Profile of braciszek

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 2053

General Information
Steam: 76561198027972381


Thread: Patch notes for 23rd June17 Jun 2015, 21:12 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Jun 2015, 21:10 PMNapalm Are we super duper sure of this? Its not on the list unless its a typo from copy pasting from Alpha changes. In: Lobby
Thread: Do not be so disappointed!17 Jun 2015, 21:04 PM I cant play CoH2, not even upcoming patch. Alpha CoH2 was just too damn good in comparison... In: Lobby
Thread: Patch notes for 23rd June17 Jun 2015, 21:01 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Jun 2015, 20:54 PMbroodwarjc You obviously misread...the whole freaking patch notes. Tigers(ALL VARIANTS) limited to 1. AT Nades do crit engines on heavy and medium tanks at 75% HP and since they do more than 75% HP damage on contact to light vehicles they do engine crit them even at 1000% HP. (Probably typo) The list of heavy tanks that are limited does not include KT. Wasnt limited like the others to begin with, anyways... Callin heavies being the intention, minus KV-1 and KV-8. And full health light vehicles do not get engine critted, or at least my m20 didnt... :/ In: Lobby
Thread: Patch notes for 23rd June17 Jun 2015, 20:33 PM ... Sadface In: Lobby
Thread: Relic add accuracy to Jackson14 Jun 2015, 17:18 PM No? "Relic nurf Jackson, it pens too much (and HVAP still does 240 damage for reasons)" See the problem? Its fine. A Jackson missing is much less painful than a >NDA< missing... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Guard Motor Solution?14 Jun 2015, 17:16 PM "Mark vehicle" People still have problems with this?... In: Lobby
Thread: T-34 needs a buff11 Jun 2015, 16:22 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Jun 2015, 16:17 PMBlalord Thank you ! So you want a buffed T34 that he is already good because of timing of tech as you said ? I want a buffed T34 in response to what is to come. What is to come changes current T34's usefulness into redundancy. That is why even Alex offers something because he knows no one will ever glance at it again... Assuming what we were given would actually be released. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: T-34 needs a buff11 Jun 2015, 16:14 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Jun 2015, 15:32 PMBlalord This is why Luvnest as SU build a T34 each game ? He builds it as rushing for it creates a lot of shock value if the enemy has inadequate AT and no/inadequate armor, allowing him to rampage and cause chaos before the enemy can properly counter it. Not because it is good, but because of the timing of tech... Agh, NDA plans to change the meta and we'll definitely see other strats that are either as good or perhaps better (but against a different enemy strat). Point being building it with the intention of attacking an enemy that is properly prepared is a very bad decision... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: T-34 needs a buff11 Jun 2015, 14:36 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Jun 2015, 11:32 AMZyllen I still have not seen a single decent argument why the t-34 needs a buff. the best argument so far is that its not an 85 so it sucks. well i can say the p4 sucks just as much then. but the t-34 is fine save for its shitty vet 1 ability. In the land of NDA (unless Relic changes things without majority of recent alpha tester's knowledge), whatever advantages the T34 had over the enemy and within the current stock army become completely redundant/nonexistent, making it much rarer and very unfavorable. - Sorry NDA, but this thread needed a reason. T34/76 has to have something/at least what Alex said (slightly cheaper, a bit faster RoF) INB4 People already mentioned this pleasedontkillmemods In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer's Panzer IV vs Sherman/T34 Costs 10 Jun 2015, 17:44 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Jun 2015, 17:32 PMelchino7 This just further confirms that the tank is only good as a rush/shock unit rather than due to the performance on the unit itself. Exactly. Which means it will require something in order to be worth using... later. In: COH2 Balance