Did you or did not compare the design with M36?
If I have misunderstood you feel free to clarify exactly what you want to say.
You're struggling again, so let me help you.
He basically said if it was an allied unit, the nerf screeches would not end.
A laudatio on the T70, the Puma, 251 and 222
10 May 2020, 09:25 AM
#21
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
You're struggling again, so let me help you.
He basically said if it was an allied unit, the nerf screeches would not end.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
10 May 2020, 09:32 AM
#22
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
Thanks Katitof.
10 May 2020, 12:06 PM
#24
Posts: 186 | Subs: 1
I like OP's post, quality post like these a nice to read.
On the SU76 I had this idea for a while. Make it a mini ISU152 (now hear me out).
Make it switch between HE and AP like the ISU152 or the Sherman.
The HE fire in a low velocity arc like the current barrage ability but auto fires (think turretless scot).
The AP fires in in a flat high velocity like the normal shot it does now.
Damage and pen values could be adjusted according to what would be balanced.
This would make the SU76 a more versatile unit while still having roles and clear weaknesses.
Low armor and health, no turret, no machinegun and the ammo swap time would punish over extension and spam.
On the SU76 I had this idea for a while. Make it a mini ISU152 (now hear me out).
Make it switch between HE and AP like the ISU152 or the Sherman.
The HE fire in a low velocity arc like the current barrage ability but auto fires (think turretless scot).
The AP fires in in a flat high velocity like the normal shot it does now.
Damage and pen values could be adjusted according to what would be balanced.
This would make the SU76 a more versatile unit while still having roles and clear weaknesses.
Low armor and health, no turret, no machinegun and the ammo swap time would punish over extension and spam.
10 May 2020, 15:50 PM
#25
Posts: 28
Ammo toggles are meant to limit powerful general-purpose guns like the ones on the ISU-152 or M4A3. The SU-76 is a cheap unit that shouldn't need one.
10 May 2020, 17:05 PM
#26
Posts: 4474
it's a puma but more defensive , that's it
Actually I do not want to discuss single stats but about what people think good (light) vehicle design is and why. Do you think the AEC is a well designed vehicle then?
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
10 May 2020, 18:17 PM
#27
1 
Posts: 147
Ammo toggles are meant to limit powerful general-purpose guns like the ones on the ISU-152 or M4A3. The SU-76 is a cheap unit that shouldn't need one.
The mini Soviet AT gun has ammo switch, so we already have cheap units with this function in the faction.
10 May 2020, 18:43 PM
#28
Posts: 28
The mini Soviet AT gun has ammo switch, so we already have cheap units with this function in the faction.
The 45mm AT gun is not a good unit to mimick.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
24 | ||
 |
|
|
15 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.35057.860+15
- 3.1110614.644+11
- 4.643231.736+3
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.921406.694-1
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.17146.788+1
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1237
Board Info
453 users are online:
453 guests
0 post in the last 24h
4 posts in the last week
35 posts in the last month
4 posts in the last week
35 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49227
Welcome our newest member, Brzez538
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Brzez538
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM