Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Ostheer: What is to be done?28 Feb 2015, 13:55 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Feb 2015, 11:08 AMAustralian Magic I think he has in mind faster rate of fire, not speed Yea, after reading it again I suppose you might be right thats still meaningful difference thou. And I was so proud of that post In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Ostheer: What is to be done?28 Feb 2015, 10:46 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Feb 2015, 00:39 AMAlexzandvar It's 1.0 faster, that's it. And the accuracy stats are literally the same. Since stupid and you seem to be very close friends: Let me do advanced, university level math for you, because you might overheat in the process: 6.5-6.3=0.2 0.2=/=1 Reading stats, not for everyone, don't try this at home without parents over-watching you kids! Oh, and accuracy is always the same, its the scatter, rate of fire and AoE profile that matters against infantry and P4 have that superior. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Grens...28 Feb 2015, 10:36 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Feb 2015, 00:42 AMAlexzandvar All Ostheer infantry needs a 5th man, they can keep the same DPS. Then they all would need a price increase if you can't see the imbalance yourself yet(and I know you can't). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer: What is to be done?28 Feb 2015, 00:18 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2015, 23:57 PMAlexzandvar The 76 has a worse ROF, but as far as killing infantry goes both guns are the same. I didn't take into account the hull MG's because getting them to hit what you want to accurately is a pain in the dick. No, they are not, P4s gun is much more accurate and faster, you have that in the stats and you still try to argue it, hilarious. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Damn this balance28 Feb 2015, 00:15 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2015, 23:44 PMJaigen Yeah lets ignore the fact that these units cost more. But the ost and su tier 3 share the same problem : No AT and callins are flat out better. Lets also ignore the fact that unless you want to spam more then 4-5 of them the cost difference means only 30-50 second difference on hitting the field and nothing more. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer: What is to be done?27 Feb 2015, 22:00 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2015, 21:49 PM__deleted__ Eh, dude. Lets keep it at least a tad serious. If you lose an IS-2 to PIVs, (or a Tiger to 34/76s) you are doing something excessively wrong/mismicroed etc.. Just because every once in a blue moon with the help of a mine and the RNG gods you might actually kill a heavy with the vanilla mediums does not mean they represent a sound teching choice in either scenario. PIV with the assorted tech costs is a lousy choice against any Soviet call-in play, full stop. Other way around (meaning T34/76 vs Tiger), just the same. That is because heavies doesn't really have any disadvantage. They are plain upgrade over mediums, completely invalidating them the moment they show up. Bigger cost, lower speed and turret traverse, increased CP cost allowing stock mediums bigger opportunity window and possibility to get some stars and punish stalling for heavy, exploitable vulnerability to something that isn't 70 range dedicated TD- heavies need at least one of these to have actual negative result on the calling player instead of spraying him with benefits. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Ostheer: What is to be done?27 Feb 2015, 21:43 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2015, 21:23 PMNeo Rank 3000 in 4v4 just gave you some advice, Katitof. That's what they called pwned Yea, thats pretty normal here. Remember Jaigen lecturing Cruzz on balance(and that wasn't a single incident)? Or Joe Dove arguing L2P issues against Luvnest? Its just another one to throw in the bucket. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Damn this balance27 Feb 2015, 20:00 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2015, 19:53 PMJaigen In what way? Oh, you know, common sense and general performance way. T34 is worse against armor and infantry then P4. T70 is worse against infantry then Ostwind. M5 is worse against planes and infantry then ostwind. StuG is rather unique, but soviets would kill for something that can stun vehicles and penetrate them better then T34 while having superior range to other T3 armor in T3. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer: What is to be done?27 Feb 2015, 19:55 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2015, 19:37 PMAlexzandvar It's a better crusher than the PIV because it has higher speed, acceleration and basic turn speed. Because 0.2 speed and acceleration makes a huge difference(hint: it doesn't). And turn speed is exactly the same for both. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Can we "buff" the Ambulance Engine already?27 Feb 2015, 15:42 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2015, 15:37 PMAlexzandvar The reason the SWS has more speed and armor is because it's the most important OKW unit in the game hth. And? Does it need high speeds to set up on base sector? Thats not really an argument at all. If Ambulance can get to the point of Major deployment without any problems, why sws truck should be any different here? Unless you don't use it as a means to expand your base, but a combat unit for pushing infantry out of cover for free wins in early engagements, which it was not designed to do. You can also slow it down to ambulance speed and acceleration(which again, certain people believe to be fine for some reason) and put the upgrade for speed like brits had. Or you can admit its not fine and actually support an underperforming unit, which at the moment is nothing more then slugging med bunker. In: COH2 Balance