Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
a bofors is harder to kill than a schwerer...and it cost only 1/4 fuel from the schwerer...and can brace...and can go into artillery mode...and can use groundattack...and you can chose the target (noo..dont shot the t34...shot the penal!)
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 3114 | Subs: 2
There’s nothing aggressive about putting the Schwerer just outside your base entrance to cover both a fuel and a cutoff.
Posts: 2243
Bofors is more expensive then schwerer, because you get schwerer for free as a part of the tech.
If you can't kill bofors with singular ATG/puppchen, you should not be on balance forum, but strategic one, begging for advise.
Posts: 600
you get schwerer for free as a part of the tech
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
OK so if the OKW T4 is so oppressive and OP why is it never used like that in any decent 1v1? I can't remember ever watching a high level 1v1 where the player went for an aggressive T4 placement.
If you want to remove faction specific tech perks then you can't just take one faction's stuff away and keep the rest.
are you even trying to hide your trolling anymore?
Posts: 3114 | Subs: 2
Bofors is more expensive then schwerer, because you get schwerer for free as a part of the tech.
If you can't kill bofors with singular ATG/puppchen, you should not be on balance forum, but strategic one, begging for advise.
Posts: 4474
Katitof-2018
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
No, you don't get it free. You pay 135 fuel + 200(?) MP to get this building down and therefore unlock tanks and the gun. Just like OST does not get their rifle grenades and Panzergrenadiere "for free", OKW does not get Fausts for free, SOV does not get mobilized reserves for free and USF does not get officers for free. It's part of faction design and you get it as a complete bundle.
Posts: 246
UA
soviets
Posts: 3114 | Subs: 2
I have no problem with it's fuel cost, but it's popcost free and I don't understand why anything of that level of impact shouldn't have a popcost
Imo even bunkers and fps should have a tiny popcost
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
Posts: 600
blablabla ullu blablabla
Posts: 4474
There is literally no justification why it should have 50m range on its main gun (or somewhere near that). All that does is allow it to lock down areas. It should be nerfed down to 40m, which will still allow it to poke at AT infantry closing in.45 if u want that, like this st inf will still outrange ig
Katitof-2018
Posts: 956
Are there really people out there that want OKW to get pop cap nerfs even though they have the most pop cap issues out of all factions in the late game? Seriously?
Posts: 558 | Subs: 1
Posts: 600
 |
|
|
31 | ||
 |
|
|
25 | ||
|
|
|
|
22 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
305 | ||
 |
|
|
204 | ||
 |
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
