Login

russian armor

State of the ISU-152

PAGES (12)down
State of the ISU-152
Option Distribution Votes
44%
53%
3%
Total votes: 109
Vote VOTE! Vote ABSTAIN
22 Jun 2020, 18:25 PM
#1
avatar of Cardboard Tank

Posts: 978

Long story short: Imo a unit that can wipe infantry squads at 70 range does not fit the game. The Brumm was nerfed because it could do that at range 40. It was tuned down to half the range of the ISU(35). Sure it wasn't doctrinal. But the main issue with the ISU-152 is that it hardcounters Paks and Raketens before those can fight back. Brummbär can't do that - it can get off a shot with the vet 1... but that's not a permanent issue like with the ISU.

And countering it with Elefant or JT is not a good option. A unit that can only be countered by going for a doctrine is wrong design because it locks out all the other doctrines.
22 Jun 2020, 18:47 PM
#2
avatar of Acidfreak

Posts: 281

Long story short: Imo a unit that can wipe infantry squads at 70 range does not fit the game. The Brumm was nerfed because it could do that at range 40. It was tuned down to half the range of the ISU(35). Sure it wasn't doctrinal. But the main issue with the ISU-152 is that it hardcounters Paks and Raketens before those can fight back. Brummbär can't do that - it can get off a shot with the vet 1... but that's not a permanent issue like with the ISU.

And countering it with Elefant or JT is not a good option. A unit that can only be countered by going for a doctrine is wrong design because it locks out all the other doctrines.


isu is slow and difficult to maneuver, one can easily swarm it with tank. and I think for the cost the performance is justified especially taking into account the not so good anti tank performance and long reload time
22 Jun 2020, 18:54 PM
#3
avatar of Konsumpartisane

Posts: 14


And countering it with Elefant or JT is not a good option. A unit that can only be countered by going for a doctrine is wrong design because it locks out all the other doctrines.


Countering doctrine with doctrine is fine. Elefant is the better TD (obviously not vs Inf).
22 Jun 2020, 19:00 PM
#4
avatar of blvckdream

Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1

ISU would probably be fine if it didn't come with IL2 bombs and non-doctrinal T34 ram. Elefant and JT don't even work as a proper counter to ISU and there are no other counters to it other than maybe a good Panther + Stuka CAS push.
22 Jun 2020, 19:20 PM
#5
avatar of Darkpiatre

Posts: 282

I think the push of the ISU is what we expect from an Heavy tank, maybe the range is kinda hard to manage, but it is slow af.
22 Jun 2020, 19:44 PM
#6
avatar of Partisanship

Posts: 260

Yeah, it does have a strong wipe potential.
That said, it's a very pricey and doctrinal late game tank so I feel like if you undermine its ability too much, it would probably be somewhat of a useless unit.

I heard there's ways to make it so that certain attacks can only kill "X" amount of models per hits. Maybe nerf it so that it can only wipe out 2 models per hit? That would at least give weapon crews a chance to back off. I'd complain that it would make it too weak versus infantry but if you also improve the scatter on HE so that it hits reliably it should balance it out somewhat.
22 Jun 2020, 19:48 PM
#7
avatar of James Hale

Posts: 574

It's a 152mm howitzer strapped to an armoured chassis; it should be able to wipe a squad if it hits it. It's bad enough that it's been nerfed several times and was given an ammo switch ability a few years ago, as historically the ISU did not need to use AP rounds as it was far more effective to blow parts of an enemy tank off with HE rounds. However, that was a 'balance' decision taken at the time.
22 Jun 2020, 19:51 PM
#8
avatar of Farlion

Posts: 379 | Subs: 1

This unit is perfectly fine, y'all just need to learn to counter it. No, really. Just learn to counter it.
22 Jun 2020, 20:10 PM
#9
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279

I'd say the unit itself is very strong, but arguably balanced in a vacuum. The issue lies more with its commanders including il-2 bombs which can nix heavy counters and even guards to stop a flank in its tracks. Adjust the commanders to be less flexible and make the choice to go isu an actual choice
22 Jun 2020, 20:11 PM
#10
avatar of DonnieChan

Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1

22 Jun 2020, 21:03 PM
#11
avatar of Descolata

Posts: 486

70 range TDs are all problematic, especially on long laney maps.

Their commanders are all too well rounded.
22 Jun 2020, 21:18 PM
#12
avatar of Baba

Posts: 600

Leave it as is. its the wrath of the Rodina embodied in metal and oil
an immovable monstrous god machine
22 Jun 2020, 23:14 PM
#13
avatar of Fire and Terror

Posts: 306

The problem with isu lies in its armor and mobility.

For a heavy assoult gun it isnt that slow. And can still bounce a lot of shots.

I think either reduce armor or reduce speed would be a good choice for the Isu. That way it would be easier to dive and axis woundt have to rely so heavy on Ele and JT
22 Jun 2020, 23:21 PM
#14
avatar of Descolata

Posts: 486

Issue is, Axis reliance on Ele an JT is not super ISU dependent. ISU is pretty weak to a Panther, Ele and JT club enemy heavy TDs.
22 Jun 2020, 23:53 PM
#15
avatar of Farlion

Posts: 379 | Subs: 1

Having read this twice now, in what world does a Panther counter an ISU?
23 Jun 2020, 00:23 AM
#16
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279

jump backJump back to quoted post22 Jun 2020, 23:53 PMFarlion
Having red this twice now, in what world does a Panther counter an ISU?

