They certainly hide from me.
Also, there is some hope, given how panther is NOT a stock tank first time EVER in CoH history.
FUCKING KEK
Posts: 1660
They certainly hide from me.
Also, there is some hope, given how panther is NOT a stock tank first time EVER in CoH history.
Posts: 1594
They certainly hide from me.
Posts: 1660
Heh. Nothin personnel... Kraut...
Posts: 8
I'm all for a diverse array of vehicles and weapons to be added to the game.
That being said, they all ought to have a specific role or, at least, a specific timing with which they are strong and useful. A panzer III could easily be a slightly worse p4 and force a player to choose between a weaker tank now or a stronger tank later.
I'm also of the opinion that coh3 could be some kind of "ultimate" coh experience; a separate tuning pack and direct port of old factions could be worthwhile in certain cases (Panzer Elite, Soviets, OKW?) I'd also like to see some early war stuff. I'd love to see one or more factions that uses Dutch, Belgian, French, and British equipment/soldiers. You solve the tank technology issue by having different periods of action where the late war german faction cannot (at least in automatch) compete with the early war French faction.
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
Posts: 4928
Not to mention there are references in gamefiles from P3, to be more specific its MGs.
Posts: 28
They certainly hide from me.
Also, there is some hope, given how panther is NOT a stock tank first time EVER in CoH history.
Posts: 978
It's in every WW2 games community. Some people can't stand that Germans get better tanks.
Well, considering CoH1 & 2 played late in the war, using Panther as a stock tank was not inacurate. From Wikipedia:
Total production numbers:
P4: ~8500
P5: ~6000
in 1944:
P4: ~3100
P5: ~3800
So I don't get where the hate from having Panthers together with P4s as stock tanks comes from.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
It's in every WW2 games community. Some people can't stand that Germans get better tanks.
Posts: 1820 | Subs: 2
Posts: 978
I shared that opinion. Then they introduced the Black Prince. Now I want the big German heavies since the game would tilt into the wrong direction otherwise. This is EXACTLY the power creep people warned about in the BP thread. As a matter of fact that is the reason why the BP destroys the game. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Sadly, developers love to share-in on that hitlers megalomania and obsession with panthers, tigers and KTs, so whole community has to pretend that WW2 didn't started before 1942.
Are you not fed up of getting the exact same thing, game to game, when there is a whole fucking LOT of interesting and unused generally in games armor?
Have you played MoW series? Steel Division? It is possible to make an interesting WW2 RTS without shoehorning muh wunderwaffe krupp stahl.
Posts: 518
It is possible to make an interesting WW2 RTS without shoehorning muh wunderwaffe krupp stahl.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
I'm not specifically for BP, I'm for new units that we have not seen in the series yet or were not popularized by hollywood.
Again, there is a whole shitload of interesting hardware we've never seen, large caliber ATGs on halftrucks are one of these things and I love them already, more could be added if we ignored some of the late war stuff for once.
Tell me you wouldn't like to see M3 Lee for example. We're supposedly getting African campaign parts as well, so where are Lees? Why everything always needs to be Cromwells, P4s and Shermans etc?
Posts: 518
again, 90% are only interested in late war stuff.
If you implement other things they like "wtf this isnt ww2"
Posts: 518
I'm not specifically for BP, I'm for new units that we have not seen in the series yet or were not popularized by hollywood. [...] more could be added if we ignored some of the late war stuff for once.
Tell me you wouldn't like to see M3 Lee for example. We're supposedly getting African campaign parts as well, so where are Lees? Why everything always needs to be Cromwells, P4s and Shermans etc?
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
Source? Didn't the majority vote for Africa / Italy in a poll some years ago, meaning that most people don't necessarily want late war stuff
Posts: 28
Sadly, developers love to share-in on that hitlers megalomania and obsession with panthers, tigers and KTs, so whole community has to pretend that WW2 didn't started before 1942.
Are you not fed up of getting the exact same thing, game to game, when there is a whole fucking LOT of interesting and unused generally in games armor?
Have you played MoW series? Steel Division? It is possible to make an interesting WW2 RTS without shoehorning muh wunderwaffe krupp stahl.
Posts: 570 | Subs: 1
So keep stuff from 1943 out of the game because we already saw it but keep prototypes from 1945 in it because we never saw them?
There is lots of late war stuff that the germans had (albeit often only in protoype from) that never was in CoH either. So you would be ok with that (or stuff like Nashorn replacing Stug) too?
The thing is, like Cardboard Tank said, there will be a PowerCreep. Having pre 1943 tanks fight BP (and the Archer in its currenty form) isn't going to work well
I myself would like to see M3 and others would like so too. But it would probably not work with Panther in Stock or Kinger Tiger avaible.
Same goes for Panzer III.
Keep the BP / Tiger II out of the game and then Panzer IIIs, M3 Lees and putting Panther behind a doc. choice would make sense
Posts: 240
*snip*
45 | |||||
18 | |||||
47 | |||||
27 | |||||
6 | |||||
6 | |||||
4 | |||||
2 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |