Your knowledge of axis factions seems very superficial. Can U show Your player card?
Level 13 players asking for playercards now? Maybe discuss the topic?
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Your knowledge of axis factions seems very superficial. Can U show Your player card?
Posts: 1351
Level 13 players asking for playercards now? Maybe discuss the topic?
Posts: 1351
http://www.companyofheroes.com/leaderboards#profile/steam/76561198035553470/standings
please stop asking people for playercards and stop pretending like you're a lv17 player with sly wording about "varying ranks".
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
I'm 17 with UKF.
Posts: 32
Posts: 1351
easy fix would prolly be to reduce its range to 60 and or the scope, so you actually need to rely on scouting and be more vunerable to ATGs
Posts: 1351
Yeah and I'm rank 1 with usf and okw.
Now stop with the playercards crap and actually discuss the topic.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
I don't know why you treat it as a revelation that the best AT brawler in the game combined with the best ATG in the game can actually deal with a hybrid unit at one of its weak spots. I would rather say this is quite expected.
Now more to the point: provide some data on your claims, because my calculations say otherwise.
In your scenario - 20 range, ISU vs Panther - the ISU has the same offensive performance as a SU85 with an expected TTK of 32,8 (ISU) vs 32,9 (SU85) (with very slight estimations regarding pen chances since I don't have the tools with me to make a 100% accurate calculation).
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
It can be checked. There are people who can check those hidden ranks. Why heaven't You checked the guy who started it (Sumi)?
Posts: 32
I'd say 50 for AT so that TDs (ost don't really have them) can be closer and trade blows. OKW AT tank would outrange it.
Posts: 1351
thx for the info. I know most of it. I just thought you could check hidden ranks. I'll play one game for stormjager maybe
Posts: 1351
no, that would kill the unit
Posts: 5279
Posts: 1954
As of this moment, there are only 1449 people ranking with UKF. Ladders with less than 4K people means that they have ranks not represented on them. Would there be no ladder decay/removal most people would drop ranking places as there hidden ELO/MMR is not high enough to sustain those places.
In the case of UKF, ranks 15, 14 and 13 are non existant.
Compare it to OH with 3122 or SU with 2666. To fill the numbers, OKW at 2536 and USF at an historical low of 1746.
Biggest ladder atm is 2v2 AT. It has 7203/6942 teams.
Posts: 930
Thank you for your opinion.
Your contribution to this balance discussion will not be forgotten
Posts: 833
Posts: 66
Posts: 1289
Insanity happens when players build ZiS guns to use them as mortars and pak/mg clearing tools, and You keep defending such design, and don't see a blatant balance issue. Same here. ISU is simply better than axis units of similar price.
Posts: 1351
The abundant dual purpose units of soviets stems from them not having ai upgrades nades or powerfull team weapons and tanks stock. Its a good and interrsting design. Just as ost have stronger team weapons actual nades and strong tanks, but squishier inf.
You wanna give the zis a snare or high pen high damage mode? Give it retreat? And most important give soviets normal nades stock?
In regards to the isu152 if you nerf it by removing its at and lowering its ai, it will have to become a lot cheaper. A lot cheaper, and then people will still bitch about it.
18 | |||||
11 | |||||
27 | |||||
8 | |||||
3 |