Profile of sultan36z

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 45

General Information


Thread: T-34-85 is underperforming23 Oct 2015, 16:37 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Oct 2015, 16:26 PMdaspoulos For only 5 fuel more than a p4 I think its just fine. t34/85 its doctrinal, p4 not :/ In: COH2 Balance
Thread: T-34/76 - just little fix22 Oct 2015, 14:55 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Oct 2015, 22:19 PMhannibalbarcajr Something needs to be done. Maybe just swap it out for the 34/85 since according to Soviet records, they built thousands more of the 34/85 than they did 34/76. Then you can go to the 2 34/85 commanders and change the 34/85 unlock into a 6 or 7 CP T34/76. This way SU gets a stock main line battle tank and can have the option of getting an early 34/76 but only doctrinally. You would have to tweak the cost a little bit since it would come so early but it is so underwhelming in it's current state that it might be fine as is. It needs to have a period of time to get vetted up anyway before the rest of the big boys come in or it will be even more hopeless. very good idea sir! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Does the T-34/76 need love?16 Oct 2015, 21:12 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Oct 2015, 19:17 PMAngryKitten465 It is fine in my eyes, I use them quite often when I play Soviets. Usually get two or three of them. Works well in combination with double zis gun and a conscript spam. Replay please? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Does the T-34/76 need love?15 Oct 2015, 16:02 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Oct 2015, 15:48 PMdaspoulos Its because soviets and ostheer have next to no incentive for going tier 4. T4 for these factions need to have like an upgrade for grens and conscripts because soviets and ostheer have to put in the most work to get to these tiers and don't get shit out of them. 5 man sidegrade for ostheer, coh1 bar riflemen upgrade for soviets that gives all conscripts dp28s for free. Thats my idea. More people who be compelled to go t4 and build whats in it. good idea, but t34/76 belongs on t3 in my opinion In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Homogenization14 Oct 2015, 14:35 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Oct 2015, 13:56 PMNabarxos whats the point of having 4 t34-76s if you cant fight infantry or tanks?? i used the unit alot even before the tech changes and i believe that the current t34-76 is just a kamikaze stun tank and nothing more,it doesnt fight infantry well and cant handle tanks. why should i spent 300mp and 80 fuel on a unit that will stun itself and damage its gun in order to stun for a little bit the enemy tank? mines and guards do it better and more reliably and cheaper so again its only use is to fight what eever it faces which in turn sucks at doing so(unlike the sherman) and here is GOOD asymmetrical balance USF Paratroopers vs UKF commandos vs OKW fallschirmjager these units are a good example of asymmetrical balance but the Panzer 4 vs Sherman vs T34-76 vs Cromwell the only unit here that doesnt have a unique aspect in the above example is the t34-76,and if you tell me"spamming it" is its unique aspect then i must guide you to the conscript example conscripts unlike t34-76s come early,this is the only difference between those 2 units I suggest get back t34/76 to t3 and make it more reliable AI unit and please give us KV1 on t4 as none doctrinal unit In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M5 Quadrush24 Jul 2015, 14:50 PM when the axis have to face something difficult in months... mourn # Adapt In: COH2 Balance
Thread: WHAT ABOUT SU85 ??10 Apr 2015, 15:34 PM An incentive is needed to continue being used as TD, everyone just wait till heavys. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: okw munis cost10 Apr 2015, 15:30 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Apr 2015, 14:55 PMKatitof Hey, he wants axis version of SU-76 at the cost of shreck I say we give it to him. After all Su-76 is ZiS-3 on wheels, not really any reason why axis version would perform any better lol that´s right In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: okw munis cost10 Apr 2015, 14:45 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Apr 2015, 14:29 PMTea Maker Machine With that. Pak 40 on wheels. i agreed but with the same armor as SU76 In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: WHAT ABOUT SU85 ??6 Apr 2015, 21:09 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Apr 2015, 20:59 PMBlackKorp lol? this unit is just fine Its not used very often and I think that is due to a problem with the unit itself . If it had a more solid role as a tank destroyer like jackson or m10 could be considered by more players, i think In: COH2 Balance