Profile of GachiGasm

You are clearly trolling. Watch any streamer and the 1st question asked is "Any good games today?". I could link 1000 twitch clips of rank 30 teams against rank 2000 teams in 2v2 on streams. The server is complete trash and Relic are grossly incompetent.

To be frank here, while CoH2 doesnt have huge player base (which tecnically could have soled the problem most likely) I think the main problem comes from 2 factors:

1) How premades are redistrebuted and how they are matched. Because for CoH2 premade of 4 ranks 20 is equal to premade of ranks 1 as long as their premade rank is somewhat equal.
Not to mention that, most likely premades are given priority in game searcher, since they can fill lobby faster

2) Whole ladder system in CoH2 is redundant. For instance, we can have guy with 4k games on one faction, being rank 14 with 40 or less W\L ratio, but he will be matched with other rank 14 who might aswell have 100 games, with 70% W\L.
What matters for MM is the rank not actuall skill which and considering that gaps between ranks are huge, its no wonder. I mean possition 700 is considered a rank 14 in 4v4, but possition 2500 is also considered rank 14, dispite potentual skill gap is huge.

Let alone the fact that most of the competitive RTS games have Seasons for MP, which either wipes guys who ranked up using cheese or any sort of abuse, aswell as it allows player who learnt how to play to actually get a decent rank, but in CoH2 you will be stack in limbo if you got shit rank during your learning period.

But still CoH3 is not made by "old" relic, its pretty much different people working on it, who had their own fuck up with DoW3. I mean in this situation, they might aswell put all their "smart ideas" aside and actually listen to what people complained about in vCoH\CoH2 so we have all chances to get decent game, because its not in their interests to fuck up CoH3 aswell.

Axis, OKW in particular should never complain about having vision problems or allies having vision OP units. Pathfinders maybe need a slight veterancy xp nerf, but other than that, they are completely normal and completely overshadowed by JLI

I'm not complaining about vision in particular. I'm personally complain about synergy and snowballing pathfinders create in teamgames, especially in 4v4.

Sure JLI in a vacum as a combat unit is for sure better, but I never said that paths are OP as a unit. Is the fact that, if you have teammate supporting you you can afford early forward reinforcement and have 0 CP unit which can fight almost like an elite unit in early game (against what enemy can throw at you) then lockdown the area, then snowball into scotts and have vision syneregy.

I mean, sure 4v4 is full of cheese and broken combinations, but Paths right now, imo, is the only cheese awaible from the start of the game and pretty much has no punishing mechanics if played right.

Simular to Pfuss G43 blobs, which are BS on its own right, but at least you have this small window of opportunity when you at least have a chance of beating them back before they start getting out G43 grades.

Against Pathfinders, unless you outplay USF to almost a GG state early, there is litteraly no way you can punish them in early game, since Ost nor OKW are capable of pushing Paths supported by another player. You can just try to outsit them and wait untill LVs, but USF player will just paradop AT gun so you dont even have window before AT gun reach the front line.

I myself played with randoms and premades in 3v3\4v4, against lvl 16-19 USF players using this strat, played myself as USF using this strat against lvl 15-18 Axis. Sure I'm not a super uber competitive pro gamer, but still this is very-very oppressive meta strategy and its very hard to deal with it if the USF player know what he is doing. More often then not, its either RNG\Teammate or USF player fuck up which allows you to fight it back.

My point is, Allies need some cheesy cheese in order to stay competitive in 3v3\4v4, but at least other cheese strategies arent awaible from the start and they dont cover you pretty much from start till late game.

Yeah and if you put 222 on a safe distance you can devide this additinal range by 2. To maximase 222 range with scopes and have simular results of any inf based recon units have you have to sit on the front line with it. Or micro it away from AT guns, while with PFs you either A move forward or put them in super camo and forget.

Thats why I was saying that comparison was wrong.

Sounds not bad. Good view when in cover.
That would nerf the earlygame little bit, tho in larger teamgames mid and lategame its like with commanders, everywhere yellow cover thx to arty hits

And at this time we have the scotts on the field. So this would not really change something. Beside we say pathfinder have to stay few sec before increase view starts.
That would mean if you play defensive on a vp you still have the same but if you attack you lose some power (aka you can't chase at guns so well, but still fight very well on fuel or vps points)

Well if the main objective is to make agressive scouting less powefull it also can be made so if they are in combat then then lose the increase vision aswell.

Since with vet3 you have super camo and you can just keep 1 squad on hold fire. Since, even if, lets say, you need to be static with them and there are already a buch of yellow cover from explosions, nothing really stops you from just pressing S during the fights and remaining in cover gaining additional sight.

Actually there are announcement dates on the roadmap, 20-21 of sep\nov\dec. So pretty much we either will get it in early Dec or in Jan\Feb 2022.