Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Ostheer Feedback16 Apr 2021, 10:32 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Apr 2021, 10:27 AMVipper Point here is that both stug/SU-76 can zone enemy tanks up to a point, SU-76 can do it while being cheaper and with less pop. In sort it might not be as powerful as the more expensive Stug but it is a cost efficient TD with the added utility of barraging enemy units. Glad to see you finally agree that stug is more efficient and effective AT then SU-76. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Ostheer Feedback16 Apr 2021, 10:22 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Apr 2021, 10:18 AMVipper TTK is also a bad indicator on it own because it assumes that TD will kill the tank... By that logic, firs unit to pen won the engagement, because other unit will back out and there is no real way to tell what unit is efficient or effective, because engagements never conclude and by extension, all CQC units are always fine, because opponent will just retreat with no loses. TTK is, was and always will be a valid indicator. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Soviet Feedback16 Apr 2021, 09:26 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Apr 2021, 09:17 AMZeroZeroNi M8, look at my player card, it's wide open and tell me that again. Jump back to quoted post16 Apr 2021, 09:20 AMNaOCl 7-man conscript squad beats volks in equal cover, when both vetted. They are better than "not-good". Not every faction needs elite infantry as stock. Perhaps you should reread the discussion, because you clearly do not understood what was being talked about. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Suggest to remove pre-made commanders 16 Apr 2021, 09:25 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Apr 2021, 09:11 AMTiger Baron Well first off, most people here don't play competitive. Irrelevant, otherwise we wouldn't need balance patches and commander reworks. You'd be going exclusively against meta or using your own non meta, being clapped hard and spammed forums asking for balance and nerfs, leading to new meta and so on. Second, if indeed there are only a few meta combos then what's the difference going to be here exactly to the competitive scene? For one, due to how decks work in AoE3, only about 30% of cards are non meta. With how it works in CoH2, 95% of all abilities would become irrelevant and at this very moment, in case you have yet to notice, we're working towards making as many abilities viable and desirable as possible, which is not the case of custom builds stacked all with meta options exclusively. Right now there are a few meta combo commanders and that's about it, as you said if you go something else you lose. In case you've missed it, we're in the middle of the process of changing that. And even within the current meta commanders, not all 5 abilities are top of the line when it comes to potency, contrary to stacking custom one with best stuff only. So in my eyes it'd be a win-win situation, the competitive people still have their "award winning" strats to play with while more casual players, which are again more numerous, get to experiment, roleplay, have fun and so on and so forth with the rest of the customizable options. For you, sure, you're just a comp stomper, literally anything goes for you and you can't blame balance for losing to AI. However for people who do play pvp, facing the exact same thing all the damn time is the worst possible outcome ever, again, this is also we had balance patches for last 8 years. There is absolutely no reason why we couldn't have this system in play by now other than the time for it being way past at this point unfortunately. Sure, if you deliberately choose to ignore all the reasons against it, I guess there is no reason not. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Suggest to remove pre-made commanders 16 Apr 2021, 09:05 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Apr 2021, 08:58 AMTiger Baron Well how do other customizable games do it then? By having meta set in reinforced concrete. Just check AoE3 deck building. You'll go off meta(which is 2-3 decks based on access to water on the map and rarely on opposing civ) on competitive game and you'll be rofltomped. I remember a fair amount of games where you build vehicles or robots and so forth with parts that you buy or trade for or whatever and they somehow managed to balance it so why not here? Because these are single player games or stuff like mechwarrior, which isn't balanced nor competitive. There is so much effort being put into not making pre-set combinations dominate or be irrelevant, there is no way to achieve balance with full customization, unless you want to see untouchable meta of exact same combinations in every single game or all of the possibilities being made completely impotent for equal appeal. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Soviet Feedback16 Apr 2021, 08:56 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Apr 2021, 08:52 AMZeroZeroNi It's your l2p issue dude if you think sov infantry is crippled. You might have played against it for so long to the point you have forgotten that SVT is not stock upgrade. Pre upgrade cons are reliable, not good. They will reliably deal damage, but that's still pretty damn low damage. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Ostheer Feedback16 Apr 2021, 08:55 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Apr 2021, 08:52 AMKlement Pikhtura 75% less damage and slightly less do not sound like a big deal, except Stug-G has enough pen to deal with stock mediums and pen TDs, SU-76 is clearly lacks in this regard, especially vs OKW. Also Su-76 kills p4 with 5 penetrating shot, Stug needs only 4 to kill 640 HP tank. If you add armor values of P4j, then SU-76 needs to fire 7 to 8 shots to kill it. On top of it SU-76 dies with 3 AT shots, Stug with 4. Not sure if all that 10 range worth it. SU-76 can handle medium armor alright, except OKW P4 and vet2 onward ost P4. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The problem with ptrs16 Apr 2021, 08:47 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Apr 2021, 08:33 AMmrgame2 i agree the ptrs rof against lv is too fast. https://www.coh2.org/topic/108011/commander-update-beta-2021-soviet-feedback/post/861614 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Ostheer Feedback16 Apr 2021, 07:49 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Apr 2021, 07:22 AMZeroZeroNi The SU-76 is cheaper, has more range better fire rate and slightly less pen and about 75% damage. I'd say they are on par with each other. Its really not. Its fine for its costs, but range and cost is all it has, it doesn't have anywhere near the firepower of stug. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Soviet Feedback16 Apr 2021, 07:47 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Apr 2021, 04:30 AMZeroZeroNi And soo................, Para's also don't have t70 supporting them. They don't need to, because they don't have mainline infantry that's crippled until late game and can actually compete and win engagements from get go. And Stuart isn't bad either. Point is, paras have nowhere near the pressure on them as soviet doctrinal inf, because stock inf actually does the job. In: COH2 Balance