Login

russian armor

120 mortar Vet 1 ability

6 Jul 2021, 09:42 AM
#21
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1


correct me if im wrong bro and be serious and honest u only say that it should not be sticky becuz u wont use this unit vs people. u wont play this command or that army. u might but never as much as your favorite axis. u love axis so much u will defend every thread that pushes anything good for allies. nd if its against axis u try to say it needs buffs... cmon now bro

Pls stick in debating the point.

If you have an argument why a mortar should be able to also perform as AT weapon feel free to explain your point of view.
MMX
6 Jul 2021, 10:29 AM
#22
avatar of MMX

Posts: 999 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post6 Jul 2021, 09:42 AMVipper

If you have an argument why a mortar should be able to also perform as AT weapon feel free to explain your point of view.


you certainly have a point in that 1k penetration and 136 (or 160?) damage per hit look quite powerful for a mortar, at least on paper. still, eating more than one shell should be an absolute rarity given the huge scatter and low rate of fire of the 120mm. i also don't see why the 'sticky' part of the projectile out of all things would cause so much headache. after all it does virtually nothing in terms of chance to hit or damage dealt (unless, of course, you'd change the projectile collision so that it either phases through the tank and sticks to the ground beneath it or somehow bounces off to the side instead). if the AT capability is your major concern, i'd say reducing penetration and/or damage dealt would be the more logical approach.
6 Jul 2021, 11:18 AM
#23
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post6 Jul 2021, 10:29 AMMMX


you certainly have a point in that 1k penetration and 136 (or 160?) damage per hit look quite powerful for a mortar, at least on paper. still, eating more than one shell should be an absolute rarity given the huge scatter and low rate of fire of the 120mm. i also don't see why the 'sticky' part of the projectile out of all things would cause so much headache. after all it does virtually nothing in terms of chance to hit or damage dealt (unless, of course, you'd change the projectile collision so that it either phases through the tank and sticks to the ground beneath it or somehow bounces off to the side instead). if the AT capability is your major concern, i'd say reducing penetration and/or damage dealt would be the more logical approach.

Because it makes little sense that infatry and support weapon have a counter play and can move out of blast area and vehicles do not.

It also make little sense, is non realistic and I really do not see any justification.

As for multiple round hitting the same target I am not sure if they have removed the critical damage these round used to to do. If they haven't it should be plausible to hit a vehicles with multiple rounds.
MMX
6 Jul 2021, 12:40 PM
#24
avatar of MMX

Posts: 999 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post6 Jul 2021, 11:18 AMVipper

It also make little sense, is non realistic and I really do not see any justification.


well, what would be a more realistic implementation then in your opinion?

the round warping through the vehicle is hardly any more realistic.

having the shell bounce off the tank would of course be preferable, but i doubt this is even possible engine-wise.

otherwise the round could likely be made to explode on impact. more realistic for sure, but that would again not change anything with respect to chance to hit and damage dealt, just delay the inevitable.
6 Jul 2021, 12:44 PM
#25
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post6 Jul 2021, 12:40 PMMMX


well, what would be a more realistic implementation then in your opinion?


the round warping through the vehicle is hardly any more realistic.

having the shell bounce off the tank would of course be preferable, but i doubt this is even possible engine-wise.

otherwise the round could likely be made to explode on impact. more realistic for sure, but that would again not change anything with respect to chance to hit and damage dealt, just delay the inevitable.

If it behaved exactly the same regardless where it landed. Simply explode after a certain time.
MMX
6 Jul 2021, 12:54 PM
#26
avatar of MMX

Posts: 999 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post6 Jul 2021, 12:44 PMVipper

If it behaved exactly the same regardless where it landed. Simply explode after a certain time.


arguably that's what it does already. if the landing spot happens to be a tank and able to move it will just move with it until it explodes. imho still a better solution that magically phasing through the vehicle onto the ground.

anyway, i think this is a pretty insignificant issue anyway given how incredibly rare it is to hit a tank with a sticky mortar round.
6 Jul 2021, 13:03 PM
#27
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post6 Jul 2021, 12:54 PMMMX


arguably that's what it does already. if the landing spot happens to be a tank and able to move it will just move with it until it explodes. imho still a better solution that magically phasing through the vehicle onto the ground.

anyway, i think this is a pretty insignificant issue anyway given how incredibly rare it is to hit a tank with a sticky mortar round.

Actually it is not that hard to hit slow vehicles like Ele/JT even the Pak howitzer can do it using the HEAT rounds.

The round does not have to "phase" it simply need not to "collide" with vehicle and simply land on the ground.
6 Jul 2021, 14:13 PM
#28
avatar of Hannibal
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 3118 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post6 Jul 2021, 12:54 PMMMX
arguably that's what it does already. if the landing spot happens to be a tank and able to move it will just move with it until it explodes. imho still a better solution that magically phasing through the vehicle onto the ground.

anyway, i think this is a pretty insignificant issue anyway given how incredibly rare it is to hit a tank with a sticky mortar round.

