I'm not talking about soviets, I'm talking about mechanics.
Take of your bias against me for a moment and see arguments, not what you want to see.
Follow up on your logic, you must be pretty damn upset about ost turbomortar nerf.
Ost never relied on snipers vs sov and they never will, mortars and HMGs were always superior choices.
I freely admit to being biased. I am biased against all fanboys. But you man, I expect better of you. You've been around since the release and are STILL the same. So I guess I just get, idk, disappointed. Not that you ought to care one whit (and I mean that sincerely) but since you raised it, I thought I ought to clarify.
OT
I'm actually quite happy about ost mortar nerf ty. I made several posts to that effect in the Wehrmacht mortar thread.
And I did see the argument. I think I gave you a valid counter. And as far as ost never relying on snipers vs soviets? Really? Its arguably the best early game unit vs sov tier 2 and shocks. But I digress. I'm not trying to hold a strategy discussion with you.
Here's the heart of the issue:
The only difference between what I proposed (Target table rof adjustments to ost/sov snipers vs rifles & tommies/volks instead of a general RoF adjustment) is that that way ost balance vs sov weapon crews and squads doesn't suffer, and UKF and Brits don't have to worry so much about ost sniper. Everyone wins. But you're still against it?
So really, what exactly is your problem with it?