Most of the t34 AI comes from the hull mg does it not? How does the KV1 hull stack up?
The gun is not that bad either but the mg are the same. KV-1 one actually has an extra one in the rear of the turret!
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Most of the t34 AI comes from the hull mg does it not? How does the KV1 hull stack up?
Posts: 783
Imo these units would far better designed if their durability come from veterancy and/or if there gun where nerf in one area either AT or AI.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
I do not like locking role requirements behind veterency, I cannot agree with this. Also their guns are not good enough to warrant nerfing.
I'm honestly ok with their performance. Neither are dominating the meta and their downsides help offset their durability to cost ratio which is admittedly good.
Downsides being- locking out comets/warspeed(church), takes longer to hit the field due to bonus tech required(church), high pop cost(church), lack of mobility, poor gun for cost, relatively off meta commanders with guards combined arms being the exception(kv-1).
The kv could perhaps have its supply cost increased to 15 or 16 to bring it more inline with the churchill.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
47 | |||||
5 |