Profile of Unshavenbackman

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 680

General Information


Thread: Partisans reinforcement cost.4 Mar 2014, 13:58 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Mar 2014, 13:16 PMdasheepeh My main Issue is with the AT Partisans. I usually "one time use" my normal Partisans but im very afraid of suicide charging AT Partisans, because of the price of a full conscript squad and because of the, in my subjective opinion, very high chance to drop their AT equipment upon death. And nobody wants to gift the enemy a Shrek right? Im usually stuck with these Partisans then who cost a lot to reinforce, are squishy and hurt the MP income. Partisans should come with a cyanide-ability. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Penal Battalions THE THREAD!4 Mar 2014, 12:34 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Mar 2014, 09:13 AMJaigen just put reinforcement cost to 20. your supposed to merge scripts with penals but that's a tedious amount of management Sorry but I think this is a bad idea. Merging is a cool ability and skill (finding the time to merge) should always be rewarded. Its better to lower their initial cost and hold on to their reinforcement cost, othervise merging becomes obsolete. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 2vs2 epic battle3 Mar 2014, 20:37 PM Great game! In: Replays
Thread: Penal Battalion anyone?3 Mar 2014, 19:04 PM Is the flamerupgrade worth doing on these guys or its better not to? Or should you always upgrade them if you have the muni? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Re AT stats2 Mar 2014, 16:44 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Feb 2014, 17:34 PMAmiPolizeiFunk I'd say give it a while to sort itself out. Right now all 2v2 AT teams are starting from scratch and most of them still have "P" provisional ratings. See how it is in a week or two when most of those teams actually get ranked. Yeah, lets hope that it gets better. Just some patience i guess. If it does get better I think that the AT is a great thing. In: Lobby
Thread: Expansion Poll!2 Mar 2014, 16:26 PM I think it would be better to bring in just one new faction with the expansion. This would make it easier to balance against the old factions. And surely the next faction should be Finland/Soumi. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winter_War It seems that the finns had wery few tanks. But - "Finnish soldiers were skilled in cross-country skiing." In: Lobby
Thread: Goodbye1 Mar 2014, 18:59 PM If its the loosing that makes you loose interest you can always compstomp. Not sure if the comp goes p2w-commanders. In: Lobby
Thread: Re AT stats28 Feb 2014, 16:51 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Feb 2014, 16:15 PMLe Wish I don't agree. Player base to small to divide that way. Imo its better to the dishes while you wait for a decent game than being steamrolled every game. In: Lobby
Thread: Re AT stats28 Feb 2014, 15:02 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Feb 2014, 14:50 PMLe Wish I agree with you on the top 10 or even 100 rank ami. It shows what teams are great. In that perspective it's a really great feature. But for us guys down the ladder. I'm ranked around the 2000s. In 2v2s. Ladders isnt everything, but knowing im around there feels good. It's not an honest representation since I play with a lot of different ppl, I know that very well. But the amount of team combinations are staggering. I'm going to do a lame comparison here but bare with me. Any sports team are ranked by their team efforts not on the individual line-up. Either they win, or they don't, no matter who is on the field, they will move up or down the ladder as a team. What I'm trying to get across is the sheer number of positions occupied with the same player on the same ladder. Few if none players play on multiple teams in "real sports" the same season. That said, it's fun to see with who you get the best teamgames with, and that your overall rank doesn't shoot down the drain because you are training up a new guy. Don't get me wrong, I like this addition, I am simplytryong to point out stuff that I feel needs to be lifted in the discussion. I don't want to go back to the old system, more help with tuning in the new. +1 Then there seems to be a problem with AT against random teams. Everytime a top-player enters a new AT that dont have 10 matches he could face any skilllevel. This means noobs like me will be matched against toptierplayers again and again. I have a AT but when hes not around it was quite fun before to go 2v2 random. It isnt anymore. In: Lobby
Thread: PLEASE READ Ladders Post-Aftermath Update27 Feb 2014, 23:55 PM Playing 2v2 with a random-mate at the moment is broken. I dont know why, but it is. In: Lobby