How long was the fuse again? For some quicker vehicles you can still evade, especially if you've already started driving out of the danger zone and the vehicle has built up some speed. but I agree, overall these issues are very marginal.

jump backJump back to quoted post6 Jul 2021, 13:03 PMVipper

Actually it is not that hard to hit slow vehicles like Ele/JT even the Pak howitzer can do it using the HEAT rounds.

Which is exactly why it does not really matter that much for large and slow vehicles. They could rarely dodge the shell anyway. Smaller and lighter vehicles are more effected by this since also the 80 damage has a larger impact, but then again I have to agree with MMX that the overall effect of fixing this will not be large. I'd personally still rather have it phase through the vehicle and hit the ground below, but if this causes a lot of work, just leave it be. This time is better invested elsewhere.

jump backJump back to quoted post6 Jul 2021, 13:03 PMVipper

The round does not have to "phase" it simply need not to "collide" with vehicle and simply land on the ground.

Which is exactly what phasing through the vehicle means...
6 Jul 2021, 15:04 PM
#29
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1


How long was the fuse again? For some quicker vehicles you can still evade, especially if you've already started driving out of the danger zone and the vehicle has built up some speed. but I agree, overall these issues are very marginal.


Which is exactly why it does not really matter that much for large and slow vehicles. They could rarely dodge the shell anyway. Smaller and lighter vehicles are more effected by this since also the 80 damage has a larger impact, but then again I have to agree with MMX that the overall effect of fixing this will not be large. I'd personally still rather have it phase through the vehicle and hit the ground below, but if this causes a lot of work, just leave it be. This time is better invested elsewhere.


Which is exactly what phasing through the vehicle means...

First of all the round does 160.

Second there is a 3 sec timer

Third the projectile at least in my PC is not that visible.

My point was that is should land on the ground from start and not move to the ground if a vehicles moves.

One can easily hit stationary vehicles. It also seem they have removed the critical which is a good thing.
14 Jul 2021, 12:30 PM
#30
avatar of Letzte Bataillon

Posts: 195

If it really is sticky that's surely an oversight and extremely silly regardless.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
Soheil: Coh2 still broken server ?
Yesterday, 18:27 PM
Rosbone: Congrats to Relic. Looks like Coh3 has finally usurped Coh2 s the popular Coh. You smell terrific. :snfQuinn:.
Last Monday, 02:46 AM
Nickbn: and again someone else replies. I mean come on guys. Give @adamírcz a chance
Last Saturday, 14:00 PM
Willy Pete: @Nickbn you didn't ask a question, and this is a chat box...
Last Thursday, 13:11 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone it's incredibly rude to speak on someone elses behalf, especially when a question is directly adressed to them. I understand your passion for the subject at hand but I want to hear from him.
Last Thursday, 10:16 AM
Rosbone: @Nickbn No, I am just saying people should not be using any Relic owned forum since they have proven they ban anyone who says true things about Coh3.
18 Mar 2025, 19:01 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone do you speak on his behalf? I didn't know. In that case keep us updated please.
18 Mar 2025, 16:47 PM
Rosbone: #RelicModdedEchoChamber
16 Mar 2025, 17:54 PM
Rosbone: @Nickbn True except, the only people on the Relic Discord/Reddit/Steam are brain washed monkey zealots. They wont even understand what @adamírcz is talking about. Anyone else is banned.
16 Mar 2025, 17:54 PM
Nickbn: @adamírcz might be a better idea to voice this to relic directly than to voice it here, in a shoutbox of a nearly deade fansite #justsaying...
16 Mar 2025, 16:36 PM
webdesign-muenchen-w: @Rosbone it is sick
14 Mar 2025, 22:09 PM
aerafield: @adamírcz aren't the first two disconnects free every day?
14 Mar 2025, 19:26 PM
Rosbone: It is so unlike Relic to punish its fans and community.
14 Mar 2025, 12:07 PM
adamírcz: So, I just got a leaver penalty without even getting onto the loading screen because of the game disconnecting, bravo Relic
14 Mar 2025, 10:45 AM
Rosbone: It is an indicator of the very short sighted capitalist view that plagues any company where leadership does not understand the product.
13 Mar 2025, 20:00 PM
Rosbone: They dont care about Coh3 or Coh in general. They are just trying to grab cash by ripping off the small user base they have.
13 Mar 2025, 19:58 PM
Rosbone: Just making mistake after mistake after mistake.
13 Mar 2025, 19:57 PM
Rosbone: It is clear they crapped out an unfinished game. And are now barely supporting it as they make new smaller games. Coh3 is stillborn. It will be meh for at least another 2-4 years. Meaning they killed the whole franchise instead of growing it.
13 Mar 2025, 19:56 PM
Rosbone: For a thing they could fix in minutes. Literally minutes.
13 Mar 2025, 19:53 PM
Rosbone: If I did play coh3 and was mainly a skirmish player, I would be pissed and probably stop playing. And it has been like this since release. Why? I would not tell my friends to buy a game I am not even playing. Lost sales and angered users.
13 Mar 2025, 19:53 PM

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

190 users are online: 190 guests
0 post in the last 24h
12 posts in the last week
91 posts in the last month
Registered members: 52977
Welcome our newest member, Mitch515
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM