Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Which Faction Is OP At Present & Why ?13 Apr 2015, 10:48 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Apr 2015, 09:45 AMStrummingbird You know it's too late to fix your reputation when people don't take anything you say seriously When played to the maximum potential (best players, optimum vetoes, continual picking of most powerful strategies and commanders in every situation, every dirty trick used and abused (ghost wiring and sandbagging, truckpushing, etc), I'd guess Soviets for 1s and 2s. You could quite feasibly always go guard motor every single game OR shock rifle every game and reach top 20, and if you actually picked shock rifle or guard motor depending on the situation, go all the way to the #1 position, I think. I'm not saying soviets aren't strong, but op asks for overpowered faction, which currently none really is. There is no a single IWIN strat, there is no a single IWIN unit, OKW struggles first minutes against M3s, but thats pretty much it in the early game. Even USF isn't OP against Ost like they were last patch and soviets aren't stomped into a wet pulp by OKW bulletproof infantry, so yea, not really anything particularly OP this patch for the moment. There are some whines here and there, but 3v3 and 4v4 heroes with rank position looking like a phone number who rise these whines aren't exactly the most creditable sources to determine what is OP and what is not. In: Lobby
Thread: Which Faction Is OP At Present & Why ?13 Apr 2015, 08:16 AM I'm looking and looking and can't seem to find "they all seem pretty balanced" option. @Lenny12346 You didn't had to wait long In: Lobby
Thread: Ostheer, the never ending struggle13 Apr 2015, 07:15 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2015, 23:47 PMZyllen Actually you benefit far more from spamming grens then an easily countered mg. the difference between burst vs sustained damage applies here . on a 1vs1 basis the rifleman wins. but the larger the matchup becomes the more it shifts in favour for the grens. several grens firing on a riflesquad will completely wreck it within seconds. especially since rifles for the most part need to get into midrange to utilise their rahter short range weapon upgrades and thus more out of cover. hmg's are death weight against the rifles. Update the game already. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: WHAT ABOUT SU85 ??13 Apr 2015, 07:10 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Apr 2015, 05:13 AMAlexzandvar What is supporting your Jadgtiger? An allied player without armor support is a allied player who will lose a game. CaptainSprice begs to differ and he is hardly a scrub. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer, the never ending struggle12 Apr 2015, 22:44 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2015, 22:26 PMiceman I've switched over to Soviets from playing Ostheer.I totally agree with "SOVIET is easy". Cool story bro, tell us when you leave placement games. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Ostheer, the never ending struggle12 Apr 2015, 21:05 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2015, 20:42 PMS0_L337_1T_HURTS Your reasoning is so flawed I don't feel I need to directly address or bother trying to convince you. Fact is AXIS struggle from start to finish, and actually OKW have a much harder time now than OST. SOVIET is easy, stress free play. Dude... you have no slightest clue. His playercard shows us that your fact is pure bullshit and he does know what he speaks about in this particular case. Somehow he doesn't seem to struggle, neither do I when playing ost. Must be because WE DO NOT GREN SPAM LIKE MORONS. How about you take an advise for player who is clearly better then you(Lemon in this case) and learn to play? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: British Faction, what do you want to see?12 Apr 2015, 18:18 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2015, 18:15 PMAlexzandvar The .50 cal isn't shit by any margin (quick pack up and set up time combined with a fuckload of quick suppression). But all those 4 men squads suffer because of lack of offensive fire power, not because they die to easily. (All AT guns die to easy but that's a story for another day~). Must be why USF players use their HMG every game since it have decent firepower and the issue is definitely not dying instantly to LMGs and nades In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: New addition: will it be the Soviets campaign of 1944?12 Apr 2015, 18:14 PM He probably talks about ToW. In: Lobby
Thread: British Faction, what do you want to see?12 Apr 2015, 18:08 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2015, 18:03 PMAlexzandvar That's why they should have lots of support weapons in order to make up for the lower infantry capacity. Not to mention it's not like Allies don't have 4 man squads and Axis doesn't have all 4 men squads. Poor Soviets, made utterly irrelevant as they were meant to fight 4 man squads but are fighting 5 men Volks Remind me again how well that allied 4 men squads perform please? Partisans die to a sniff breeze. Irregulars are having heart attacks the moment they see opponent. USF HMG cries while praying to escape with last man on sliver of health. Both pathfinders are happy when they are in the bushes, outside of firing range. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: is2 and tiger ace12 Apr 2015, 18:03 PM You don't even have the slightest idea on how that "slightly" more scatter value transfers on the units performance, why are you even trying to respond in this thread? Larger AoE means shit if unit can't hit anything. Not to mention you went full retard and used the argument that already was explained 10 times why it is bad and can't be used. In: COH2 Balance