Profile of Katitof

Dont make me laugh. as usual you don't give good arguments to back up your opinions or once again you say l2p. not to mention the arguments you do give are false or are strawmen.

And we have a classic here.

You can't even reply to what I've written, mr. red shirt guy.

Show Spoiler

P4 scatter change was put in place because P4 obliterated infantry as well as tanks, there was absolutely no reason to get OStwind or StuG, now each have their own + and - and I see you have decided to completely ignore huge pintle MG buff, which makes it much better at AI.

About StuG, it got cost reduction and considerable buff against infantry. It still have better AT DPS then P4, and getting it together with P4 is a good idea. It costs 80 fuel, 5 more then T-70 and SU-76, don't expect it to be effective against heavy armor, because its clearly not what it is intended to do. Against med armor its only slightly less effective then it was.

Pgrens are not assault infantry, they are clearly not meant to be as PQ said.
Try using them as intended.

Panther deserves some fuel cost decrease, but thats it, its fine stat-wise now.

Nice game on the woods.

Unfortunately it devolved to ele vs isu.
Kudos for german team for doing crew shock+stuka dive combo.

Also, I've got a peculiar bug, when I loaded I could only rotate camera, holding control fixed it and eventually after some keyboard mashing it fixed itself.

Rank 73 sov vs rank 58 ger team.

Out of curiosity, I went and tested this, using S-Mines (40 damage) as a unit of measurement. 1 S-Mine took out half of the Osttruppen's health, which means they do indeed have 80. Same for the Grenadier and the Partisan.

It might just feels like they die faster because their rifles do 8 damage instead of 16, so when you get a hit it ticks off a very small part of their health bar, but when they hit you, it's a much larger chunk removed.

Well, mines aren't the best source to test this. You can hit just one model with them or you can hit 3 models, you can't reliably determine who got hit and who got not, cons for example will loose half hp of s-mine only if they are bunching up, usually it takes 3-4 of them to squad wipe, 2 are quite rare.

I've based my assumption on the portion of health they are getting lost after being hit by a con rifle and to me it seems like their health loss is more on the level of gren health bar loss, then actual con, which they are supposed to have same effective HP.

Regarding DPS, they are apparently supposed to have around 11 DPS as a squad, while cons have 17.
At long range they are supposed to have around 3.8 while cons around 4.5.

So while there is a difference, it just doesn't feel right.

So, stats say they have 80hp per entity, but to me they seem to have same effective health as gren squad.
Anyone else have this feel? Could a stat digger see and check that?

Comparing the DPS, cons should kill osttruppen about 50% faster then osttruppen kill cons, that also doesn't seem to be the case(using same cover) as cons seem to be doing over twice the DPS of osttruppen, unless they don't have 80 hp per entity as they should.

That would also explain their awful performance with the current cost as they were given "this patch" costs and weapon performance, but it seems like their survivability is exactly the same as when it was when they were still 120mp.

Yes, I remember that small arms got more lethal, but comparing their DPS alone against cons in same cover leaves the engagement with much bigger con advantage then the raw numbers tell, yes, I have repeated it quite a few times and the outcome was always the same.

It does feel like they still have 48hp per entity instead of supposed 80.

I wouldn't be surprised if I was right about this, considering partisans can have 160hp since march deployment as well.