Posts: 999 | Subs: 1
More trivia, CB activates and tracks shermans and the valentine if you use the smoke ability.
And I kid you not, CB also activates when the britt base howitzers fire as well, give that base a nice dose of extremely lethal rounds.
Posts: 366
wait what, cb does activate for smoke dischargers as well? that should be quite an efficient way to fake out a counter barrage before hitting back with a salvo of your own. at least for usf and brits, that is...
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
I'm really not seeing what sort of point you're trying to make here.
Posts: 1515
I agree with their sentiment that the "CB requires no micro" argument is totally overblown. It saves you a grand total of three clicks and some map awareness while targeting whatever it wants, which might be a lone mortar squad, when a well placed regular barrage in a target rich environment would usually yield better results. And something being micro-less isn't really the best argument against it, because autofire for many units (mortars etc) is equally micro-less.
I would like to replace but, but actually because I think the ability is meh (it won't hit its intended target most of the time), not overpowered or whatever.
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
against a well organized team.
You'll see that due to the density and the overall small area,
Posts: 246
UA
soviets Posts: 103
If we're taking well organized teams into consideration, then vet 1 LeFHs do not exist. Or any static howitzers for that matter.
Posts: 282
 | Playercard of [DGM] Cain Le Roi Du Pétrole | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
If it's such a non issue for your vision of "high level" CoH2 play why are you so adamantly defending this dumb ability. It would make more sense to get rid of it if it won't affect what you're balancing the game around anyway.
Posts: 1003
isnt it the point? CB should track through fow!
It is a vet1 ability.
and you can avoid by moving your unit, it is still rng even if the first shot tracks...
Posts: 1003
And UKF have 2 non-doc howitzer then, where do we go?
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
I agree with their sentiment that the "CB requires no micro" argument is totally overblown. It saves you a grand total of three clicks and some map awareness while targeting whatever it wants, which might be a lone mortar squad, when a well placed regular barrage in a target rich environment would usually yield better results. And something being micro-less isn't really the best argument against it, because autofire for many units (mortars etc) is equally micro-less.
I would like to replace but, but actually because I think the ability is meh (it won't hit its intended target most of the time), not overpowered or whatever.
Posts: 1515
And UKF have 2 non-doc howitzer then, where do we go?
Posts: 3114 | Subs: 2
 |
|
|
30 | ||
 |
|
|
8 | ||
 |
|
|
248 | ||
 |
|
|
26 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
