Login

russian armor

BasedSecretary is right.

14 Jul 2022, 06:28 AM
#1
avatar of donofsandiego

Posts: 1379

I'm pretty sick and tired of BIG TANK GAMING!!!1 (tm)

Can we have funny light tanks and tankettes? Sometimes you have to step into uncharted territory and make some decisions you might not think will work out perfectly. And in return make some concessions to please the other crowd.

Look at Battlefield 1; at a time where everyone and their mother was out with the whole SPACE WARFARE setting, Battlefield 1 took it all the way back to fucking World War 1. Now, did they make it Verdun-level WW1 gameplay? Fuck no they didn't. They still had smgs and automatic weapons, but it was a bit limited and very clearly fit the setting. They stuck their neck out a little, but still tried to keep the game fun.


Why can't Relic just fucking trust their playerbase enough to try something a little new? Why do they want to just take CoH2 gameplay with a CoH1 coat of paint and slap "CoH3" onto it?

What a joke.
14 Jul 2022, 07:12 AM
#2
avatar of DonnieChan

Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1

as soon as you do that, you get every normie asking: and where is the big tank!?!??!
14 Jul 2022, 07:43 AM
#3
avatar of GiaA

Posts: 713 | Subs: 2




Why do they want to just take CoH2 gameplay with a CoH1 coat of paint and slap "CoH3" onto it?

What a joke.


Thank you for this incredibly deep analysis. Although, I did read a guy on reddit say that it's CoH1 in CoH2 skin so now I don't know which arbitrary bs statement to believe.
14 Jul 2022, 17:28 PM
#4
avatar of donofsandiego

Posts: 1379

as soon as you do that, you get every normie asking: and where is the big tank!?!??!


Then they can go play CoH2 if they love them so friggin much. And also, that's why I said that the devs have to stick their neck out a little. BUT also throw a bone to the other ppl. They could easily focus on the light tanks, but only include heavies and sturdy mediums as absolute unicorns/ special units.
14 Jul 2022, 17:28 PM
#5
avatar of donofsandiego

Posts: 1379

jump backJump back to quoted post14 Jul 2022, 07:43 AMGiaA


Thank you for this incredibly deep analysis. Although, I did read a guy on reddit say that it's CoH1 in CoH2 skin so now I don't know which arbitrary bs statement to believe.


Use your brain, and then after that you can come back and tell me what you thought.
14 Jul 2022, 18:07 PM
#6
avatar of Protos Angelus

Posts: 1515

I like big tank plays. It's nice that you have three tiers of heaviness.

You have light tanks which are early game and transition into late game as utility vehicles.
Medium tanks which are mid game and transition into late game as just all-rounders you can spam.
Yo mama tanks which are exceptional in every way.

Makes the game more fun, especially in larger modes.

So... just because you don't like it doesn't mean anything. It hasn't got some deep profound meaning just because it's not mainstream.
14 Jul 2022, 20:28 PM
#7
avatar of KoRneY

Posts: 682



Use your brain, and then after that you can come back and tell me what you thought.


I think your idea blows
14 Jul 2022, 21:24 PM
#8
avatar of afrrs

Posts: 3787

basedfuckedupsecretary is full of shit

he is threathening people and makes assumptions about people he never met .
14 Jul 2022, 22:38 PM
#9
avatar of Willy Pete

Posts: 348

Lol not so great timing on that title
15 Jul 2022, 06:49 AM
#10
avatar of spectre645

Posts: 90

having no heavies in a coh game is like removing grenades from halo. people will nonstop ask for it. Look at how much people begged for Pershing when usf launched for coh2
15 Jul 2022, 07:01 AM
#11
avatar of Crecer13

Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2

having no heavies in a coh game is like removing grenades from halo. people will nonstop ask for it. Look at how much people begged for Pershing when usf launched for coh2


And how much Pershing do you see in the game? I have not seen Pershing for several years :)
15 Jul 2022, 07:20 AM
#12
avatar of Protos Angelus

Posts: 1515



And how much Pershing do you see in the game? I have not seen Pershing for several years :)


You can thank the balance team for that mostly. I also don't see KV2, IS2, KV1 (after the dmg reduction nerf). Mostly because they just don't fit and are pointless to play. But you do see IS152, elefants, jagds, tigers and king tigers on a regular basis (>1 in each 3v3 game). Wonder why?
15 Jul 2022, 07:59 AM
#13
avatar of Crecer13

Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2



You can thank the balance team for that mostly. I also don't see KV2, IS2, KV1 (after the dmg reduction nerf). Mostly because they just don't fit and are pointless to play. But you do see IS152, elefants, jagds, tigers and king tigers on a regular basis (>1 in each 3v3 game). Wonder why?


With the current design in heavy tanks, it doesn't make much sense. He was at the start of the game when there were no heavy tank limits and 3 vs 3 and 4 vs 4 matches ended in a huge heavy tank battle. Now, in general, a heavy tank (perhaps except for the Churchill) is a waste of resources and it is more profitable to use a tank destroyer. I myself recently played matches only with the IS-2 and once again made sure that this is a meaningless tank.
16 Jul 2022, 06:20 AM
#14
avatar of donofsandiego

Posts: 1379

having no heavies in a coh game is like removing grenades from halo. people will nonstop ask for it. Look at how much people begged for Pershing when usf launched for coh2


Like I said, concessions can be made to keep everyone happy, but this is too derivative. Too many BEEK TANKS. Like I said, Relic doesn't trust their fanbase enough to do something new. Sad.
16 Jul 2022, 06:21 AM
#15
avatar of donofsandiego

Posts: 1379

Lol not so great timing on that title


It was intentional :banned:
16 Jul 2022, 09:20 AM
#16
avatar of Kurobane

Posts: 658




Why can't Relic just fucking trust their playerbase enough to try something a little new? Why do they want to just take CoH2 gameplay with a CoH1 coat of paint and slap "CoH3" onto it?

What a joke.


That would require them to actually do some work. Relic is basically like Activision Blizzard in numerous ways.

They are :

- Out of Touch with their player base (Dawn of War 3)
- Reuse the same engine over and over in every game like Call of Duty. They apply a colorful filter to COH3 and they can pretend like they actually did some work while also blinding us with the extreme color brightness (so much so that some dessert maps look like Mars) This allows them to reuse most of their assets. Relic is all about doing the bare minimum and least work possible (just look at how they have missing, misleading or lack of information in tooltips)
-Took them 20+ years to finally add the ability to change hotkeys which has been requested and cried about all the way back in the 90's.

16 Jul 2022, 10:54 AM
#17
avatar of Lady Xenarra

Posts: 956



And how much Pershing do you see in the game? I have not seen Pershing for several years :)

Well....I put 3 KT HEAT shells into one a couple days ago. One shell bounced :rofl:

Oh believe me, ppl will clamour for the USF heavy again, even if they later hate it. Please no M6 heavy Relic, that would be bad.
16 Jul 2022, 11:01 AM
#18
avatar of Crecer13

Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2


Well....I put 3 KT HEAT shells into one a couple days ago. One shell bounced :rofl:

Oh believe me, ppl will clamour for the USF heavy again, even if they later hate it. Please no M6 heavy Relic, that would be bad.


Too late, the Black Prince is already here. Its opened the door for all sorts of nonsense: - wait a minute, Britain got the Black Prince, why not give the US a T1/M6 heavy tank?
16 Jul 2022, 11:09 AM
#19
avatar of Lady Xenarra

Posts: 956



Too late, the Black Prince is already here. Its opened the door for all sorts of nonsense: - wait a minute, Britain got the Black Prince, why not give the US a T1/M6 heavy tank?

Because it's a very very heavy slow brick that'll get stomped by a Tiger? It's got a 75mm gun so you can't move it to lower tiers like say...a British Matilda (40mm gun) could have been. So late game tech placement where it has to face...a Tiger.

Or maybe Tiger is the problem after Black Prince? o_O
16 Jul 2022, 11:13 AM
#20
avatar of Crecer13

Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2


Because it's a very very heavy slow brick that'll get stomped by a Tiger?


Ah, and there's another argument here: reality ≠ balance and the game might be viable. And in general, Britain in the game has a prototype from 1945 in Africa 1942-1943. We also want a cool wunderwaffe for our faction. Give it to us now!

the M6 had the M7 cannon, which was installed on the M10 destroyer tank, and in terms of armor penetration it was quite a good cannon comparable to the penetration of the 88 Tiger cannon. But in general, it was a terrible tank and therefore it did not get to the front, although 40 tanks were produced.
0 user is browsing this thread:

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

467 users are online: 467 guests
0 post in the last 24h
2 posts in the last week
28 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49388
Welcome our newest member, KETTA
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM