Login

russian armor

SNF / Halftrack

27 Jan 2014, 07:55 AM
#21
avatar of Sorban

Posts: 36

Maybe in the SNF final the mg's was the bigger problem, not the fht. Or the combo of both.
27 Jan 2014, 08:26 AM
#22
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

One thing that is being worth mentioning-it was also said that if FHT and quad were to loose reinforce, then at least in 251 case default weapons would be buffed.
27 Jan 2014, 09:00 AM
#23
avatar of link0

Posts: 337

27 Jan 2014, 09:03 AM
#24
avatar of DerBaer

Posts: 219

Halftracks are fine. One AT gun, or guards and the HT/ FHT is history. There are really more important things to look at...
27 Jan 2014, 10:08 AM
#25
avatar of GustavGans

Posts: 747

jump backJump back to quoted post27 Jan 2014, 09:03 AMDerBaer
Halftracks are fine. One AT gun, or guards and the HT/ FHT is history. There are really more important things to look at...


+1
27 Jan 2014, 11:10 AM
#26
avatar of Turtle

Posts: 401

Making the upgraded versions of the 251 discreet units form the basic forms allows them to do things like make the base HT a bit better, to make people want to use them more, then there would be less expectation for the flame HT to inherit all those benefits.

Same goes for the M5
27 Jan 2014, 11:39 AM
#27
avatar of Unshavenbackman

Posts: 680

jump backJump back to quoted post27 Jan 2014, 07:55 AMSorban
Maybe in the SNF final the mg's was the bigger problem, not the fht. Or the combo of both.


Or the reluctancy to get a zisgun or mortar. Bad play shouldnt be a an example for changing the game.
27 Jan 2014, 12:10 PM
#28
avatar of Greeb

Posts: 971

What about increasing reinforcing cost in HTs?
27 Jan 2014, 12:22 PM
#29
avatar of Aradan

Posts: 1003

Halftrack and scout cars need some camuflage in wehicle green cover.
27 Jan 2014, 12:57 PM
#30
avatar of rafiki

Posts: 108

you all say that FHT is fine. But yesterday 5-0 for german because mainly of it. Of course it is because it was very good players playing it. But 5-0 !!!

guards is not a counter in 1vs1. You need shock to figth against PG. Remain Ziz, T70 and T34. But they can fail as seen yesterday

So perhaps FHT is fine. But don't say it to OMGPOP :P
27 Jan 2014, 13:21 PM
#31
avatar of dasheepeh

Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post27 Jan 2014, 12:10 PMGreeb
What about increasing reinforcing cost in HTs?
27 Jan 2014, 13:21 PM
#32
avatar of Paranoia

Posts: 93

jump backJump back to quoted post27 Jan 2014, 12:10 PMGreeb
What about increasing reinforcing cost in HTs?

^^^
Best suggestion yet!!
27 Jan 2014, 15:25 PM
#33
avatar of Rizza
Donator 22

Posts: 101

The halftrack should still be allowed to reinforce with the flamers but I think the muni cost of upgrading to the flamers should reduce to 60 muni along with a nerf to the flame damage.

27 Jan 2014, 15:37 PM
#34
avatar of Z3r07
Donator 11

Posts: 1006

jump backJump back to quoted post27 Jan 2014, 12:10 PMGreeb
What about increasing reinforcing cost in HTs?



^^^
Best suggestion yet!!


I agree, very smart
27 Jan 2014, 16:17 PM
#35
avatar of Durendal

Posts: 58

FHT is one of the only viable early game counters to shocks, moving the flame upgrade to t3 will probably cause more problems than it will resolve, you can quote the 5-0 german victory on yesterdays SNF but what of the cumulative stats for the whole tourney? Its pretty easy to take a subset of a sample and try to make an argument without providing proper context =/ Im by no means an expert so take my opinions with a grain of salt if you want but I think energy could be better invested dealing with other issues
27 Jan 2014, 16:26 PM
#36
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

And who said anything about moving FHT upgrade to T3?

All that was said by PQ was that taking away reinforce after upgrade and buffing default weapons could be an option.
27 Jan 2014, 16:26 PM
#37
avatar of Porygon

Posts: 2779

Yeah, yeah

nerf the already nerfed HT so more shocks can roflroll the game
27 Jan 2014, 16:28 PM
#38
avatar of VonIvan

Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21

Honestly the Soviet wins in the beginning to mid SNF were due to the large buffs given to them, ever since they introduced an accuracy penalty on tanks the Ostheer don't have to worry about their paks/shreck squads getting wiped so quickly, as well as the changes given to the ppsh and the suppression buff added to the mg42 has now allowed the Ostheer to worry less in the early game. Some would argue 1 CP shocks could easily solve this problem and are a problem in itself, but because most Ostheer players that I have encountered now happily embrace using the fht as a counter it's much harder for the Soviets to get a hold on things early-to mid game I find in 1v1.
27 Jan 2014, 16:29 PM
#39
avatar of rafiki

Posts: 108

Indeed. It have to be study more generaly.

And in SNF they failed to counter it but, they were close to do it and who know what would had happened if they success. Soviet were in a good position before it
27 Jan 2014, 16:30 PM
#40
avatar of Durendal

Posts: 58

jump backJump back to quoted post27 Jan 2014, 16:26 PMKatitof
And who said anything about moving FHT upgrade to T3?

All that was said by PQ was that taking away reinforce after upgrade and buffing default weapons could be an option.


Several people in this thread suggested it, that's what I was referring to I could have been more clear my apologies.

2 users are browsing this thread: 2 guests

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

879 users are online: 2 members and 877 guests
188bet88design, LCarlos
0 post in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49145
Welcome our newest member, 188bet88design
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM