Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: New faction British??30 Mar 2015, 14:18 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Mar 2015, 14:14 PMAlexzandvar Except AA was only about 5-6 hours long, which can normally only be achieved through speed runs for HotS and WoL. Not to mention the fact that the expansions added new units for all the armies. USF + OKW + AA is the price of 2 Starcraft Expansions, while only getting you nominally more units and a single player campaign that was extremely poor for it's cost. Umm, replayability value for AA is incomparably greater then for any SC2 campaign. And are you REALLY arguing that adding 6 units is better then TWO WHOLE ARMIES? At this point I wonder if I talk to a frog who learned to type english. The fact that Relic literally did not make a single new unit for the AA campaign is rather telling. USF mortar? Rangers? Cavalry rifleman? Repair halftruck? Various new off-maps? The sherman from the last mission? Why are you talking about parts of the game you obviously NEVER played yourself and instead spit usual, inaccurate bullshit? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: USF wishes for patch30 Mar 2015, 14:14 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Mar 2015, 14:11 PMImagelessbean I gotta say this is completely silly, even by fanboy standards. One medium tank means bunk because the fuel cost will not prevent USF from fielding it. In a 20 minute game USF will be bleeding MP so fast to stay on the field with vet 5 units that no amount of fuel is going to help you there. True that. As USF you always have abundance of fuel and no menpower to use that fuel. In: Lobby
Thread: New faction British??30 Mar 2015, 14:09 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Mar 2015, 13:49 PMAlexzandvar Except the Starcraft Expansions added new stuff as well as a full campaign, which we didn't get with AA. So we didn't get USF AA campaign as well as 2 new ARMIES for price of full game with WFA+AA. Meanwhile, SC2 offered couple of new units and campaign for price of full game. I really wonder which deal sounds better. Next time before hitting that reply button reread the post couple more times until you understand it. Some people are slower then others, its normal, take your time and make sure you are replying for the whole post instead of just the part you've managed to process. Unless you have worst case of selective reading ever known to a man that is. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Possible leak on March 31st patch notes30 Mar 2015, 12:41 PM Here is one as well: In: Lobby
Thread: USF wishes for patch30 Mar 2015, 12:38 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Mar 2015, 12:27 PMJohnnyB Great, so, in fact, the game is balanced and OKW is not OP. "coal is black, therefore water is cold" Gotta love one army fanboys way of thinking, the correlations they come up with, simply hilarious. In: Lobby
Thread: Make or Break30 Mar 2015, 12:35 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Mar 2015, 12:17 PMnigo this is a leak or what? I'd call that brainfart if anything. Doesn't take a genius to know he made it up. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: New faction British??30 Mar 2015, 12:10 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Mar 2015, 23:27 PMThoseDeafMutes Doesn't have to be free, but the pricing model for WFA+AA wound up giving us one expansion pack's worth of content for the price of the full retail game originally (or more, depending on what region you were in). AA being 40 eur was in particular a slap in the face for people there. Which really isn't any different to anything other companies do. Look at blizzard and D3/SC2 expansion model. You get new content, pay like for full game and have millions of people jerking off how awesome and generous Blizzard is. Or how many Terraria reskins have you seen, next being more expensive then previous. Other studio does the same and the hurt of butts will be felt 3 generations into the future. Players double standards are simply stunning at times. Especially since you can make completely separate, full game out of WFA+AA. I'm not being for or against that model here, I'm simply saying that everyone does that and I see no reason to bash only a single game for it since whole gaming market does it and since players are buying it instead of sharpening pitchforks, lighting torches and marching against evil gaming companies, I see no reason to get worked up against it. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: USF wishes for patch30 Mar 2015, 12:06 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Mar 2015, 11:52 AMJohnnyB ...which, of course, in 1v1 means nothing. Nothing at all. It actually doesn't because of abundance of AT OKW gets. Unless you are rammed with something like KV-8 while you have nothing, OKW is more then capable to dispose of outnumbering armor, especially if its fragile USF armor. In: Lobby
Thread: Make or Break30 Mar 2015, 11:00 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Mar 2015, 10:57 AMHighfiveeeee Sources? wouldn't that be NDA breach? derp. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Zis Guns and Pak 40s30 Mar 2015, 07:49 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Mar 2015, 07:38 AMBurts Comparing zis-3 and pak-40 in terms of penetration is futile because the ZIS-3 WAS NEVER AN ANTI TANK PIECE IN THE FIRST PLACE. It was an artillery piece, like the pak howitzer or LEIG. Except that it was superior to both of these designs, because it could also double as a decent anti tank gun. Actually, that is up for a debate and not really definitively settled up until this day ZiS-3 field gun was used as AT gun just as much as it was used as artillery support. Soviets did have a real AT gun. It was called the zis-2 57mm. That gun was just as good, if not better, than the pak 40. And M-42. The most popular AT gun on soviet front, good, old M-42(inb4 "but it couldn't penetrate anything", go read up about gun pockets and soviet AT tactics). @AssaultPlazma Please tell me you didn't just compared IS-2 to sherman. In: Lobby