Looks Like I Owe Sander An Apology

Jump back to quoted post23 Apr 2020, 10:11 AMVipper

The thing is that most tech are messed up and it is not simply a T-70 issue and I simply do not accept the argument that T-70 has to be "OP", it does not.

There are number of fixes for this:
One can delay 222/FHT by reintroducing 221
One lower the price of OKW T2 to be the same as T2 and move the extra cost to engineer and make a prerequest for T2

And I am not sure why in your opinion the T-70 should be a counter to PzII or FHT, Soviet have zis and where given PTRS to deal with these threats, if these option do not work there is something wrong in that design.

Your solution of making T3 come with a previous building simply makes thing worse as even more powerful unit become available earlier. This is direction that should simply be stopped. When something does not work one should consider reverting back instead of continuing down the same path.

Jump back to quoted post23 Apr 2020, 10:23 AMKatitof

Have you considered the possibility that in context of other factions units compared to what opposition it faces, it is not op? If it was, it would receive rework akin to that of Stuart or 222.

Jump back to quoted post23 Apr 2020, 10:23 AMKatitof

How reintroduction of weak unit will make people not go for strong one?

Jump back to quoted post23 Apr 2020, 10:23 AMKatitof

Do you know what FHT does to ptrs penals or you just drive straight into satchel range? Only AT rifle unit in game that can counter it are guards and only thanks to button, not PTRS.

Jump back to quoted post23 Apr 2020, 10:23 AMKatitof

If you want to make a unit significantly weaker then it is currently, you need to allow it significantly faster and vice versa - that's the reason 222 does not cost 15 fuel anymore.

Jump back to quoted post23 Apr 2020, 10:23 AMKatitof

Also, what you want to revert about T-70?
It received only nerfs for couple of years straight, in fact it never received a singular lone buff, any buff it received always came with multiple nerfs, making overall performance lower then before the change.

Jump back to quoted post23 Apr 2020, 07:12 AMMr Carmine

The m5 just arrives to late to have a big enough impact imo.

Jump back to quoted post23 Apr 2020, 17:27 PMSkysTheLimit

It's the best AA unit in the game. The planes you would be shooting down arrive even later

Jump back to quoted post23 Apr 2020, 18:42 PMMr Carmine

If it arrives so late and the best way to use is having it somewhere in the back it needs something usefull to do. As soviets have the least and most restrictive stock healing by far having the m5 be able to slowly heal is a no brainer imo.

Jump back to quoted post24 Apr 2020, 00:06 AMSkysTheLimit

I have no problem with m5 getting healing. But i think it should lose the ability to heal if you get the quad upgrade

In team games I build one almost every match as soviets, it's worth it for the AA even if it never does anything else

I have no clue why the 251 got healing. Ost didn't need that at all