Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: No compensation for deleting the Ost T4 cap buff?10 Aug 2020, 11:57 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Aug 2020, 11:42 AMullumulu i dont see a big issue to follow the brits upgrade logic: invest some ressources into global upgrades > get a better sqaud for the lategame. lets see: whould it be OP to get 5models grens when u invest 400mp and 50 fuel from t4? no it wouldnt. (logic from brits) And I don't see a big issue to follow the OKW heavy vehicle logic: invest resources into tech you wouldn't normally get and get a heavy tank possibility for it, lets give soviets stock IS-2. Would it be OP to get limited heavy tank as allied faction after investing in tech you normally wouldn't? No, it wouldn't. (logic from you) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The direction of balance. 8 Aug 2020, 21:51 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Aug 2020, 20:50 PMBrick Top The main consideration picking a commander should not be what you want to do, but rather what is your opponent doing. It ma No, if your stock army can't deal with whatever opponent is throwing at you, you have bad balance. This is how soviets played for 4 years. It was horrible, it forced you into tiny number of very specific doctrines regardless of what was meta(guards were completely mandatory pick for at least 3 years). Doctrines should supplement or enhance your playstyle, not be a reactive counter to what opponent does. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: State of OKW in the meta 8 Aug 2020, 16:47 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Aug 2020, 16:33 PMSgtJonson They still are very squishy. I think it does not need much effort to delete them from the field. Way too vulnerable for a unit that you need to cqc and repairs at the same time. When its employed as CQC and when it have most impact, there is nothing on field that would even remotely threaten it. In late game its usually busy repairing, planting mines or capping as its no longer needed on the front lines due to appearance of obers. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-85 and SU-768 Aug 2020, 16:45 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Aug 2020, 15:21 PMHannibal Last game is always saved as the temp file I'm so fed up of people repeating that, I'm going to lift next one who says it using just one, middle finger and guess where I'll stick it in to keep the individual stable while lifting? No, but seriously: Don't you think that citing a meta unit from at least 1-2 years ago (if not even more) might not work anymore today? Stats have not changed all that much for units in question. But its not the unit stats that made the combo fall out of use, it was binding the KV-1 to tier 4, which removed only reason to ever go for SU-76 over 85 if you are not being roflstomped to the point where you can't afford T4 before opponents meds roll out. Also to make this work you must already be winning the game, otherwise there's no way you have 50-80% more resources lying around than your opponent. That is not relevant, because as I've already said, that combination became completely invalid the moment KV-1 was bound to T4 with SU-85 completely overshadowing 76 as a viable pick. SU-76 is completely unneeded for its timing and is completely redundant where it could be useful. Again, unless its going to get complete rework, it will never be used again with call-ins gone. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-85 and SU-768 Aug 2020, 15:01 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Aug 2020, 13:11 PMHannibal Do you have a replay on that? Would love to see how you pull that of. Last time I've used it was still when KV-1 was call-in. As already aforementioned, it got replaced by SU-85, because there is no reason for 76 when you have 85 already unlocked. And yes, it did worked flawlessly when it made sense to do it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is the WC 51 overperforming ? 8 Aug 2020, 09:49 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Aug 2020, 01:43 AMachpawel And that is why they are so difficult to balance. The crew argument is absolutely valid. Except... they ARE balanced. Its not 2015 anymore, update your game. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-85 and SU-768 Aug 2020, 09:47 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Aug 2020, 08:07 AMVipper There was little reason to use the unit with KV-1. KV-1 is able to win vs a PzIV. You've heard of Panthers and Tigers? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: List of my Suggestions for Balance with reasoning8 Aug 2020, 09:47 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Aug 2020, 02:49 AMthomasagray Why not reduce it to 200 manpower, but only for 1v1 games. After all, the caches would only benefit you. Because for 1v1, when you usually get only 1 cache and even that occurrence is pretty rare the cost is not an issue. It targets 3v3 and 4v4 where you spam them on every space available to you. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is the WC 51 overperforming ? 7 Aug 2020, 21:30 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Aug 2020, 18:38 PMVipper The cost of the crew alone is something like 170 mp so direct comparison with light vehicles from other faction can be misleading. Using that as an argument is utter bullshit. You do not have shermans costing 600mp because they have crew. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Rifle grenade=dodge BUT allied grenade=MP bleed7 Aug 2020, 19:33 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Aug 2020, 14:39 PMachpawel None of this changes the general pattern. One situation with vet 3 above 80% health gren squad changes nothing tbh. Just an exception from the rule which does not change the rule. How mp per model is counted changes nothing in this discussion, either. Did you even accepted the rule? You know, the ACTUAL rule I have brought up? Or are you saying that in context of that bullshit you have regurgitated earlier about reinforcement costs? In: COH2 Balance