Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Poor MG42 vs Rich MaxPin!14 May 2014, 13:59 PM Jump back to quoted post14 May 2014, 13:23 PMJaigen because of asymmetrical balance. The zis is more flexible because of barrage. but pak has superior AT power as compensation. Now we have a defensive mg42 and the offensive maxim. But the maxim surpasses the mg42 as a defensive tool as well. so right now we have the mg42 which requires massive amount of babysitting and is in general a liability and on the other side we have ultra flexible maxim that can even be spammed as a unit on some maps. This is an imbalance end of story. Ok, so lets sum up: If equal price unit of similar(not same) role is superior in some aspect for germans, its asymetrical balance. If equal price unit of similar role is superior in some aspect for soviets, its bad balance. Did I got you right? Because thats exactly what you have said. If you are loosing to Maxim spam, you're doing something terribly wrong, like refusing to use mortars or snipers. And don't give me crap about sov sniper, it doesn't exist in sov T2, if you refuse to use proper units to counter specific unit, its your fault, not games balance. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ISU-15214 May 2014, 13:07 PM Jump back to quoted post14 May 2014, 12:59 PMluvnest I don't mind the ISU 152 to be honest, but beeing able to one-shot squads aswell as two hit tanks from a distance is just stupid. It should be either/or. At least the Elephant excells in the anti tank role, but not at both. The funny thing is, no one ever asked about ISU AT buffs. People always wanted it to be more durable for the price and that was a rightful buff. ISU AT was just as uncalled for as StuG III AI. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What to do about the ISU 15214 May 2014, 13:04 PM Jump back to quoted post14 May 2014, 12:45 PMluvnest The Elephant is an dedicated Tankhunter, it does not have any AI capabilities. On the other hand, the ISU just RAPES everything. There shouldn't be any units in the game who excel at both AI and AT. That's just stupid and hurts the game a lot. I agree! Nerf tigers and brummbars! In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Poor MG42 vs Rich MaxPin!14 May 2014, 13:00 PM Jump back to quoted post14 May 2014, 12:54 PMJaigen Easy to say l2p without any arguments. the disparity between the use and worth of both mg's is rather colossal. if the maxim can simply ram itself into a mg42 and win you know you have a balance issue. It might be a complete newsflash for you, but HMGs are not supposed to fight each other equally, just like snipers are not supposed to fight each other equally, just like cons and grens are not supposed to fight each other equally(advantage shifts with distance and upgrades here), just like IS-2 and Tiger are not supposed to fight each other equally, just like mortars are not supposed to fight each other equally, just like AT guns are not supposed to fight each other equally ect ect. Do you start to see the pattern? Why do we not see a threads saying "ZiS-3 is OP and needs nurfnurfnurf because it beats PaK40 and even PaK43"? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Western Front - lack of info?14 May 2014, 12:36 PM Well, since they plan(or were planning) to get more people into the alpha in waves, eventually leaks will appear, which will again hype people up. I just hope that one year after release we won't go back to step one with balance with new armies. Relic being absolutely horrible at marketing is another story. In: Lobby
Thread: This patch killed Katyusha and Werfer14 May 2014, 12:04 PM Jump back to quoted post14 May 2014, 12:01 PMjackill2611 Also there is 25% more incoming accuracy on weapon teams since last patch (MGs, mortars, ZIS and PAKs), who knows does it affect katty?werfer barrages? Indirect weapons don't target entities, but ground, therefore no accuracy bonus other then the scatter on range one applies. If you want to be deadly and accurate with pwerfer and katy, drive them closer. At vet2 they are very much usable at max range. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Omega's Japanese Faction13 May 2014, 12:44 PM Jump back to quoted post13 May 2014, 12:40 PMdasheepeh So you want a faction that is all about gimmicks but not about actual solid power. If that is the case, why not play soviets? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Honest opinions about Balance - Soviet adv13 May 2014, 10:07 AM Jump back to quoted post13 May 2014, 09:54 AMVetLolcake Do me a favour and stop posting your pro soviet garbage in my thread. Post your own thread and do what you want. You talk crap and are here to offset all reasonable arguments that soviets are now imbalanced. In short: fuck off. Do the community of CoH2 a huge favor and eat your own advise mr hypocrite. You're so biased that you attack by default anything that do not include building a shrine for germany and worshiping it ever after. You and players like you are the rot of the community and exact reason why we don't have "how to beat X Y strat as Z" we've had back in CoH1 and have fucking fanbois like yourself lead their forum crusades and forum pvp because the likes of you can't play the game at all. @Chegwin Most know, but some like talking to a wall or test their patience reasoning with blind zealots who don't give a crap about balance. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Honest opinions about Balance - Soviet adv13 May 2014, 09:35 AM Jump back to quoted post13 May 2014, 09:25 AMKreatiir I believe you guys, I really do. But maybe I meant the relaod time or I dunno, it doesn't take 1 sec to fire off, reload and fire. I don't ask that, because that's way to fast. But it takes too long to fire 2 shots imo. Then that is a reload and it is perfectly fine, otherwise there would be absolutely no point for soviet lights to even be in T3 and T4. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pumas and Target Weak Point13 May 2014, 09:34 AM ^You never rolled tripple vet LMG osttruppen, am I right? I have uploaded a rep with that recently In: COH2 Balance