Profile of RMMLz

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1

General Information
Register Time: 27 Dec 2013, 16:54 PM
Last Visit Time: 28 Mar 2024, 23:06 PM
Website: https://shaderweb.com/en
Residence:

Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Nationality:

Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Timezone: Asia/Tehran
Game Name: <HOJAT>RMMLz

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Buff Ostwind10 Nov 2018, 11:58 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Nov 2018, 20:02 PMthedarkarmadillo While cool, something like that is more work and harder to balance I agree, but I was just saying that adding minor utility to units make them more "appealing" to use. That's the problem I see in many balance threads. People want to "see" a unit more and have fun with it, so they ask for buffs. If you greatly buff Ostwind, Ostwind rush will be the new meta and people will demand a buff for PZIV and so on. But by giving units some niche abilities without directly buffing them, almost everyone will be happy. I'd stay say that for Ostwind, a Lockdown ability which gives it a suppression arc (not 360) with "reduced" range would be a good idea. Kind of like an HMG42 with reduced range. But still, just an idea which won't happen. My point is to buff them by giving them abilities. For example, after years of release PzGrens are getting a buff which improves them while they operate near a vehicle. That's a great idea and encourage combined arms. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Grenadiers + HMG42s vs USF7 Nov 2018, 08:47 AM Hmmm... let me think. I wish there was a place in which you could upload your Replay and ask people and pro players to comment on your Strategy... oh wait a second... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Buff Ostwind7 Nov 2018, 08:42 AM Simply lowering the cost or increasing Damage/Accuracy/RoF is a bit boring tho. When it comes to making a unit more appealing I'd want to see more utility, rather than a simple buff to stats. Maybe a Hull down ability to increase AA and add suppression? Or a focus fire ability to instantly pin down a selected squad for 30 munition. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Buff Ostwind31 Oct 2018, 12:09 PM Jump back to quoted post31 Oct 2018, 11:59 AMKatitof Centaur was hit with pretty heavy nerfs. There is a reason why its no longer used. Its vet1 burst was also massively nerfed. It still does damage and probably still is better then cromwell, but its not as good as you think it is. I was just comparing it to Ostwind. I do remember how it was when the Brits were released. But compared to Ostwind its better, but I'm not saying its op or anything, it's Ok as it is. I was just pointing out that it counters infantry better than Ostwind. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Buff Ostwind31 Oct 2018, 11:28 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Oct 2018, 18:46 PMSuperHansFan it provides basically the same AI ability as centaur You can't be serious. Centaur has massive burst damage and wipes units much better than Ostwind My opinion: AA is fine since axis already have MGs. I'd say increase far accuracy and reduce damage AoE a bit. Also could use a bit of fuel reduction. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Updates on Relic leadership and communications25 Oct 2018, 19:39 PM Nigo strikes again! Thanks buddy In: Lobby
Thread: OKW needs some nerfs don’t you think?24 Oct 2018, 05:46 AM S-mines are fine and easy to counter. I'd say the received accuracy bonus is a tad too much on volks. Regarding RW, since light vehicle rush is so powerful (AAHT and T70 are so powerful, I would not say OP but very powerful) I don't believe nerfing it would be wise. Your argument sounds a bit biased tho. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M5 quad underwhelming23 Oct 2018, 14:26 PM I think the reason people won't get M5 is not the unit itself, but the extremely good performance of T70. Even with your suggestions, I don't think anyone would go for an M5 as long as you can get a T70. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How to counter heavy OKW blobs (or blobs in general)13 Oct 2018, 08:13 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Oct 2018, 22:07 PMGrim Now I admit to being a 3v3/4v4 scrub. I love the big team games modes so my experiences differ from 1v1 and to a lesser extent 2v2. In one of my more recent games, I was in a 4v4 as USF with 3 UKF teammates vs 4 Ost players. We literally got blobbed to death my panzergrenadiers....it was bizarre. We were winning for a good portion of the game when I think the enemy realised we struggled agianst massed infantry. Our hmgs were always focused by werfers then a blob of Pzgrens backed by brumbars moved in. If we'd had one USSR teammate it would have been a different game with one or two katyusha. It just felt really bizarre to hit a brick wall against such a simple tactic. Any armour was deleted in the first volley by the PzGrens and any attempts to counter with infantry were met with brumbars with werfer fire if we started to deal too much damage. Anyway, I know you were talking about 2v2 and OKW originally so I'll stop now before everyone thinks I'm TOTALLY incompetent. #notsalty Well, I'd say your opponent used combined arms, which is micro intensive. But seems like you got outplayed. You can always argue about balance, true, but it's not like they won only by massing infantry. I'd have to still watch the replay but theoretically, you could have used a commander with good cc. In larger maps you can also send an expendable unit (Like an AEC or t70) to hunt down PzWerfer. But I think you got outplayed. Still, you need a veteran player to watch and comment on your replay Remember vet 5 Schreck Volks with laser guided javelines?? Those were the days In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: the state of panzer427 Apr 2018, 09:57 AM OT: When I see "But in real life it was..." in a balance thread I stop reading. In: COH2 Balance