Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Open Beta Changelog23 Oct 2014, 17:30 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Oct 2014, 17:25 PMNinjaWJ Does the Kubel size changes mean small arms will hit it more often too? Small arms never could miss it in the first place. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Forget the pershing, Jumbo 76 is where it's at23 Oct 2014, 17:21 PM I'd rather have Jumbo then pershing. 1) It makes sense because there was much more jumbos then pershings that actively participated in combat 2) We already had pershing 3) It makes sense, because there WAS jumbo in europe at the time where USF and OKW armies are based on and not a single pershing was on the continent. 4) It would introduce new armor dynamic, weak rear armor, potent front armor, still 640hp. Firepower, say as soviet sherman. Thou I'm not sure if it wouldn't overlap with E8. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Open Beta Changelog23 Oct 2014, 14:37 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Oct 2014, 14:16 PMMuad'Dib Could it be by mistake? Maybe they changed the unit value rather than the call-in value by accident. Relic? Mistake? Blasphemy! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Urban Assault Doctrine23 Oct 2014, 12:05 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Oct 2014, 08:08 AMPanzerErotica This commander seems to outshine urban defense on so many aspects. At least those pgrens won´t spawn from ambient buildings. Not sure if we need any more forward retreat points. Obviously duh. Its axis commander after all. And soviet equivalent we might get around the same time? No retreat no surrender commander that 100% focuses on loosing conscripts to MGs aka another gimmicky, useless shit. In: Lobby
Thread: Is Coh2 ready for E-Sports?Post-oktober Betapatch discussion23 Oct 2014, 05:15 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Oct 2014, 23:35 PMGiaA Infantry shouldn't get one shot killed no matter what ability or unit we are talking about. I have yet to face a player who effectively avoided demos which means that they are certainly going to squad wipe at some point in the game. A grenade is easy to dodge unlike demos. Not sure why you start with the whole fanboy accusation bs. Then you're up for a surprise playing, well, any RTS game in existence as in all RTS games there are abilities/weapons that will instantly melt infantry in the area. And since we're talking about ww2 soldiers, not T-1000 dress up battles, there is no logical reason why infantry should survive direct hit from huge, high explosives weapons. Or to give you a better picture: You seem to believe that infantry should always survive direct hit from B-4 or sturmtiger, railway arty or many, many other off maps and indirect fire weapons as well following your logic. Do you really see nothing wrong with it? And I didn't started it, I simply replied to troll starting it. In: Lobby
Thread: Is Coh2 ready for E-Sports?Post-oktober Betapatch discussion22 Oct 2014, 20:50 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Oct 2014, 20:01 PMGiaA Demos squad wipe for 90 muntions so yes they need a fix. Newsflash: Some abilities will wipe squads. Normal 30 muni nade can wipe squad, what makes you believe a charge expected to demolish a bridge or building wouldn't kill a squad of infantry that walks over it? I know there is these 'Ubermensch uber alles' trend within axis players, but you are taking it too far. Or let me illustrate how you sound here with an analogical example: Teller mines need a fix. They destroy scout cars, they shouldn't. See? This is exactly how you sound here. In: Lobby
Thread: Is Coh2 ready for E-Sports?Post-oktober Betapatch discussion22 Oct 2014, 19:55 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Oct 2014, 19:48 PMBasilone They need to be easily detected when placed in the open like the Commando demos in coh1. Sweepers don't have any problems detecting them. And not everything was so great in coh1. They are incredibly expensive manually detonated mines, there is nothing wrong with their performance. In: Lobby
Thread: Is Coh2 ready for E-Sports?Post-oktober Betapatch discussion22 Oct 2014, 19:30 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Oct 2014, 19:26 PMspajn Doesn't change the fact that you can and many times benefit on skipping all teching so you can pump out the more cost efficient callin units instead. Which again, will fix itself when you will make stock units appealing. Demo charges need fixing but everyone knows you are a soviet fanboy so i don't count on ever making you understand. Thats exactly what a fanboy would say "I don't need to explain, everyone knows and U R FANBOI!" Well, sorry to burst your bubble, but it doesn't work like that, if you believe there is a problem, you better explain it. Thou if you want to be a poo flinging monkey, your call. Intended use of demo charges is a big BOOM under anything that walks/drives over it on controlling players demand. It does exactly that, therefore nothing is wrong with the ability. In: Lobby
Thread: Open Beta first impressions22 Oct 2014, 19:13 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Oct 2014, 18:53 PMRomeo In general I think soviet forward HQ will be much more viable now but I have yet to test myself or see it in action. Given that buildings can be taken down by small arms as well? I'm not entirely convinced. Might help against stuka one shooting it thou. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is Coh2 ready for E-Sports?Post-oktober Betapatch discussion22 Oct 2014, 18:44 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Oct 2014, 18:27 PMspajn I think it's fine, just need a fix to callins so teching actually becomes valid and fix democharges. Demo charges do not need any fixes, because they are not broken in any way. If you want to fix call-in meta, make tier units appealing, this goes specifically for soviets as all other armies have reliable tier units, only soviets needs to rely on doctrines for armor and infantry. In: Lobby