Gaurds Assualt Troops
13 May 2020, 08:02 AM
#1
Posts: 187
Feel like this is the most underused and rarely seen unit in the game. The fact that it is locked behind a doctorine and further locked behind a HT combo package is just brutal tbh. Maybe get rid of the HT since the player can build one from tech?
Anyways, I dont think they are worth the cost since they really lack on abilities, sure they have a good firepower from recent patch, but i think it can't be put to good use without supporting abilities like smoke nade or camaflouge when in cover or Tactical assault similar to Stormtroopers and Paratroopers. I dont think a regular greande and trip flare is worth 510 MP (with HT which i dont see a point since it comes very late in the game when there are plenty of AT in the field).
I suggest make them a separate call in unit with ~340-80 MP with extra above mentioned abilities.
13 May 2020, 08:09 AM
#2
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Accept the fact there is a doctrine with 4 abilities only and move on, like everyone else.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
13 May 2020, 08:12 AM
#3
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
You have already created the third such topic about the Assault Guard. And yes, this design is stupid. But there are defenders of such an absurd design. I myself played on the weekend with the Assault Guard, and Jeez, the only thing that’s good in this commander is the M4C. But M4C is not worth choosing a commander
13 May 2020, 08:17 AM
#4
Posts: 187
You have already created the third such topic about the Assault Guard. And yes, this design is stupid. But there are defenders of such an absurd design. I myself played on the weekend with the Assault Guard, and Jeez, the only thing that’s good in this commander is the M4C. But M4C is not worth choosing a commander
I didnt, since this is the frist from me.
Not just M4C, Dsk HMG is good too but overall not very worth it.
13 May 2020, 08:26 AM
#5
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
I didnt, since this is the frist from me.
Not just M4C, Dsk HMG is good too but overall not very worth it.
Well, I don’t really like DShK. DShK has too small a cone of fire, although it has a good suppression. I would prefer Maxim more for the defense of the position due to the fact that it is more difficult to flank. Although Maxim is not the best machine gun. So yes, in this commander, only M4C is useful to me.
13 May 2020, 08:33 AM
#6
Posts: 498
Yeah, I also made a thread about it, with about 50%-50% voting for keeping and removing the M5 half track from the call-in. Perhaps replacing the HT with something more interesting, like the USF M3 HT would be better, as that thing can drop medkits.
13 May 2020, 08:37 AM
#7
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Yeah, I also made a thread about it, with about 50%-50% voting for keeping and removing the M5 half track from the call-in. Perhaps replacing the HT with something more interesting, like the USF M3 HT would be better, as that thing can drop medkits.
Well, its lend lease doctrine, let's go wild and slap UKF spec weapons HT
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
13 May 2020, 08:44 AM
#8
Posts: 498
Well, its lend lease doctrine, let's go wild and slap UKF spec weapons HT
Bruh, you don't want to see an SU doctrine that can equip its own penals with vickers.
13 May 2020, 08:45 AM
#9
Posts: 3114 | Subs: 2
Bruh, you don't want to see an SU doctrine that can equip its own penals with vickers.
We will call them Oberpenals.
13 May 2020, 08:47 AM
#10
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
We will call them Oberpenals.
We can shorten that to Openals.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
13 May 2020, 08:47 AM
#11
Posts: 498
We will call them Oberpenals.
Or penaliser squad!
13 May 2020, 08:50 AM
#12
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
Instead of DShK I would prefer Bofors. Since the USSR cannot build defensive structures.
13 May 2020, 09:58 AM
#13
Posts: 1220
Instead of DShK I would prefer Bofors. Since the USSR cannot build defensive structures.that would be cool
13 May 2020, 10:56 AM
#14
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Tactical assault should be removed, not added to more units. Remove that cancer from the game ktnxbye
Guards should be buildable at T4 as soon as the assault group unlocks.
Tbh I'd love to see the M4C take a dive and be replaced by a Valentine.
OPnals
Hardest NO on the planet.
Guards should be buildable at T4 as soon as the assault group unlocks.
Tbh I'd love to see the M4C take a dive and be replaced by a Valentine.
We can shorten that to Openals.
OPnals
Instead of DShK I would prefer Bofors.
Hardest NO on the planet.
 | Playercard of T.R. Stormjäger | |||||||||||||||
|
13 May 2020, 11:03 AM
#15
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
Hardest NO on the planet.
Then please give the Soviets the opportunity to build a machine gun nest without commanders. This is ridiculous, the Soviets are the only faction without the ability to build defensive structures.
13 May 2020, 11:06 AM
#16
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Then please give the Soviets the opportunity to build a machine gun nest without commanders. This is ridiculous, the Soviets are the only faction without the ability to build defensive structures.
Ask the balance team to put MG nests in the community defense doctrine. Cucking the lend lease doctrine with a useless bofors replacing the OP chad af Dshka is not acceptable.
| Playercard of T.R. Stormjäger | |||||||||||||||
|
13 May 2020, 11:08 AM
#17
Posts: 1220
im sure even with bofors that doctrine will be still mediocre but definitely more fun
Hardest NO on the planet.
13 May 2020, 11:11 AM
#18
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
im sure even with bofors that doctrine will be still mediocre but definitely more fun
Bofors would cuck lend lease for good.
The doctrine has 3 good ingredients: Dshka, Guards, M4C
Currently Dshka is amazing, Guards are limited and expensive, M4C is garbage
You fix the doctrine by fixing Guards and deleting the M4C from the game, not destroying the Dshka for the nerfed useless Bofors.
edit: deleting M4C is hyperbole, but you get the point.
| Playercard of T.R. Stormjäger | |||||||||||||||
|
13 May 2020, 11:13 AM
#19
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
Ask the balance team to put MG nests in the community defense doctrine. Cucking the lend lease doctrine with a useless bofors replacing the OP chad af Dshka is not acceptable.
No, not OP. the Soviets have lower repair speed; there are no British buildings that are synergistic with Bofors.
A simple machine-gun bunker in the commander is nonsense. The commanders should have advanced units, such as: concrete bunker, AA guns, etc. Each faction should be able to build machine-gun nests, barbed wire and anti-tank traps without a commander - because these are the basic structures.
13 May 2020, 11:36 AM
#20
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Bofors would cuck lend lease for good.
The doctrine has 3 good ingredients: Dshka, Guards, M4C
Currently Dshka is amazing, Guards are limited and expensive, M4C is garbage
You fix the doctrine by fixing Guards and deleting the M4C from the game, not destroying the Dshka for the nerfed useless Bofors.
edit: deleting M4C is hyperbole, but you get the point.
M4C is superior to Ostheer call in PzJ.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
36 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
17 | ||
|
|
|
|
7 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.939410.696+5
- 4.35459.857-1
- 5.599234.719+7
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
11
Download
1265
Board Info
1037 users are online:
1037 guests
1 post in the last 24h
10 posts in the last week
27 posts in the last month
10 posts in the last week
27 posts in the last month
Registered members: 50004
Welcome our newest member, Abtik Services
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Abtik Services
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM