Login

russian armor

7CP 2x T34/85 and 9CP 1x T34/85

Neo
19 Feb 2014, 08:42 AM
#81
avatar of Neo

Posts: 471

jump backJump back to quoted post19 Feb 2014, 02:06 AMWiFiDi
i think ram should be removed from the t3485 it seems to go agianst everything the unit is suppose to be.


Yeah, let's remove guns from Soviet tanks as well. It seems to go against everything Soviet tanks are supposed to be....

For once, we get a patch that nerfs what it should nerf and buffs what it should buff (with 1-2 exceptions) and people are already calling for needless nerfs. This is exactly the kind of approach that keeps the game out of balance.
19 Feb 2014, 15:32 PM
#82
avatar of Jaigen

Posts: 1130

jump backJump back to quoted post19 Feb 2014, 08:42 AMNeo


Yeah, let's remove guns from Soviet tanks as well. It seems to go against everything Soviet tanks are supposed to be....

For once, we get a patch that nerfs what it should nerf and buffs what it should buff (with 1-2 exceptions) and people are already calling for needless nerfs. This is exactly the kind of approach that keeps the game out of balance.


To be honest ram on both the regular and t-34/85 is just plain stupid and allows a medium generalist tank to be a serious threat tot heavy tank destroyers. this ability should only stun both crews for 10 seconds.
19 Feb 2014, 15:40 PM
#83
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post19 Feb 2014, 15:32 PMJaigen


To be honest ram on both the regular and t-34/85 is just plain stupid and allows a medium generalist tank to be a serious threat tot heavy tank destroyers. this ability should only stun both crews for 10 seconds.

Just like blitz P4 vs ISU/SU-85?
19 Feb 2014, 15:46 PM
#84
avatar of Aradan

Posts: 1003

jump backJump back to quoted post19 Feb 2014, 15:40 PMKatitof

Just like blitz P4 vs ISU/SU-85?


He never play Sobiets, but 100% stun for 10 sec for both is to great. :D
19 Feb 2014, 16:02 PM
#85
avatar of Volsky

Posts: 344

Even playing on custom bridge maps and spamming snipers to rake in maximum CPs, I could have teched to T-34/76s with 2-5 extra minutes waiting for the CPs needed to call in a single T-34/85. I won't call it a bad unit; I'd take it over the /76 in a heartbeat. But I think it comes too late when you consider the other 9 CP tanks available.
19 Feb 2014, 16:18 PM
#86
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

Single 85 should stay at 9CP but i think the double ones were "fine" at the old CP system, 8CP.

19 Feb 2014, 22:39 PM
#87
avatar of Omega_Warrior

Posts: 2561

Single 85 should stay at 9CP but i think the double ones were "fine" at the old CP system, 8CP.


Yeah the single call-ins and the double in my mind are 2 very different call-ins. The single one is an add-on to whatever building you built as it can come out at a with minimal waiting to support other units. The double call-in takes far too long to wait for and isn't as effective as heavy tanks. It should be used to replace a second level building, trading variety for a decent medium tank and should at very least be 8cp.

So unless they plan to change all the T34/85 call-ins to single, the double one needs to go back down. The KV-1 too.
19 Feb 2014, 23:19 PM
#88
avatar of WiFiDi
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 3293

jump backJump back to quoted post19 Feb 2014, 08:42 AMNeo


Yeah, let's remove guns from Soviet tanks as well. It seems to go against everything Soviet tanks are supposed to be....

For once, we get a patch that nerfs what it should nerf and buffs what it should buff (with 1-2 exceptions) and people are already calling for needless nerfs. This is exactly the kind of approach that keeps the game out of balance.


i guess i didnt' imply hard enough that they should be replaced with another ability not based around suicide. :D
Neo
19 Feb 2014, 23:30 PM
#89
avatar of Neo

Posts: 471

jump backJump back to quoted post19 Feb 2014, 23:19 PMWiFiDi


i guess i didnt' imply hard enough that they should be replaced with another ability not based around suicide. :D


You didn't hehe :) Like what?
19 Feb 2014, 23:31 PM
#90
avatar of Speculator

Posts: 157

I'd kill for a blitzkrieg like ability, especially as a flanker. Then this might actually be valid:

which can now match this:

It'll be like childhood, watching a bunch of micro machines zoom about.
20 Feb 2014, 00:56 AM
#91
avatar of WiFiDi
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 3293

jump backJump back to quoted post19 Feb 2014, 23:30 PMNeo


You didn't hehe :) Like what?


thats why i didn't mention it i don't know :)
0 user is browsing this thread:

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

543 users are online: 543 guests
1 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49062
Welcome our newest member, Mclatc16
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM