insterad of heavy mortar could be enough, but its unlikely relic will make such 'drastic' change.

25 Nov 2015, 11:09 AM$nuffy

Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.

Good Stuff here

Multi Quote

Posts: 157

They should move the MG's and the 120 mortar back to 1 cp imo, I don't think anyone had a problem with those.

That alone would make this one viable again.

Posts: 1439

MG yes, 120mm Mortar - no.

Posts: 344

Aye. But hey, any chance of beating support weapon spam as the Soviets, by using your own support weapons, almost has something remotely to do with symmetrical faction balance! Nurf!

Pocketsize: "I can't wait till they add british to CoH: O; the extreme forces leveled by the new imbalances will create a black hole around the servers that destroys half of Canada."

Multi Quote

Posts: 134

20 Feb 2014, 00:55 AMVolsky

Aye. But hey, any chance of beating support weapon spam as the Soviets, by using your own support weapons, almost has something remotely to do with symmetrical faction balance! Nurf!

At 360mp for a dshka and 400(?) For a 120mm there waa no spamming

Honestly don't know why they messed with them at all

Posts: 2561

You mean something like this?

Posts: 134

What's the first ability?

Posts: 4928

"Machinegun Nest"

Posts: 1734

Permanently Banned

machinegun nest

Posts: 134

Ahh cool! Looks pretty good to me then

Posts: 1003

Only dream.

Posts: 1637

Take it out and bury it next to Urban Defense.

5 Mar 2015, 21:57 PMREforever

The PTRS's are fine as they are. Whenever i'm up against Guard Infantry, I always have to be careful with my vehicles or the Guards will completely destroy them. Good range, good damage and fairly cheap; if anything, the PTRS should nerfed since it's ridiculously good for the price. Even in the hands of Conscripts, the PTRS's are extremely potent.

Multi Quote