I've used it in 2v2, in 1v1 it's nearly impossible
Was it at least equal 2v2?
People tend here to use as examples games where one player stomps the other and the game is decided long before the "issue" is present, but since its you I'm not making any assumptions before the answer. |
One question to those who are saying shermans and T34s were "superior": Let's say you are going to enter into a deadly tank battle 1v1 - one winner/one survivor type, but you have the liberty to chose between 2 tanks, the other one is for your opponent.
Var 1:
One Tiger - One T34.
Var 2:
One Panther - One sherman.
What would you chose? I'm sure it will be the T34 or the Shermann.... LOL.
And how many shermans or T34s were there for a single Tiger?
It doesn't matter if you have best tank in the world, when you have just a handful of them, while your opponents have tens of thousands of theirs.
And guess what?
WW2 tank battles were not about 1v1 duels. |
So these 20 sec freezes, which afterwards fast forwards everything that happened, are not my computers fault?
No, its an issue that appeared with WFA, I have reported that back in alpha, got sloppy response and then got ignored. |
|
This is the issue I don't mind being spammed all over the forums.
I also had my fair share of losses because of these freezes.
It doesn't drop me, but haveing no control over your army for 20 seconds can mean you will have no army when freeze ends, which happened on multiple occasions.
|
|
Because panzerfusiliers have less DPS at max range, can't spawn from buildings, can't sprint, are hare to all put in cover, all of them got G43 as opposed to 3 fusiliers and do not require 90 muni to get G43? |
Who's talking about going toe-to-toe with heavy tanks. I'm talking about cheap fast tanks costing 80-85 fuel that can be spammed to hell and back fighting beside a fearsome infantry force that can cripple and leave large tanks vulnerable to being swarmed or taken out with call-ins. Not to mention heavy emplacement positions and great ambush capabilities.
Oh, please, explain to me how well is that going for T-70 and Stuart, which are actually superior to that "medium tank" of japs.
Also, what fearsome infantry force? They didn't even had anything on pair with mauser or mosin nagat not to mention garand. They had their fanatism only. |
...with Relic's change of stance from DLC to 'we'll give it out for free.....eventually' I assume we'll have to wait several years to 'win' the new campaigns via war spoils.
Either that or they'll forget what they said and sell it anyway.
Toy can't "drop" ToWs, so what makes you believe it will be any different for that? |
|
If something was not deployed and haven't seen combat, it can't be in coh2.
Japanese also had a load of modern jet fighters in mountain factiries, yet we don't see them in any ww2 game or rts.
Its because prototypes, even mass produced ones are just prototypes if they have never seen actual combat.
And most of "on pair" jap armor was just prototypes. |
4v4 is a game mode as any.
Where is it written that 4v4 is meant to be unbalanced?
In the book of logic.
Resource inflation+much more doctrines+you can go AFK for 30 min, get back and still win+general lack of aggresiveness due to campy "meta" of 4v4. |
|
Cool.
Now show a top 50 1v1 or 2v2 game where this was used and actually won the game.
Can't?
Then the issue doesn't exist. And don't bring up 4v4, all kinds of shit go there and it will never be balanced, its hilariously amusing seeing all these 4v4 spammers complain about spam tactics in spam game mode. |
Relic Entertainment
