Login

russian armor

7CP 2x T34/85 and 9CP 1x T34/85

17 Feb 2014, 20:44 PM
#1
avatar of VBMeireles

Posts: 3

I failed to understand the logic. :P

Why do 2 (two) T-34/85, for 680 manpower, 240 fuel and 24 population, unlock at 7 (seven) command points (with Guard Motor Coordination Tactics) while only 1 (one) T-34/85, for 360 manpower, 130 fuel and 12 population, requires 9 (nine) command points to unlock (with the new Advanced Warfare Tactics)?

Wouldn't it make more sense for the single T-34/85 from Advanced Warfare Tactics to require less command points to unlock than a pair of T-34/85?
17 Feb 2014, 20:45 PM
#2
avatar of nigo
Senior Editor Badge

Posts: 2238 | Subs: 15

dont worry.

they will change the 7CP dual T34/85 to 9CP in the next patch (tomorrow).
Neo
17 Feb 2014, 20:48 PM
#3
avatar of Neo

Posts: 471

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Feb 2014, 20:45 PMnigo
dont worry.

they will change the 7CP dual T34/85 to 9CP in the next patch (tomorrow).


Yeah, I actually think it should be the other way around. You should be able to call 1 tank in a bit earlier (7 or 8CP).
17 Feb 2014, 21:47 PM
#5
avatar of wooof

Posts: 950 | Subs: 1

why would you ever want the double call in if the single comes out sooner? the single call in is already more flexible since you dont need to float/invest as much. the single call in needs to have a disadvantage other than the slight difference in cost.
17 Feb 2014, 22:28 PM
#6
avatar of NorthWestFresh

Posts: 317

No the way it is now is the way it should be and makes much more sense if you keep game mechanics and true balance in mind.
17 Feb 2014, 22:42 PM
#7
avatar of Omega_Warrior

Posts: 2561

It's possible that they changed all the T34/85 and plane call-ins. Maybe they will change all the commanders in the patch.
17 Feb 2014, 23:46 PM
#8
avatar of Greeb

Posts: 971

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Feb 2014, 21:47 PMwooof
why would you ever want the double call in if the single comes out sooner? the single call in is already more flexible since you dont need to float/invest as much. the single call in needs to have a disadvantage other than the slight difference in cost.


That.
I find it coherent that the single call in requires more CP.

And we still need to see how double T34/85 gets changed in the incoming patch. Probably it would be increased to 9 CP too.
Neo
17 Feb 2014, 23:50 PM
#9
avatar of Neo

Posts: 471

Played it some, seems good (very good) as it is.
17 Feb 2014, 23:51 PM
#10
avatar of Stoffa

Posts: 333

Can't believe Relic releases a Commander that has the patched abilities (Sturmovik and T34-85) already in a non-patched environment. Do they have to be this sloppy all the time?
17 Feb 2014, 23:59 PM
#11
avatar of Omega_Warrior

Posts: 2561

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Feb 2014, 23:51 PMStoffa
Can't believe Relic releases a Commander that has the patched abilities (Sturmovik and T34-85) already in a non-patched environment. Do they have to be this sloppy all the time?
What's the difference. It's only one day.
18 Feb 2014, 00:03 AM
#12
avatar of The_rEd_bEar

Posts: 760

Is there a list as to what the new commander abilities are?
Edit- excuse my ignorance I see it
18 Feb 2014, 00:03 AM
#13
avatar of Stoffa

Posts: 333

What's the difference. It's only one day.


Yeah, I guess that's how Relic felt as well :/
Neo
18 Feb 2014, 00:06 AM
#14
avatar of Neo

Posts: 471

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Feb 2014, 23:51 PMStoffa
Can't believe Relic releases a Commander that has the patched abilities (Sturmovik and T34-85) already in a non-patched environment. Do they have to be this sloppy all the time?


Stop being toxic!
18 Feb 2014, 00:11 AM
#15
avatar of ferrozoica

Posts: 208

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Feb 2014, 00:03 AMStoffa


Yeah, I guess that's how Relic felt as well :/



To save even some minor irritation they could indeed have just waited one sodding day
18 Feb 2014, 00:13 AM
#16
avatar of Stoffa

Posts: 333

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Feb 2014, 00:06 AMNeo


Stop being toxic!


No. And I also find it sloppy that the description says "T34-85 Tanks" (Plural) when you in fact get only one. Also I take it on the site they mentioned this commander to have Gaurds, but ingame it actually doesn't.

If I was this inconsistent in my dayjob I wouldn't last long tbh.
18 Feb 2014, 00:35 AM
#17
avatar of Strummingbird
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 952 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Feb 2014, 00:13 AMStoffa


No. And I also find it sloppy that the description says "T34-85 Tanks" (Plural) when you in fact get only one. Also I take it on the site they mentioned this commander to have Gaurds, but ingame it actually doesn't.

If I was this inconsistent in my dayjob I wouldn't last long tbh.


From the steam page- "A T-34/85, with a powerful 85mm gun, can be requisitioned for the battlefield."

Also no mention of Guards anywhere, unless Steam screwed up or I'm looking at a different page :huh:
18 Feb 2014, 00:38 AM
#18
avatar of CookiezNcreem
Senior Strategist Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15

Speaking of airstrikes...
the tactical airstrikes that we have now are coo.
18 Feb 2014, 00:50 AM
#19
avatar of Stoffa

Posts: 333



From the steam page- "A T-34/85, with a powerful 85mm gun, can be requisitioned for the battlefield."



Ingame (not on the steam page) its plural. On the Steampage it mentioned Guards earlier. Guess from what youre telling me they updated that now.

18 Feb 2014, 00:54 AM
#20
avatar of Strummingbird
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 952 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Feb 2014, 00:50 AMStoffa


Ingame (not on the steam page) its plural. On the Steampage it mentioned Guards earlier. Guess from what youre telling me they updated that now.



Ah, alright that makes sense now- I haven't had the chance to try the new commanders out in-game yet.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

529 users are online: 529 guests
0 post in the last 24h
2 posts in the last week
28 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49389
Welcome our newest member, Haruta446
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM