Profile of Australian Magic

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198105012992


Thread: [2vs2] RIP Axis4 Sep 2016, 08:06 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2016, 06:35 AMstrafniki pershing was labled as a heavy tank during ww2. this is a ww2 game. deal with it. Yea, labeled like "medium" was scratched and someone wrote over it "heavy". But that's not the point becasue we are not talkng about history but how unit performs and in game Pershing acts like a medium. Deal with it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF mortar still not fixed3 Sep 2016, 23:41 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2016, 23:31 PMFiresparks just because it was in the preview doesn't automatically mean that it's fine. No one caught the issue with t34-76 mg buff until it got into a larger testing base. and giving the usf a crappy mortar seems like it's doing it for its own sake. It feels like an obsession with providing them with a mortar without regarding for design or balance. I also say that even a crappy mortar will be too much for the early USF. It's giving them extra option and strength at the stage of the game where they already dominate. A crappy mortar doesn't help the USF with their weak late game while buffing their already powerful early game. If USF player goes for 2RF+1Mortar it means you can easily punish him for that becasue your field presence will be greater. USF needed mortar to be able to fight with HMG/buildings without mandatory nades - that was the point of mortar. USF were forced to go for nades always vs HMG/Buildings so putting mortat behind nades does not have any sense becasue it was to be able to skip nades. It's not good when a faction is forced to do something becasue there are no other tools. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF mortar still not fixed3 Sep 2016, 23:27 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2016, 23:25 PMFiresparks because it provide the USF with a reliable way to counter garrison, mg, and atg as well. a decent mortar is one of the most useful unit in the entire game. Giving one to the USF is a huge buff. Decent - that's the thing. USF mortar should be T0 and weakest. If it was weakest mortar which provides small damage and smoke we wouldn't hade this conversation. But it's best mortar so here we are. I say nerf it and we're done. Still wonder why in preview mortar was fine for everyone and the suddenly Relic turned it into best one In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF mortar still not fixed3 Sep 2016, 23:23 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2016, 23:22 PMFiresparks that's the point. I see no reason to slow down teching just to get mortar. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF mortar still not fixed3 Sep 2016, 23:21 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2016, 23:20 PMFiresparks putting it behind grenade means the USF can access it regardless of lt or captain. But it slows down teching while they already have to pay to racks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF mortar still not fixed3 Sep 2016, 23:19 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2016, 23:02 PMFiresparks Put the USF mortar behind the grenade upgrade. No mortar without teching. If you want to put mortat behind teching, put it in Ltn tier, or keep it on HQ and unlock once Lt/Cpt is ready. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [2vs2] RIP Axis3 Sep 2016, 22:55 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2016, 19:03 PMHighfiveeeee I know that the rant of some Axis fanboys here is way too much over the edge but I honestly think that you have to be a fool to say that Axis and Allies are on the absolute same level in terms of winning possibility right now. If you simply ignore all Katitof + Australian Magic posts, I think this board can develop some very interesting conversations. Sadly there are no many topics where they are not. Like you saying that Vickers is amazing at suppressing, almost as good as HMG42 so Mr. Smith had to wreck you so hard? If you look closely you will also notice that I'm playing rather equally with all factions (not favoring just one side like others... ) and recently almost only as axis, especially in 1v1. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [2vs2] RIP Axis3 Sep 2016, 12:49 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2016, 12:28 PMullumulu yeah..i have so much replays...unbelievable which noobs can win this game only with 2 units I went through your posts and since the first one you constatly whine how axis are up and how allies are OP. So I ask, why don't you play a game post a replay? Then we will see where the problem lies. In other words, stop trolling and start to be reliable. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [2vs2] RIP Axis3 Sep 2016, 12:20 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2016, 12:14 PMullumulu u face in 2v2 only alli blobbs. no skill if u take rifles. wtf relic? and the possiblity as okw is low to conter blobbs.. u need much skill, the right commander and a dump enemy how cant hear a stuka, artilierie or sturmtiger.... maybe than u can win....but if the alli blobbs...no sense to play If you have so big problems maybe you should post a replay of a game which caused you so much problems so people here can work on it and show you some misteakes? Instead of constant whines.. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [2vs2] RIP Axis3 Sep 2016, 12:01 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2016, 11:34 AMStug life hp is not all if so Churchill should be capped to 1 count the gun too So how do you define heavy tank in CoH2? IMO hp pool and slugish movement is everthing to define heavy tank in CoH2 but try prove me I'm wrong. KV1 is the only exception for slugish movements but it's problably the worst design tank in game with it's veterancy and has no defined role on battlefield. In: COH2 Balance