Well, that's your opinion.
It is, that's why I've presented it as opinion, not a fact.
It is simply impossible for you to avoid going personal eh?
Oh please, you don't even understand what that phrase means anymore, you're using it every single time anyone disagrees with you as a counter argument to everything.
The number of player bring up an issue is rather irrelevant. For instance I brought the balance problem with changes to the HMG-34 which was listed as "bug fix" and had to deal with heavy opposition
https://www.coh2.org/topic/65093/hmg-34-in-dpp
and not only they fixed the issue, they even further buff the hmg-34 with veterancy buff recently.
Sure, bugs are bugs and require fixing, regardless if they give advantage or disadvantage post fix.
If unit doesn't scale well, it gets buffed, that's the life story of conscripts up until now.
But what's the reasonable balance argument about changing HGB?
We've seen plenty of opinions, but nothing that would actually be supported by in-game situation or use.
Papercraft theoretical scenarios are not the same thing as what happens in real game.
You want to fix something that doesn't require fix and can't make any other argument then "I don't like it in its current form" based on theorycrafted scenario that never occurs.
1
Katitoff
jove
Katitoff
Cobra
Relic Entertainment
보드카 중대 
