put the defensive doctrine commander out of his misery
Posts: 134
I propose we remove this commander (which is sad because i actually enjoyed it on some maps) and replace it with something that's not a complete farce. Something that's use full and may have more than 2 people even equipping it.
I propose something like this:
- dshkas
- mg bunkers (maybe a special engineer callin that can build these, along with sandbags, tank traps, etc at very fast build rates but doesn't have shit for weapons)
- 45 mm AT guns
- some form of call in arty (or a howitzer)
- isu 152
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Posts: 157
That alone would make this one viable again.
Posts: 1439
Posts: 344
Posts: 134
Aye. But hey, any chance of beating support weapon spam as the Soviets, by using your own support weapons, almost has something remotely to do with symmetrical faction balance! Nurf!
At 360mp for a dshka and 400(?) For a 120mm there waa no spamming
Honestly don't know why they messed with them at all
Posts: 2561
Posts: 134
Posts: 4928
Posts: 1734
Permanently BannedPosts: 134
Posts: 1003
Posts: 1637
Livestreams
57 | |||||
30 | |||||
24 | |||||
10 | |||||
5 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1101614.642+2
- 5.305114.728+1
- 6.916405.693-2
- 7.271108.715+22
- 8.721440.621+3
- 9.1041674.607-2
- 10.17146.788+1
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
Rosbone
8 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, 23winlocker
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM