Posts: 45
Posts: 61
Posts: 231
Posts: 91
Posts: 1571
Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13
Posts: 194
Posts: 317
Posts: 1637
The PTRS's are fine as they are. Whenever i'm up against Guard Infantry, I always have to be careful with my vehicles or the Guards will completely destroy them. Good range, good damage and fairly cheap; if anything, the PTRS should nerfed since it's ridiculously good for the price. Even in the hands of Conscripts, the PTRS's are extremely potent.
Posts: 952 | Subs: 1
STUG is better than the P4 in frontal armor and Pen. If i dont go T4 ill go STUG with Pgrens dor AI if its a Guards doctrine.
Posts: 531
Posts: 40
Stug is awsome if used right. An su 85 will beat a stug but not by much. Stug is also a very decent infanty killer and once you get vet on it you get the target weak point which will freeze an enemy tank. The Unit is very good but also hard to manage, you just need to practice using it effectively and once you start getting good at that you will find its actually a very nice unit.
Posts: 1130
This. If your opponent is just pumping out T34s; a supported Stug will eat them up.
Posts: 208
Posts: 208
One of the things that's made me use less stugs is because of the target weak point bug(I think it's still there) where it targets the ground instead of the vehicle
Posts: 747
Posts: 3293
Failure is always an option. 
It's a happy massacre?! (yes, yes it is!)
Caffeine illegal for WiFi's to ingest in 48 states, 2 colonies, and 1 providences. 
To make most awesome thing in universe combine Bears and Nicholas Cage! 
and remember kids, we didn't start the flame-war!
Posts: 1
Posts: 208
The StuG has the same frontal armor as the P-4.
Posts: 419
 |
|
|
114 | ||
|
|
|
|
19 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
8 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