By shooting it.
23 Jun 2020, 00:31 AM
#17
avatar of ShadowLinkX37
Director of Moderation Badge

Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4


By shooting it.


The panther has difficulty countering 60 range jacksons and fireflys. How is the 70 range ISU countered moreso?
23 Jun 2020, 00:47 AM
#18
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279



The panther has difficulty countering 60 range jacksons and fireflys. How is the 70 range ISU countered moreso?

The 60 range jacksons and fireflies have these twisty m'jiggers on top of their hulls that let's the shoot shoot look one way while the vroomy vroom moves in another. There's a reason you didn't list the also 60 range su85s or su76 and I reckon you'll find that particular trait is shared with the isu.

I was mostly joking in my post, as the support of an isu will help prevent a single Panther from getting the isu of course but that's the entire point of support. Much like a comet isn't going to off anything but the hellen kellerest elefant player
23 Jun 2020, 01:18 AM
#19
avatar of ShadowLinkX37
Director of Moderation Badge

Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4


The 60 range jacksons and fireflies have these twisty m'jiggers on top of their hulls that let's the shoot shoot look one way while the vroomy vroom moves in another. There's a reason you didn't list the also 60 range su85s or su76 and I reckon you'll find that particular trait is shared with the isu.

I was mostly joking in my post, as the support of an isu will help prevent a single Panther from getting the isu of course but that's the entire point of support. Much like a comet isn't going to off anything but the hellen kellerest elefant player


The reason I didn't add them was because I'm not going to list every 60 range unit in the game. Not that the su76 needs to be listed because of its current state though.

That's the point of this thread though. Whether or not the ISU is too good is up for debate, but because it comes in a doctrine that allows it to contest for best doctrine in the game, a panther doesn't exactly counter the ISU.
23 Jun 2020, 01:22 AM
#20
avatar of Jiav

Posts: 32

ah yes counter the ISU with a single panther

in what game mode and rank would this actually work, outside of a 1 to 1000 situation.
PAGES (12)down
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
Willy Pete: @Rosbone Ahh I missed that memo. I still think its a bad decision though. Adds frustration for players and isnt gonna make them that much money
Last Thursday, 15:46 PM
Rosbone: It is also good they left it free until after the free to play weekend. Points for that.
Last Thursday, 09:34 AM
Rosbone: But I agree, the cost to get a full decent Coh game pushing $115 US is not the best idea. Especially when it needs so much more work for casuals.
Last Thursday, 09:32 AM
Rosbone: To be fair, it was a thank you to early fans right? They said it was not free for long and it would become a pay DLC at some point.
Last Thursday, 09:30 AM
Willy Pete: Re-releasing free DLC so they can charge new players money for it. Brilliant marketing strategy :clap:
Last Thursday, 04:31 AM
Soheil: Coh2 still broken server ?
Last Tuesday, 18:27 PM
Rosbone: Congrats to Relic. Looks like Coh3 has finally usurped Coh2 s the popular Coh. You smell terrific. :snfQuinn:.
Last Monday, 02:46 AM
Nickbn: and again someone else replies. I mean come on guys. Give @adamírcz a chance
22 Mar 2025, 14:00 PM
Willy Pete: @Nickbn you didn't ask a question, and this is a chat box...
20 Mar 2025, 13:11 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone it's incredibly rude to speak on someone elses behalf, especially when a question is directly adressed to them. I understand your passion for the subject at hand but I want to hear from him.
20 Mar 2025, 10:16 AM
Rosbone: @Nickbn No, I am just saying people should not be using any Relic owned forum since they have proven they ban anyone who says true things about Coh3.
18 Mar 2025, 19:01 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone do you speak on his behalf? I didn't know. In that case keep us updated please.
18 Mar 2025, 16:47 PM
Rosbone: #RelicModdedEchoChamber
16 Mar 2025, 17:54 PM
Rosbone: @Nickbn True except, the only people on the Relic Discord/Reddit/Steam are brain washed monkey zealots. They wont even understand what @adamírcz is talking about. Anyone else is banned.
16 Mar 2025, 17:54 PM
Nickbn: @adamírcz might be a better idea to voice this to relic directly than to voice it here, in a shoutbox of a nearly deade fansite #justsaying...
16 Mar 2025, 16:36 PM
webdesign-muenchen-w: @Rosbone it is sick
14 Mar 2025, 22:09 PM
aerafield: @adamírcz aren't the first two disconnects free every day?
14 Mar 2025, 19:26 PM
Rosbone: It is so unlike Relic to punish its fans and community.
14 Mar 2025, 12:07 PM
adamírcz: So, I just got a leaver penalty without even getting onto the loading screen because of the game disconnecting, bravo Relic
14 Mar 2025, 10:45 AM
Rosbone: It is an indicator of the very short sighted capitalist view that plagues any company where leadership does not understand the product.
13 Mar 2025, 20:00 PM

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

517 users are online: 517 guests
5 posts in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
75 posts in the last month
Registered members: 53055
Welcome our newest member, tructiepbongda365com
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM