Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Changes i feel grens need3 Jun 2020, 20:05 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Jun 2020, 18:25 PMT.R. Stormjäger It boggles my mind how people still suggest removing sandbags from mainlines, despite the balance team constantly telling people it's not happening at this stage in the game's life cycle. These exact same people keep asking for completely new units to be put into the game. They aren't the sharpest knives when it comes to talking things within the realm of possibilities, they aren't even aware of existence of this realm. If sandbags are globally agreed problem by more then Justice League of 4digitrank, then start from increasing build time for long range units that benefit most from them, so if you want to build them during cap, you'd have to linger there after you finish before you move on to next one. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-76 - A Slight Adjustment3 Jun 2020, 19:54 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Jun 2020, 17:35 PMachpawel If at gun didn't have the barrage people would pick su76 much more often. Or maybe su76 should get two more barrage shells and ZiS should lose two of them? But it does have barrage and its not going anywhere. Also, I'll blow your mind with this, but: Jump back to quoted post3 Jun 2020, 17:39 PMaaa If su76 arrive earlier Then no one would be building p2 flak etc. This unit is so bad for its place that its hardly possible to do anything usefull out of it with stats changes. So stats changes isnt enough You mean like no one builds 222/251 or luchs vs brits?(except everyone does and somehow AEC is not an issue) Strongest option would be to replace su76 with shocks. AT partisans are also not bad for that t3 spot. But thats weaker variant. Going for that #1 prize on "most stupid suggestion" I see. As of su76 itself. This unit needs tools to stop mediums from chasing it. Maybe some crit shot that destroy main gun. AEC crit shot , shot on tracks etc. HP buff and mobility. That's... somewhat reasonable, but it does NOT need any durability buffs, mobility would go a long way tho, actually letting it escape situations all other lights escape with ease due to smoke or much higher mobility or both. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sneaky PIAT commandos3 Jun 2020, 14:23 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Jun 2020, 13:04 PMachpawel The point of balance at this stage of the game development is to pinpoint such things And I am saying that you are not even on the same hemisphere as the place you can poinpoint balance issues from if you play like you post you do. Best example? You see massive balance problem in this thread, where there is no balance problem, just lack of awareness and lack of proper counter unit problem aka L2P problems. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-76 - A Slight Adjustment3 Jun 2020, 14:17 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Jun 2020, 14:07 PMaaa Better replace this unit with some new one. Suggested changes will do nothing Great idea! We're delegating you for a trip to Canada to relic studio, be sure to prepare a presentation on how they would need to create new assets and animations for a new unit for the game studio does not support for 4 years now. Everyone knows this is MUCH easier and requires much less effort then changes to 3-4 stats. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sneaky PIAT commandos3 Jun 2020, 12:55 PM I'm not derailing anything. You are trying to pinpoint your lack of awareness and improper unit composition on balance and refuse to admit to it. Gimmick based plays can work once per game, if it keeps working against you, you've failed to adapt and that has nothing to do with balance. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sneaky PIAT commandos3 Jun 2020, 12:42 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Jun 2020, 12:40 PMachpawel It was provided in op. I had quite a few games where falls were running like crazy across the whole map lategame using craters. This mechanics is just broken for powerful units. Ambushes should be real ambushes not full speed charges. And as explained in following posts, this and every other mechanic is "just broken" if you completely ignore opponent doing it and do not even attempt to counter it. Do you know how overpowered TDs are when all you build is vehicles? Do you know how overpowered HMG spam is if opponent only builds mainline inf? Do you know how overpowered mines are when you never sweep? Do you see how it all circles back to L2P problem? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sneaky PIAT commandos3 Jun 2020, 12:26 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Jun 2020, 12:16 PMachpawel snip Unless you want to present an actual replay or clip as evidence to back that laughable claim of yours, its just void theorycraft with no ground to stand on. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: UTT and the 2v2 meta - already stale?3 Jun 2020, 11:38 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Jun 2020, 11:21 AMCreativeName if you can name me one way to counter it that actually is viable pls pm me. Why the need to PM? Why aren't you aware of MHT? In: Lobby
Thread: NKVD retreat ability vs OKW Sturm officer3 Jun 2020, 11:17 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Jun 2020, 11:16 AMblvckdream You can't use the officer properly + equip your Füssiliers until late in the game. It doesn't have very good synergy because without the G43 upgrades Füssiliers are horrible. And you don't want to use more than 1-2 Volks either because Füssiliers are just better long term. I find that frustrating when using this doctrine tbh. Maybe in 1v1. 2v2 and up there is no muni issue. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Reworking 'Brace'3 Jun 2020, 10:36 AM Huh, that's interesting. In: COH2 Gameplay