My last personal wishlist for teamgame adjustments
![avatar of blvckdream](/uploads/avatar/21827.jpg?updated=1545085779)
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
![avatar of aerafield](/images/avatars/april14_08.png?updated=1398148410)
Posts: 3041 | Subs: 3
Stuka dive bomb is useless if it cannot uncap point.
Im talking about Victory Points and not ressource points. As someone mentioned earlier, axis can autowin a super close VP game if 2 players drop a stuka dive on the 2 enemy VP sectors (or neutralize 1 with inf then drop the last one fast)
![avatar of aerafield](/images/avatars/april14_08.png?updated=1398148410)
Posts: 3041 | Subs: 3
Assault Commando. You say obvious reasons but I don't see the obvious reason? I rarely see this used in team games.
A while ago they changed its accuracy bonus from 15% to 25%, means its on par now with Valiant assault or for mother russia, and both are at 6 CP
Its even better actually cuz of the recon planes
![avatar of DonnieChan](/uploads/avatar/7689.jpg?updated=1380589526)
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
true you get the best games as random and not as arranged team usually
i don't think so. Rage about random teammates is why is started 1v1
![avatar of JulianSnow](/uploads/avatar/28825.jpg?updated=1537525999)
Posts: 321
Wehrmacht -> - spotting scopes removed from the elefant (not from the whole doctrine).
doesn't give the change you might want as one can set a 251 with spotting scopes right next to it and have the same result. Even better since the Elefant can rotate and keep vision, which it can't with its own scope. Have been doing this myself last few weeks, works quite well.
i don't think so. Rage about random teammates is why is started 1v1
+1, little kids constantly spamming the 'ping'.
![avatar of aerafield](/images/avatars/april14_08.png?updated=1398148410)
Posts: 3041 | Subs: 3
Mostly great ideas only this..
doesn't give the change you might want as one can set a 251 with spotting scopes right next to it and have the same result. Even better since the Elefant can rotate and keep vision, which it can't with its own scope. Have been doing this myself last few weeks, works quite well.
Oh yes, totally. But then it requires at least a bit more setup from the player instead of a single 300 damage 70 range tank destroyer that spots for itself
![avatar of mrgame2](/images/avatars/sniper_soviet.png?updated=1394378846)
Posts: 1794
Im talking about Victory Points and not ressource points. As someone mentioned earlier, axis can autowin a super close VP game if 2 players drop a stuka dive on the 2 enemy VP sectors (or neutralize 1 with inf then drop the last one fast)
nein, it is all in good fun. keep it!
another change bofors and aec both should be techable!
![avatar of SupremeStefan](/uploads/avatar/14291.jpg?updated=1428010492)
Posts: 1220
![avatar of mrgame2](/images/avatars/sniper_soviet.png?updated=1394378846)
Posts: 1794
![avatar of SuperHansFan](/uploads/avatar/28376.png?updated=1592028858)
Posts: 833
Some really good ideas here. I'd vote "yes to all" except for:
The land-mattress reinforce cost is a trade-off for it not being destroyed as easily. All other mobile on-map arty (rocket/regular/etc.) is extremely fragile; and can be completely destroyed with most off-maps, direct hits with on-map, or a dive with a cheap unit. The land-mattress, while it can be easily decrewed, cannot be easily destroyed - thus, the resource investment is a lot more safe (you're paying for the weapon, not the crew). If the weapon's health itself was decreased to match a Stuka, for example, then this would be fine. Basically; yes, if a direct hit by on-map arty destroys the crew and weapon - no, otherwise.
It would be better to replace both with either a recon pass or recon loiter. Zero-counter recon just doesn't fit the game.
No, it's not. Its currently an inconsistent RNG wiping machine. Its both incredibly frustrating to use, and to play against.
Land mattress dies in two tank or Pak shots
When the targeting on the LM got changed they should have reduced pack up time now it can be killed so quick. It's kind of lame right now
![avatar of Vipper](/images/no_av.png)
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Oh yes, totally. But then it requires at least a bit more setup from the player instead of a single 300 damage 70 range tank destroyer that spots for itself
Think you over estimate spotting scopes on casemate TDs. As soon as they rotate to fire the vision is gone.
That is what I suggest that spotting scope could be removed from Elefant but have the vision bonus linker for a second or so (while also adding permanent 5-10 sight, keep total sigh the same).
![avatar of aerafield](/images/avatars/april14_08.png?updated=1398148410)
Posts: 3041 | Subs: 3
Think you over estimate spotting scopes on casemate TDs. As soon as they rotate to fire the vision is gone.
A 70 range unit should never be able to spot for itself, no matter the circumstances.
Also, an elefant often "waits" for targets. Yes, if it rotates you lose the sight bonus but its not hard to manually rotate onto the enemy tank completely once you spotted it for a second
![avatar of DonnieChan](/uploads/avatar/7689.jpg?updated=1380589526)
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
Land mattress dies in two tank or Pak shots
When the targeting on the LM got changed they should have reduced pack up time now it can be killed so quick. It's kind of lame right now
if a tank or a pak attacks your artillery, you did something wrong
![avatar of thedarkarmadillo](/images/avatars/uberkubel.png?updated=1414778283)
Posts: 5279
A 70 range unit should never be able to spot for itself, no matter the circumstances.
Also, an elefant often "waits" for targets. Yes, if it rotates you lose the sight bonus but its not hard to manually rotate onto the enemy tank completely once you spotted it for a second
Tbh 60 range units shouldn't either. I'd like to see su85 focus sight looked at.
![avatar of mrgame2](/images/avatars/sniper_soviet.png?updated=1394378846)
Posts: 1794
Tbh 60 range units shouldn't either. I'd like to see su85 focus sight looked at.
2 su85 is way better than elefant in 2v2
![avatar of Sturmpanther](/uploads/avatar/6242.jpg?updated=1510962354)
![Lead Strategist Badge](/images/badges/badge_LEAD_STRATEGIST.png)
Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36
(I agree with most of the wishes btw)
![avatar of thedarkarmadillo](/images/avatars/uberkubel.png?updated=1414778283)
Posts: 5279
2 su85 is way better than elefant in 2v2
OK..? 2 of any unit equalling about the same cost is generally better. You almost always have more DPS and mobility options. The elefant excels in reliability. That's what you get it for.
![avatar of KoRneY](/uploads/avatar/25018.png?updated=1583020726)
Posts: 682
![avatar of mrgame2](/images/avatars/sniper_soviet.png?updated=1394378846)
Posts: 1794
elefant is not reliably because how slow it shoots and moves.
Livestreams
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
442 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
17 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
17 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
10 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
6 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.41662.870+14
- 2.659233.739+2
- 3.299158.654+3
- 4.286110.722-2
- 5.309114.730+5
- 6.12243.739-1
- 7.193100.659+3
- 8.10829.788+9
- 9.370283.567+3
- 10.1171650.643+2
Replay highlight
-
cblanco ★
-
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel
-
Heartless Jäger
![Einhoven Country](/images/maps/4p_enhoven_country.jpg)
![Honor](/images/buttons/HONOR_icon.png)
![Download](/images/buttons/DOWNLOAD_icon.png)
Board Info
19 posts in the last week
45 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Wnukowskit
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM