Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Ostheer vs USF13 Nov 2014, 10:43 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Nov 2014, 08:56 AMGreenDevil lol, offering a doctrinal solution to a non-doctrinal inf blob. GTFO, Katitof, allied lover. Hey mr. butthurtdevil, ever played as soviets? The game is all about doctrinal counters for non doctrinal situations for allies, it doesn't matter what devs say on the matter, because its not even close to reality(meta), its not end of the world that there is one or two instances where axis need that too. So, GTFO GreenDevil, random idiot. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: The imbalance between Allied and Axis Infantry Anti-tank 12 Nov 2014, 19:43 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Nov 2014, 19:03 PM5trategos Then again, considering asymetric balance and all that, I don't think the handheld AT gap needs to change. Asymmetrical balance means different factions have different means to deal with opponents, not weaker. This argument of yours is extremely popular within axis player lobby as they are the ones ending up with superior equipment, which isn't really justified enough by cost or performance difference. Wehr shrecks cost 120mun, USF zookas too, its not asymmetrical balance, its bad balance. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The imbalance between Allied and Axis Infantry Anti-tank 12 Nov 2014, 18:21 PM Should have put there PTRS for hilarity(since relic believes PTRS is so important that 3 different units can have it-guards, conscripts and partisans). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: My wish for better infantry combat12 Nov 2014, 12:21 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Nov 2014, 20:22 PMJaigen l2p issue. especially since usf vet for tanks is awesome. Exhibit A: Veterancy 1 Unlocks radio net Veterancy 2 +20% Speed +20% rotation +30% accuracy +20% ac/de-celeration Veterancy 3 +35% horizontal turret speed -20% reload Exhibit B: Veterancy 1 Unlocks Combat blitz ability Veterancy 2 +60% turret rotation speed -25% scatter Veterancy 3 -30% reload +20% rotation speed +10% ac/de-celeration Veterancy 4 +5 range -25% scatter Veterancy 5 +53.85% accuracy +16 sight range Exhibit C: Veterancy 1 unlocks blitz Veterancy 2 +30% Armor +40% Turret Rotation Veterancy 3 -30% Reload +20% Rotation +10% Acceleration Which one look least appealing? Can you guess which one belongs to USF? You've been proven completely clueless once again. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: About the B-412 Nov 2014, 12:12 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Nov 2014, 09:14 AMatouba Forget to say, I'm talking about 4V4 game. You always seem biased. Sorry, my mistake, I thought we are talking game modes where balance matters. Jump back to quoted post12 Nov 2014, 11:47 AMbämbabäm To the people saying to use doctrinal stuff: the need to equip one specific commander JUST IN CASE the enemy has another specific commander in his loadout is simply bad design. Players should not be forced into specific loadouts, as this reduces the variety of commanders actually used. There should be no unit and/or ability, doctrinal or not, that can only really be countered by doctrinal units and/or abilities. Umm, soviets are forced to it in all game modes since day 1. Good or bad design, it doesn't matter, its clearly intended design despite relic saying you shouldn't need doctrine to counter doctrinal stuff and yet units like JT can't be countered otherwise. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: About the B-412 Nov 2014, 06:57 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Nov 2014, 05:51 AMatouba If OKW players don't have an artillery flare commander, and the allies have enough AA units, then Axis GG, even the Ost players have 50KG stuka bombing run abilities. That M15 + M5 quad meta. Can you provide a single 2v2 or 1v1 game where soviets have more then 1 AA unit? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Call in units that desperately need buffing to be relevant11 Nov 2014, 22:30 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Nov 2014, 22:03 PMWingZero The Tiger tank needs to be buffed up a little bit. I feel like it lost its persona as a "Tiger Tank", now is just target practice for my Jacksons. Tiger WAS target practice for jacksons. Jackson was specifically made to destroy easily panthers and tigers. Many people greatly over estimate tigers performance and armor, it wasn't as awesome as holywood movies make it seem. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why is there no hold ground button in this game?11 Nov 2014, 22:28 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Nov 2014, 21:23 PMDiogenes5 Because it would HOLD GROUND. Is English not your first language? Units chase other units and run out of cover all the time for no reason at all when you leave them alone. It's beyond retarded. What if I told you that it already got that function? It would be just renamed stop button. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: JU-87 Strafe shredding tanks.11 Nov 2014, 20:41 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Nov 2014, 20:14 PMSierra How about no? It still arrives 3x slower than P-47's or IL-2's. It's fine as it is considering it can only kill Allied medium tanks that are neglected or ignored in placement. If by "arrives 3x slower" you meant "exactly at the same time" then you are right. Also, IL-2 doesn't wipe any infantry anymore unless its low on hp and it does nothing to vehicles. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Just bring us old Stug III! 11 Nov 2014, 20:39 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Nov 2014, 20:25 PMTNrg Yeah I don't understand why it got it's health reduced. There are only two weapons that make any difference in shots required to kill it. Or it was reduced before WFA? Can't really remember, anyway the only weapons it makes any difference against is PTRS and bazooka. For every single other-its still 3 except ISU and KV-2. @Mr. Someguy There is also armor that adds to survivability you know, allied AT weapons doesn't all have 100% chance to penetrate it unlike axis AT against allied armor and as a cherry on top, it got most firepower out of all vehicles around its price. In: COH2 Balance