flank vehicles

Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2021, 08:16 AMVipper

Here what Relic has to say from the patch notes:
"The role of the T34 is that of a flanker meant to exploit enemy weak points with hit and run tactics. "


Now pls stop fabricating thing that are false and present them as Relic's design.

Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2021, 07:02 AMVipper

Relic decided to create the role of "flanker" that is a simply fact and T-34/76 was designed with that role.

If Relic implement that role correctly is another story.

The current state of the T-34/76 is even yet another story since Relic has stop making designing the Patches a long time ago. I will not go into T-34/76 current performance since it irrelevant this topic.

The fact remain that vehicles better of maintaining distance and vehicles that are better of closing the distance.

Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2021, 10:55 AMmrgame2

yes there was a time relic designed the game as more individual units with specialist skills like many other games

but over time of requesting standardization and reducing armor/(aka rng). things have clearly change

Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2021, 10:59 AMKatitof

Not a single axis unit in game lost any relevant amount of armor that would even remotely impact result vs T34 main gun at any range, be it frontal or rear armor. Maybe some fringe cases with 5-10% bounce chance.

Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2021, 10:59 AMKatitof

Not a single axis unit in game lost any relevant amount of armor that would even remotely impact result vs T34 main gun at any range, be it frontal or rear armor. Maybe some fringe cases with 5-10% bounce chance.

Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2021, 11:41 AMVipper

REEEEEEEEEEEEE

Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2021, 11:41 AMVipper

Again totally false.

Please check you fact before posting:


Panther:
Rear Armor from 135 to 112.5

• Rear armour reduced from 110 to 90 (all variants)


Tiger
...
Rear armor from 250 to 180
...
Wehrmacht Tiger & Tiger Ace rear armored reduced from 180 to 140


Wehrmacht Elefant rear armor reduced from 150 to 110
OKW Jagdtiger rear armor reduced from 150 to 110
OKW King Tiger rear armor reduced from 225 to 150

Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2021, 11:44 AMKatitof

If you only could have made it to the end of the sentence....

Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2021, 10:59 AMKatitof

Maybe some fringe cases with 5-10% bounce chance.

Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2021, 11:44 AMKatitof

But no, its better to just ignore half of the sentence and regurgitate your usual bullshit.

Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2021, 11:55 AMVipper

You mean this:

So let me do the math for you cause you really seem to be struggling lately

T-34/76 vs rear Tiger:
from 32%->57%

that is plus +25% chance

T-34/76 vs rear K. Tiger:
from 36%->53%
that is plus +17% chance

T-34/76 vs rear Panther
from 59%->89%
that is plus +30% chance

Again pls check fact before posting

That is you projecting once more.

Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2021, 11:50 AMJohnSmith

Did you read all that was posted? Clearly not. Check your reading before posting. He included exactly what you say.

Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2021, 11:55 AMJohnSmith

You're posting stats in the best possible cases. Please post n/m/f too.

Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2021, 10:59 AMKatitof

Not a single axis unit in game lost any relevant amount of armor that would even remotely impact result vs T34 main gun at any range, be it frontal or rear armor. Maybe some fringe cases with 5-10% bounce chance.

Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2021, 04:12 AMthedarkarmadillo

The role that's being called "flanker" exists and is really just called "shitty"