Not a fan of statistical arguments. Direct comparisons of unit stats are pointless because there are too many factors involved.
This is why I also consider replays more valid.
Replay where?
It's easier to just discuss the gameplay itself.
All game is balanced.
You can not change my mind.
You are completely wrong, always were, always will be, I am completely right, I do not need to say why, because I'm so right, it almost feels wrong.
I played this one game and it proven all what I'm saying correct.
No, you can not see the game. No, I will not describe what happened, all you need to know is it happened and I'm right.
But its right and I am right.
And its right that you are wrong.
(this is how discussing "gameplay itself" looks like with people who do not argument using stats or replays. This is how this very thread looks like.
Statistics only become relevant when talking about the exact implementation of changes.
If you are incapable of identifying and explaining a problem, you are incapable of fixing it and no amount of theorycraft will change that.
All my complaints are rooted in actual standard 1v1 gameplay. Every 1v1 player would at least understand where I'm coming from even if they disagree with the "OP" conclusion. You know it's absurd attacking me for my skill in this forum
Are they tho?
You are not providing arguments of your own and if you wanted to link all the previous threads in one place, you could've used links.
Also, players disagreed with you, you disregarded them and deflected ACTUAL ARGUMENTS.
This thread is pointless, because you're hopeless and there is nothing to discuss based on what you've written in the op.
Its a cry/rant thread, not balance one.
@Moderation
Whatever happened to that rule that prohibited having a threat in balance section if OP doesn't use evidence or stats?