im surprised you didnt compare the pak43 to the 45mm AT gun. then you couldve made your point look so much stronger.
Do they have similar cost or arrive at similar time?
See, I like to compare units of similar tier/cost/performance, if you feel like reading hyperbole, please search for nearest Frikadelle or Vetlolcake.
but seriously, the pak has 10 more penetration than a zis. i dont need to explain the you that the zis excels in other areas.
And 50% better ROF. Sure, ZiS can barrage, but no one is going to barrage tanks, this is why its no competition in AT dps versus PaK.
as for the american AT gun, it has the best range and is able to spot for itself by using "take aim" after vet 1, it also get +50% penetration by using AP rounds. 210 pen with 70 range and extra sight.
I think you need to play americans a bit more if you think their AT gun can spot for itself, the ability increases range and nothing else, and again, you need to spend munis to get what other AT guns have by default in terms of penetration(why have the ability in the first place if the gun is completely ineffective without it?).
claiming the most common AT are bazookas/schrecks therefore axis armor is worth more is not fact
I've said AT guns in the first place, zookas/shrecks 2nd. Don't know how it is in your games, but I have yet to see a game without pshreck volks and captain/bazooka RETs aren't uncommon either.
And this goes for pretty much all AT, not just these two, tank guns, TDs are no exception.
But you know stats, I don't need to tell that you that axis in general got more penetration then allies counterparts(not everything got a counterpart thou, StuG III I'm looking at you).
Relic Entertainment
