Change to Airlanding officier
Posts: 888
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
I think Royal Engineers actually preform worse than Rear Echeleon Troops in combat.
Really???
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Alright, give the damme squad full thompson with pg's stg profile. Happy?
If it has 4 entities, costs 340 and comes at the same time frame it would be less of an issue.
Om the serious side.
Even if officer is moved to T1 and toned, I will prefer to keep the light gammon bomb, it do decently vs garrison useful in more overall situations than flame nade, can be locked behind platoon CP.
Actually incendiary gammon (VG stas) from start is probably superior.
Additional model then should be consider move to vet 1 since the unit have less fire power.
It could start with 5 entities from vet 0 with lower meg profiles.
Recon, should be keep if possible , it is a handy tool since ukf lack direct recon options. Removed vet requirement but require company CP to be active will make it an equivalent to major.
Also, officer can use a hammer/anvil - like upgrade system, hammer provide thompson, anvil is rifles and bren.
see my suggestion.
Posts: 4474
codguy still has to get 1 stats right so i wouldn't believe him
Really???
Posts: 1484
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
UKF doesn't even have an effective long range infantry unit any more. Panzerfusilers will counter any Brit infantry and murder Tommies badly.
Double Bren Infantry Sections have 22,5 DPS at 35 range.
G43 Panzerfusiliers have 11,6 DPS at 35 range.
Posts: 4474
mods won't ban him and he is free to spread miss information
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
If it has 4 entities, costs 340 and comes at the same time frame it would be less of an issue.
And not being limited to 1, deal :v
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
And not being limited to 1, deal :v
That is simply homogenization. I would rather have an earlier Hammer/anvil choice bren become closer to BAR available to 5 man squad and Vicker-k available only to 4 men squads.
Posts: 3053
Actually heroic charge was very powerful and actually since the Air landing officer lack camo om can easily give brens and use him as a long range unit.
PG are not good on the move compare to CQB units they lose half their DPS while moving. Only the G43 PG are good on the move.
Have you ever used pgrens sir?
Another thing to note about airlanding officer is that commando stens are useless beyond 10 range.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Have you ever used pgrens sir?
Yes I have
Another thing to note about airlanding officer is that commando stens are useless beyond 10 range.
The majority of SMG where designed like that and for good reason. "Elite" Thompson where the exception because USF elite infantry already come with great weapons.
Posts: 211
Double Bren Infantry Sections have 22,5 DPS at 35 range.
G43 Panzerfusiliers have 11,6 DPS at 35 range.
Correct
Although a case can be made that Panzer Fusis are still superior due to less sunken cost, utility, and better vet placement.
Posts: 888
Really???
If you upgrade RETs with Double BARs or 1 BAR and 1 Flamethrower with the Rifle Company doctrine the Rear Echeleons are surprisingly good. They get a 5th man at Vet 3. I think it's easier to vet them though because they're available right away where as Royal Engineers aren't available for a while so by the time they hit the field there fighting vetted Grenadiers, Volks or newly deployed Panzergrens which they're not match for any of those.
Posts: 5279
Double Bren Infantry Sections have 22,5 DPS at 35 range.
G43 Panzerfusiliers have 11,6 DPS at 35 range.
Slight cost and timing disparity there though... Next to conscripts and lmg Obers!
Posts: 888
Correct
Although a case can be made that Panzer Fusis are still superior due to less sunken cost, utility, and better vet placement.
Essentially. Double Bren Infantry Sections will be available right when you've got swarms of 6 man, vet 2 or 3, G43 equipped Panzerfuzilers.
Also I've noticed Infantry Sections take much longer to reinforce, but maybe it's just me.
Posts: 930
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
Slight cost and timing disparity there though... Next to conscripts and lmg Obers!
And what do cost and timing disparities have to do with me only quoting the DPS numbers to prove that the claim that "UKF doesn't even have an effective long range infantry unit any more" is false?
Posts: 888
Livestreams
91 | |||||
14 | |||||
1 | |||||
124 | |||||
109 | |||||
20 | |||||
18 | |||||
14 | |||||
7 | |||||
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.653231.739+13
- 2.840223.790+3
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.599234.719+7
- 5.278108.720+29
- 6.927408.694+1
- 7.645.928+5
- 8.306114.729+2
- 9.1123623.643+4
- 10.266140.655+1
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
5 posts in the last week
20 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Chmura
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM