Raketens are too good

Jump back to quoted post17 Mar 2020, 15:46 PMBelgboi

when i started playing this game after a good bit of heroes and generals, men of war assault squad 2 robz mod and warthunder i was pretty insulted at how they handled the game but especially vehicles.
The infantry weapons make no sense, the squad sizes are the biggest BS ever, the Puma is absolute BS and don't even get me started on stuff like the scott and stuart and stugs

this game is the definition of random game that has a visual ww2 flavour but has pretty much nothing in common with ww2 combat aside from the visuals

Jump back to quoted post16 Mar 2020, 21:30 PMLoopDloop

Getting rid of retreat would fix the last bits of the cheese with this unit.

Jump back to quoted post17 Mar 2020, 20:37 PMKatitof

Umm... you do realize that this game was immersive arcade RTS? And not any kind of simulator?

Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2020, 13:52 PMT.R. Stormjäger

Fixed

Jump back to quoted post18 Mar 2020, 11:23 AMBelgboi

yeah no i'm just sharing how I was pretty put off at first from the game, It for sure still has fun moments
massive balance issues in my eyes but it's still a good game, maybe it could benefit a bit from more sim like aspects but that would be mainly for vehicles and not much else

Jump back to quoted post26 Mar 2020, 20:26 PMKurobane

Retreat needs to get removed.

Jump back to quoted post26 Mar 2020, 20:26 PMKurobane

Retreat needs to get removed.

Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2020, 12:03 PMachpawel

or the price increased to 320

Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2020, 12:17 PMVipper

That would make OKW even more weak vs M3/WC51/UC.

Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2020, 12:32 PMachpawel

They wouldn't be able to produce so many infantry squads early if they built a rak. They would have to delay their infantry a bit - imo it would be good. Either more infantry or an AT. Now they keep spamming volks and pios and are very overwhelming.

Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2020, 12:32 PMachpawel

IMO making volks more expensive or less potent isn't a good idea. Making a rak more expensive would deal with two problems - would sove infantry oppression and account for the great performance and utility of the rak.

Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2020, 12:45 PMVipper

That simply because of their tech system that does not allow them many different build options.

Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2020, 12:45 PMVipper

I doubt the RW has better performance or utility than cheaper USF ATG.

Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2020, 12:32 PMachpawel

the great performance and utility of the rak.

Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2020, 12:55 PMT.R. Stormjäger

Noob

Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2020, 12:56 PMachpawel

noob yourself ..but seriously. Why do you think its utility and performace is bad?

Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2020, 13:00 PMT.R. Stormjäger

I don't think it's bad. I think it's abhorrent.

It's the worst AT gun and that's a fact.

Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2020, 13:01 PMachpawel

Don't you think that the fact is has 5 men crew and can retreat and can camo needs to be reflected in the price?

Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2020, 13:01 PMachpawel

Don't you think that the fact is has 5 men crew and can retreat and can camo needs to be reflected in the price?

Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2020, 14:50 PMPrinceps

And the fact that every tank 2 shot it frontaly ... is that also reflected?

While Zis tanking 5 Tiger shots...